Showing 15 of 15 total issues
Function ST__CREATE_CONTEXT_P
has a Cognitive Complexity of 50 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
module.exports = function ST__CREATE_CONTEXT_P(context, type) {
if (type === ST_NONE) return context;
switch(type) {
case ST_RESTRICTED:
// Allow stream module
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function 'ST__CREATE_CONTEXT_P' has a complexity of 29. Open
module.exports = function ST__CREATE_CONTEXT_P(context, type) {
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Limit Cyclomatic Complexity (complexity)
Cyclomatic complexity measures the number of linearly independent paths through a program's source code. This rule allows setting a cyclomatic complexity threshold.
function a(x) {
if (true) {
return x; // 1st path
} else if (false) {
return x+1; // 2nd path
} else {
return 4; // 3rd path
}
}
Rule Details
This rule is aimed at reducing code complexity by capping the amount of cyclomatic complexity allowed in a program. As such, it will warn when the cyclomatic complexity crosses the configured threshold (default is 20
).
Examples of incorrect code for a maximum of 2:
/*eslint complexity: ["error", 2]*/
function a(x) {
if (true) {
return x;
} else if (false) {
return x+1;
} else {
return 4; // 3rd path
}
}
Examples of correct code for a maximum of 2:
/*eslint complexity: ["error", 2]*/
function a(x) {
if (true) {
return x;
} else {
return 4;
}
}
Options
Optionally, you may specify a max
object property:
"complexity": ["error", 2]
is equivalent to
"complexity": ["error", { "max": 2 }]
Deprecated: the object property maximum
is deprecated. Please use the property max
instead.
When Not To Use It
If you can't determine an appropriate complexity limit for your code, then it's best to disable this rule.
Further Reading
Related Rules
- [max-depth](max-depth.md)
- [max-len](max-len.md)
- [max-nested-callbacks](max-nested-callbacks.md)
- [max-params](max-params.md)
- [max-statements](max-statements.md) Source: http://eslint.org/docs/rules/
Function _next
has a Cognitive Complexity of 18 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
_next() {
// Allow _next_ to be called
this._busy_ = false;
/* At this point the source is fully compiled
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function apply
has a Cognitive Complexity of 16 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
apply(name, context, args, callback) {
// Check for mapped task
if (!this.map.has(name)) {
callback(new Error('Task not found!'));
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method 'apply' has a complexity of 13. Open
apply(name, context, args, callback) {
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Limit Cyclomatic Complexity (complexity)
Cyclomatic complexity measures the number of linearly independent paths through a program's source code. This rule allows setting a cyclomatic complexity threshold.
function a(x) {
if (true) {
return x; // 1st path
} else if (false) {
return x+1; // 2nd path
} else {
return 4; // 3rd path
}
}
Rule Details
This rule is aimed at reducing code complexity by capping the amount of cyclomatic complexity allowed in a program. As such, it will warn when the cyclomatic complexity crosses the configured threshold (default is 20
).
Examples of incorrect code for a maximum of 2:
/*eslint complexity: ["error", 2]*/
function a(x) {
if (true) {
return x;
} else if (false) {
return x+1;
} else {
return 4; // 3rd path
}
}
Examples of correct code for a maximum of 2:
/*eslint complexity: ["error", 2]*/
function a(x) {
if (true) {
return x;
} else {
return 4;
}
}
Options
Optionally, you may specify a max
object property:
"complexity": ["error", 2]
is equivalent to
"complexity": ["error", { "max": 2 }]
Deprecated: the object property maximum
is deprecated. Please use the property max
instead.
When Not To Use It
If you can't determine an appropriate complexity limit for your code, then it's best to disable this rule.
Further Reading
Related Rules
- [max-depth](max-depth.md)
- [max-len](max-len.md)
- [max-nested-callbacks](max-nested-callbacks.md)
- [max-params](max-params.md)
- [max-statements](max-statements.md) Source: http://eslint.org/docs/rules/
Function apply
has 38 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
apply(name, context, args, callback) {
// Check for mapped task
if (!this.map.has(name)) {
callback(new Error('Task not found!'));
Function ST__CREATE_CONTEXT_P
has 35 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
module.exports = function ST__CREATE_CONTEXT_P(context, type) {
if (type === ST_NONE) return context;
switch(type) {
case ST_RESTRICTED:
// Allow stream module
Function _next
has 33 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
_next() {
// Allow _next_ to be called
this._busy_ = false;
/* At this point the source is fully compiled
Function _compile
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
_compile(task, context) {
// Check if script is not compiled
if (typeof task.func === 'string') {
// Compile script using VM
task.func = new vm.Script(task.func);
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
globals(_globals_) {
if(_globals_ !== undefined) this.model.globals = _globals_;
return this.model.globals;
}
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 47.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
permission(_permission_) {
if(_permission_ !== undefined) this.model.access = _permission_;
return this.model.access;
}
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 47.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
else return callback(new Error("Unknown error occurred. Failed to compile and execution was halted."));
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return callback(e);
The body of a for-in should be wrapped in an if statement to filter unwanted properties from the prototype. Open
for (let key in task.context) {
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Require Guarding for-in (guard-for-in)
Looping over objects with a for in
loop will include properties that are inherited through the prototype chain. This behavior can lead to unexpected items in your for loop.
for (key in foo) {
doSomething(key);
}
Note that simply checking foo.hasOwnProperty(key)
is likely to cause an error in some cases; see [no-prototype-builtins](no-prototype-builtins.md).
Rule Details
This rule is aimed at preventing unexpected behavior that could arise from using a for in
loop without filtering the results in the loop. As such, it will warn when for in
loops do not filter their results with an if
statement.
Examples of incorrect code for this rule:
/*eslint guard-for-in: "error"*/
for (key in foo) {
doSomething(key);
}
Examples of correct code for this rule:
/*eslint guard-for-in: "error"*/
for (key in foo) {
if (Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty.call(foo, key)) {
doSomething(key);
}
if ({}.hasOwnProperty.call(foo, key)) {
doSomething(key);
}
}
Related Rules
- [no-prototype-builtins](no-prototype-builtins.md)
Further Reading
Unexpected require(). Open
return require(name);
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Enforce require() on the top-level module scope (global-require)
In Node.js, module dependencies are included using the require()
function, such as:
var fs = require("fs");
While require()
may be called anywhere in code, some style guides prescribe that it should be called only in the top level of a module to make it easier to identify dependencies. For instance, it's arguably harder to identify dependencies when they are deeply nested inside of functions and other statements:
function foo() {
if (condition) {
var fs = require("fs");
}
}
Since require()
does a synchronous load, it can cause performance problems when used in other locations.
Further, ES6 modules mandate that import
and export
statements can only occur in the top level of the module's body.
Rule Details
This rule requires all calls to require()
to be at the top level of the module, similar to ES6 import
and export
statements, which also can occur only at the top level.
Examples of incorrect code for this rule:
/*eslint global-require: "error"*/
/*eslint-env es6*/
// calling require() inside of a function is not allowed
function readFile(filename, callback) {
var fs = require('fs');
fs.readFile(filename, callback)
}
// conditional requires like this are also not allowed
if (DEBUG) { require('debug'); }
// a require() in a switch statement is also flagged
switch(x) { case '1': require('1'); break; }
// you may not require() inside an arrow function body
var getModule = (name) => require(name);
// you may not require() inside of a function body as well
function getModule(name) { return require(name); }
// you may not require() inside of a try/catch block
try {
require(unsafeModule);
} catch(e) {
console.log(e);
}
Examples of correct code for this rule:
/*eslint global-require: "error"*/
// all these variations of require() are ok
require('x');
var y = require('y');
var z;
z = require('z').initialize();
// requiring a module and using it in a function is ok
var fs = require('fs');
function readFile(filename, callback) {
fs.readFile(filename, callback)
}
// you can use a ternary to determine which module to require
var logger = DEBUG ? require('dev-logger') : require('logger');
// if you want you can require() at the end of your module
function doSomethingA() {}
function doSomethingB() {}
var x = require("x"),
z = require("z");
When Not To Use It
If you have a module that must be initialized with information that comes from the file-system or if a module is only used in very rare situations and will cause significant overhead to load it may make sense to disable the rule. If you need to require()
an optional dependency inside of a try
/catch
, you can disable this rule for just that dependency using the // eslint-disable-line global-require
comment.
Source: http://eslint.org/docs/rules/