Method normalize_spelling
has a Cognitive Complexity of 41 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.normalize_spelling(name)
if name
name = name.split.map do |token|
if token[/\A(cat|caat|categpry|categroy|cateogry|categegory|catgory|caegory|ct)\.?\z/i]
"Category"
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method normalize_spelling
has 92 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.normalize_spelling(name)
if name
name = name.split.map do |token|
if token[/\A(cat|caat|categpry|categroy|cateogry|categegory|catgory|caegory|ct)\.?\z/i]
"Category"
File name_normalization.rb
has 314 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
module Categories
module NameNormalization
extend ActiveSupport::Concern
RACING_ASSOCIATIONS = %w[ ABA ATRA CBRA GBRA MBRA NABRA OBRA WSBA ].freeze
Consider simplifying this complex logical expression. Open
elsif token[/\Amaster\z/i] || token[/\Amas\z/i] || token[/\Amstr?\z/i] || token[/\Amaster's\z/i] ||
token[/\Amast.?\z/i] || token[/\Amaasters\z/i] || token[/\Amastes\z/i] || token[/\Amastres\z/i] ||
token[/\Amater\z/i] || token[/\Amaser\z/i] || token[/\Amst\z/i]
"Masters"
Method normalize_case
has a Cognitive Complexity of 15 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.normalize_case(name)
if name
name = name.split.map do |token|
# Calling RacingAssociation.current triggers an infinite loop
if token[/of/i]
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method normalize_ability_punctuation
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.normalize_ability_punctuation(name)
# Don't combine Junior Men 9-12 3/4/5
return name if name[%r{\d-1\d \d/\d/\d}]
5.downto(2).each do |length|
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Consider simplifying this complex logical expression. Open
elsif token[/\Abeg?\.?\z/i] || token[/\Abg\.?\z/i] || token[/\Abegin?\.?\z/i] || token[/\Abeginners\z/i] || token[/\Abeg:\z/i] ||
token[/\ABeginning\z/i]
"Beginner"
elsif token[/\A(exp|expt|ex|exeprt|exb|exper|exprert)\.?\z/i]
Method normalize_punctuation
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.normalize_punctuation(name)
if name
# trailing punctuation
name = name.gsub(%r{[/:.,"]\z}, "")
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method split_camelcase
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.split_camelcase(name)
return name if name.nil?
unless name.downcase == name || name.upcase == name
name = name.gsub(/([A-Z\d]+)([A-Z][a-z])/, '\1 \2')
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method replace_roman_numeral_categories
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.replace_roman_numeral_categories(name)
if name
name = name.split.map do |token|
case token
when "I"
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
name.gsub(/junior m /i, "Junior Men ")
.gsub(/Espior/i, "Espoir ")
.gsub(/(\d+) (and|&) U\z/i, 'U\1')
.gsub(/(\d+)& U\z/i, 'U\1')
.gsub(/under (\d{2,3})/i, 'U\1')
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 28.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76