Showing 10 of 11 total issues
Function refer
has a Cognitive Complexity of 61 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function refer(this: any, options: ReferOptions) {
const seneca: any = this
const genToken = this.util.Nid(options.token)
const genCode = this.util.Nid(options.code)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
File refer.ts
has 396 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
/* Copyright © 2022 Seneca Project Contributors, MIT License. */
type ReferOptions = {
debug?: boolean
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if (rule.where.kind === 'accept') {
rule.call.forEach((callmsg: any) => {
callmsg.ent = seneca.entity(rule.ent)
callmsg.entry_id = msg.q.entry_id
callmsg.entry_kind = msg.q.entry_kind
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 101.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if (rule.where.kind === 'lost' && msg.q.kind === 'accept') {
rule.call.forEach((callmsg: any) => {
callmsg.ent = seneca.entity(rule.ent)
callmsg.email = msg.q.email
callmsg.userWinner = msg.q.user_id
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 101.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Function msgAcceptEntry
has 82 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
async function msgAcceptEntry(this: any, msg: any) {
const seneca = this
// If check=true, do not update occur
let check = true === msg.check ? true : false
Function msgCreateEntry
has 68 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
async function msgCreateEntry(this: any, msg: any) {
const seneca = this
// Sending user, not required
let user_id = msg.user_id
Function msgLoadRules
has 36 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
async function msgLoadRules(this: any, msg: any) {
const seneca = this
const rules = await seneca.entity('refer/rule').list$()
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return {
ok: false,
why: 'entry-used',
}
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return {
ok: false,
why: 'entry-limit',
details: {
limit: entry.limit,
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return {
ok: true,
entry,
occur, // NOTE: will be undef if check=true
}