Sign upLogin

sensu-plugins/sensu-plugins-sensu

View on GitHub
Star
bin/check-aggregate.rb

Summary

Maintainability
D
1 day
Test Coverage

File check-aggregate.rb has 294 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

require 'sensu-plugin/check/cli'
require 'rest-client'
require 'json'

class CheckAggregate < Sensu::Plugin::Check::CLI
Severity: Minor
Found in bin/check-aggregate.rb - About 3 hrs to fix

    Method aggregate_results has a Cognitive Complexity of 14 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

      def aggregate_results
    uri = "/aggregates/#{config[:check]}"
    issued = api_request(uri + "?age=#{config[:age]}" + (config[:limit] ? "&limit=#{config[:limit]}" : ''))
    unless issued.empty?
      issued_sorted = issued.sort
    Severity: Minor
    Found in bin/check-aggregate.rb - About 1 hr to fix

    Cognitive Complexity

    Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

    A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

    • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
    • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
    • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

    Further reading

    Method compare_pattern has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

      def compare_pattern(aggregate)
    regex = Regexp.new(config[:pattern])
    mappings = {}
    message = config[:message] || 'One of these is not like the others!'
    if config[:debug]
    Severity: Minor
    Found in bin/check-aggregate.rb - About 1 hr to fix

    Cognitive Complexity

    Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

    A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

    • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
    • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
    • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

    Further reading

    Method run has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

      def run
    threshold = config[:critical] || config[:warning]
    threshold_count = config[:critical_count] || config[:warning_count]
    pattern = config[:summarize] && config[:pattern]
    critical 'Misconfiguration: critical || warning || (summarize && pattern) must be set' unless threshold || pattern || threshold_count
    Severity: Minor
    Found in bin/check-aggregate.rb - About 1 hr to fix

    Cognitive Complexity

    Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

    A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

    • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
    • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
    • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

    Further reading

    Method compare_thresholds_count has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

      def compare_thresholds_count(aggregate)
    message = config[:message] || 'Number of nodes down exceeds threshold'
    message += " (%s out of #{aggregate[:total]} nodes reporting %s)"
    message += "\n" + aggregate[:outputs] if aggregate[:outputs]
    if config[:debug]
    Severity: Minor
    Found in bin/check-aggregate.rb - About 1 hr to fix

    Cognitive Complexity

    Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

    A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

    • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
    • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
    • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

    Further reading

    Method compare_thresholds has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

      def compare_thresholds(aggregate)
    message = config[:message] || 'Number of non-zero results exceeds threshold'
    message += ' (%d%% %s)'
    message += "\n" + aggregate[:outputs] if aggregate[:outputs]
    if config[:debug]
    Severity: Minor
    Found in bin/check-aggregate.rb - About 1 hr to fix

    Cognitive Complexity

    Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

    A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

    • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
    • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
    • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

    Further reading

    Method compare_stale has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

      def compare_stale(aggregate)
    message = config[:message] || 'Number of stale results exceeds threshold'
    message += " (%s out of #{aggregate[:total]} nodes reporting %s)"
    message += "\n" + aggregate[:outputs] if aggregate[:outputs]
    Severity: Minor
    Found in bin/check-aggregate.rb - About 45 mins to fix

    Cognitive Complexity

    Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

    A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

    • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
    • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
    • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

    Further reading

    Method honor_stash has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

      def honor_stash(aggregate)
    aggregate[:results].delete_if do |entry|
      begin
        api_request("/stashes/silence/#{entry[:client]}/#{config[:check]}")
        if entry[:status].zero?
    Severity: Minor
    Found in bin/check-aggregate.rb - About 35 mins to fix

    Cognitive Complexity

    Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

    A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

    • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
    • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
    • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

    Further reading

    Similar blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring.
    Open

          if config[:critical_count] && number_of_nodes_reporting_down >= config[:critical_count]
        critical format(message, number_of_nodes_reporting_down, 'not ok')
      elsif config[:warning_count] && number_of_nodes_reporting_down >= config[:warning_count]
        warning format(message, number_of_nodes_reporting_down, 'not ok')
      end
    Severity: Minor
    Found in bin/check-aggregate.rb and 3 other locations - About 25 mins to fix
    bin/check-aggregate.rb on lines 245..249
    bin/check-aggregate.rb on lines 253..257
    bin/check-aggregate.rb on lines 301..305

    Duplicated Code

    Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

    Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

    When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

    Tuning

    This issue has a mass of 30.

    We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

    The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

    If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

    See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

    Refactorings

    Further Reading

    Similar blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring.
    Open

          if config[:critical] && percent_critical >= config[:critical]
        critical format(message, percent_critical, 'critical')
      elsif config[:warning] && percent_warning >= config[:warning]
        warning format(message, percent_warning, 'warning')
      end
    Severity: Minor
    Found in bin/check-aggregate.rb and 3 other locations - About 25 mins to fix
    bin/check-aggregate.rb on lines 245..249
    bin/check-aggregate.rb on lines 292..296
    bin/check-aggregate.rb on lines 301..305

    Duplicated Code

    Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

    Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

    When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

    Tuning

    This issue has a mass of 30.

    We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

    The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

    If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

    See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

    Refactorings

    Further Reading

    Similar blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring.
    Open

          if config[:critical] && percent_non_zero >= config[:critical]
        critical format(message, percent_non_zero, 'non-zero')
      elsif config[:warning] && percent_non_zero >= config[:warning]
        warning format(message, percent_non_zero, 'non-zero')
      end
    Severity: Minor
    Found in bin/check-aggregate.rb and 3 other locations - About 25 mins to fix
    bin/check-aggregate.rb on lines 253..257
    bin/check-aggregate.rb on lines 292..296
    bin/check-aggregate.rb on lines 301..305

    Duplicated Code

    Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

    Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

    When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

    Tuning

    This issue has a mass of 30.

    We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

    The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

    If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

    See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

    Refactorings

    Further Reading

    Similar blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring.
    Open

          if config[:critical_count] && nodes_reporting_critical >= config[:critical_count]
        critical format(message, nodes_reporting_critical, 'critical')
      elsif config[:warning_count] && nodes_reporting_warning >= config[:warning_count]
        warning format(message, nodes_reporting_warning, 'warning')
      end
    Severity: Minor
    Found in bin/check-aggregate.rb and 3 other locations - About 25 mins to fix
    bin/check-aggregate.rb on lines 245..249
    bin/check-aggregate.rb on lines 253..257
    bin/check-aggregate.rb on lines 292..296

    Duplicated Code

    Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

    Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

    When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

    Tuning

    This issue has a mass of 30.

    We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

    The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

    If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

    See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

    Refactorings

    Further Reading

    There are no issues that match your filters.

    Category
    Status