Sign upLogin

sertansenturk/tomato

View on GitHub
Star

Showing 287 of 287 total issues

Function convertsymbtr2xml has a Cognitive Complexity of 198 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    def convertsymbtr2xml(self, verbose=None):
        if verbose is not None:
            self.verbose = verbose

        outkoddict = dict((e, 0) for e in kodlist)
Severity: Minor
Found in src/tomato/symbolic/symbtr/converter/symbtr2musicxml/symbtr2musicxml.py - About 4 days to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

                if self.are_close(pitch[i + 4][1], pitch[i + 5][1]) and \
                        self.are_close(pitch[i + 5][1], pitch[i + 6][1]):
                    if not self.are_close(pitch[i][1], pitch[i - 1][1]) and \
                            not self.are_close(pitch[i][1], pitch[i + 4][1]):
                        pitch[i][1] = pitch[i - 1][1]
Severity: Major
Found in src/tomato/audio/pitchfilter.py and 2 other locations - About 3 days to fix
src/tomato/audio/pitchfilter.py on lines 219..228
src/tomato/audio/pitchfilter.py on lines 231..240

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 365.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

                if self.are_close(pitch[i + 3][1], pitch[i + 4][1]) \
                        and self.are_close(pitch[i + 4][1], pitch[i + 5][1]):
                    if not self.are_close(pitch[i][1], pitch[i - 1][1]) \
                            and not self.are_close(pitch[i][1],
                                                   pitch[i + 3][1]):
Severity: Major
Found in src/tomato/audio/pitchfilter.py and 2 other locations - About 3 days to fix
src/tomato/audio/pitchfilter.py on lines 208..216
src/tomato/audio/pitchfilter.py on lines 231..240

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 365.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

                if self.are_close(pitch[i + 2][1], pitch[i + 3][1]) and \
                        self.are_close(pitch[i + 3][1], pitch[i + 4][1]):
                    if not self.are_close(pitch[i][1], pitch[i - 1][1]) and \
                            not self.are_close(pitch[i][1], pitch[i + 2][1]):
                        pitch[i][1] = pitch[i - 1][1]
Severity: Major
Found in src/tomato/audio/pitchfilter.py and 2 other locations - About 3 days to fix
src/tomato/audio/pitchfilter.py on lines 208..216
src/tomato/audio/pitchfilter.py on lines 219..228

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 365.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

    if temp_pay_payda >= 1.0:
        n_type.text = 'whole'
        temp_undotted = 1.0
    elif 1.0 > temp_pay_payda >= 1.0 / 2:
        n_type.text = 'half'
Severity: Major
Found in src/tomato/symbolic/symbtr/converter/symbtr2musicxml/symbtr2musicxml.py and 1 other location - About 2 days to fix
src/tomato/symbolic/symbtr/converter/symbtr2musicxml/symbtrnote.py on lines 180..200

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 274.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

        if temp_pay_payda >= 1.0:
            self.type = 'whole'
            temp_undotted = 1.0
        elif 1.0 > temp_pay_payda >= 1.0 / 2:
            self.type = 'half'
Severity: Major
Found in src/tomato/symbolic/symbtr/converter/symbtr2musicxml/symbtrnote.py and 1 other location - About 2 days to fix
src/tomato/symbolic/symbtr/converter/symbtr2musicxml/symbtr2musicxml.py on lines 30..50

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 274.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

File symbtr2musicxml.py has 792 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

import copy
import os

from lxml import etree
Severity: Major
Found in src/tomato/symbolic/symbtr/converter/symbtr2musicxml/symbtr2musicxml.py - About 1 day to fix

    Cyclomatic complexity is too high in method convertsymbtr2xml. (74)
    Open

        def convertsymbtr2xml(self, verbose=None):
        if verbose is not None:
            self.verbose = verbose

        outkoddict = dict((e, 0) for e in kodlist)
    Severity: Minor
    Found in src/tomato/symbolic/symbtr/converter/symbtr2musicxml/symbtr2musicxml.py by radon

    Cyclomatic Complexity

    Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

    Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

    Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
    if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
    elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
    else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
    for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
    while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
    except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
    finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
    with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
    assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
    Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
    Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

    Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

    Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
    Open

                if self.are_close(pitch[i - 1][1], pitch[i - 2][1]) and \
                    self.are_close(pitch[i - 2][1], pitch[i - 3][1]) and \
                    self.are_close(pitch[i - 3][1], pitch[i - 4][1]):
    Severity: Major
    Found in src/tomato/audio/pitchfilter.py and 1 other location - About 1 day to fix
    src/tomato/audio/pitchfilter.py on lines 203..205

    Duplicated Code

    Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

    Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

    When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

    Tuning

    This issue has a mass of 136.

    We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

    The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

    If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

    See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

    Refactorings

    Further Reading

    Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
    Open

                if self.are_close(pitch[i - 4][1], pitch[i - 3][1]) and \
                    self.are_close(pitch[i - 3][1], pitch[i - 2][1]) and \
                    self.are_close(pitch[i - 2][1], pitch[i - 1][1]):
    Severity: Major
    Found in src/tomato/audio/pitchfilter.py and 1 other location - About 1 day to fix
    src/tomato/audio/pitchfilter.py on lines 256..258

    Duplicated Code

    Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

    Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

    When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

    Tuning

    This issue has a mass of 136.

    We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

    The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

    If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

    See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

    Refactorings

    Further Reading

    Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
    Open

            for a in audio_meta['artists']:
            choir_bool = (a['type'] == 'vocal' and
                          'attribute-list' in a.keys() and
                          'choir_vocals' in a['attribute-list'])
            if choir_bool:
    Severity: Major
    Found in src/tomato/metadata/instrumentation.py and 1 other location - About 7 hrs to fix
    src/tomato/metadata/instrumentation.py on lines 170..179

    Duplicated Code

    Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

    Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

    When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

    Tuning

    This issue has a mass of 112.

    We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

    The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

    If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

    See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

    Refactorings

    Further Reading

    Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
    Open

            for a in audio_meta['artists']:
            choir_bool = (a['type'] == 'vocal'
                          and 'attribute-list' in a.keys()
                          and 'choir_vocals' in a['attribute-list'])
            if choir_bool:
    Severity: Major
    Found in src/tomato/metadata/instrumentation.py and 1 other location - About 7 hrs to fix
    src/tomato/metadata/instrumentation.py on lines 38..47

    Duplicated Code

    Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

    Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

    When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

    Tuning

    This issue has a mass of 112.

    We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

    The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

    If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

    See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

    Refactorings

    Further Reading

    Function correct_jumps has a Cognitive Complexity of 43 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

        def correct_jumps(self, pitch):
        for i in range(4, len(pitch) - 6):
            if self.are_close(pitch[i - 4][1], pitch[i - 3][1]) and \
                    self.are_close(pitch[i - 3][1], pitch[i - 2][1]) and \
                    self.are_close(pitch[i - 2][1], pitch[i - 1][1]):
    Severity: Minor
    Found in src/tomato/audio/pitchfilter.py - About 6 hrs to fix

    Cognitive Complexity

    Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

    A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

    • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
    • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
    • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

    Further reading

    Function correct_octave_errors_by_chunks has a Cognitive Complexity of 42 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

        def correct_octave_errors_by_chunks(self, pitch):
        pitch_chunks = self.decompose_into_chunks(pitch=pitch)

        zero_chunks = []
        zero_ind = []
    Severity: Minor
    Found in src/tomato/audio/pitchfilter.py - About 6 hrs to fix

    Cognitive Complexity

    Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

    A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

    • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
    • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
    • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

    Further reading

    Function decompose_into_chunks has a Cognitive Complexity of 39 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

        def decompose_into_chunks(self, pitch):
        """
        decomposes the given pitch track into the chunks.
        """
        pitch_chunks = []
    Severity: Minor
    Found in src/tomato/audio/pitchfilter.py - About 5 hrs to fix

    Cognitive Complexity

    Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

    A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

    • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
    • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
    • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

    Further reading

    Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
    Open

                    if pitch[i + 1][1] == 0:
                    temp_pitch.append(pitch[i])
                    if i + 1 == len(pitch) - 1:  # last element
                        temp_pitch.append(pitch[i + 1])
                else:
    Severity: Major
    Found in src/tomato/audio/pitchfilter.py and 1 other location - About 5 hrs to fix
    src/tomato/audio/pitchfilter.py on lines 98..110

    Duplicated Code

    Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

    Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

    When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

    Tuning

    This issue has a mass of 96.

    We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

    The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

    If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

    See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

    Refactorings

    Further Reading

    Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
    Open

                    if (self.lower_interval_thres < interval <
                        self.upper_interval_thres):
                    temp_pitch.append(pitch[i])
                    if i + 1 == len(pitch) - 1:  # last element
                        temp_pitch.append(pitch[i + 1])
    Severity: Major
    Found in src/tomato/audio/pitchfilter.py and 1 other location - About 5 hrs to fix
    src/tomato/audio/pitchfilter.py on lines 83..94

    Duplicated Code

    Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

    Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

    When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

    Tuning

    This issue has a mass of 96.

    We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

    The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

    If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

    See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

    Refactorings

    Further Reading

    Cyclomatic complexity is too high in method correct_octave_errors_by_chunks. (30)
    Open

        def correct_octave_errors_by_chunks(self, pitch):
        pitch_chunks = self.decompose_into_chunks(pitch=pitch)

        zero_chunks = []
        zero_ind = []
    Severity: Minor
    Found in src/tomato/audio/pitchfilter.py by radon

    Cyclomatic Complexity

    Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

    Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

    Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
    if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
    elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
    else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
    for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
    while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
    except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
    finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
    with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
    assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
    Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
    Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

    Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

    Cyclomatic complexity is too high in method correct_jumps. (27)
    Open

        def correct_jumps(self, pitch):
        for i in range(4, len(pitch) - 6):
            if self.are_close(pitch[i - 4][1], pitch[i - 3][1]) and \
                    self.are_close(pitch[i - 3][1], pitch[i - 2][1]) and \
                    self.are_close(pitch[i - 2][1], pitch[i - 1][1]):
    Severity: Minor
    Found in src/tomato/audio/pitchfilter.py by radon

    Cyclomatic Complexity

    Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

    Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

    Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
    if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
    elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
    else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
    for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
    while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
    except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
    finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
    with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
    assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
    Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
    Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

    Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

    Cyclomatic complexity is too high in method _write_lilypond. (25)
    Open

        @classmethod
    def _write_lilypond(cls, measures, makam, usul, form, time_sigs,
                        keysig, render_metadata, work_title, composer,
                        lyricist):
        # connecting database, trying to get information for beams in lilypond
    Severity: Minor
    Found in src/tomato/symbolic/symbtr/converter/musicxml2lilypond/scoreconverter.py by radon

    Cyclomatic Complexity

    Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

    Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

    Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
    if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
    elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
    else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
    for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
    while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
    except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
    finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
    with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
    assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
    Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
    Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

    Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

    Severity
    Category
    Status
    Source
    Language