Showing 5 of 37 total issues
Method prepare_for_invocation
has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 8 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.prepare_for_invocation(name, value)
if name == :backend
if SUPPORTED_BACKENDS.include?(value)
require_relative "./backend_generators/#{value}_backend"
Mobility::BackendGenerators.const_get("#{value}_backend".camelcase.freeze)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method define_dirty_methods
has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 8 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def define_dirty_methods(attribute_names)
attribute_names.each do |name|
dirty_handler_methods.each_pattern(name) do |method_name, attribute_method|
define_method(method_name) do |*args|
# for %s_changed?(from:, to:) pattern
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method serializer_for
has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 8 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def serializer_for(format)
lambda do |obj|
return if obj.nil?
if obj.is_a? ::Hash
obj = obj.inject({}) do |translations, (locale, value)|
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method configure
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 8 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def configure(options)
table_name = model_class.table_name
options[:table_name] ||= "#{table_name.singularize}_translations"
options[:foreign_key] ||= table_name.classify.foreign_key
if (association_name = options[:association_name]).present?
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
end
at 117, 12 is not aligned with if
at 113, 10. Open
end
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks whether the end keywords are aligned properly.
Three modes are supported through the EnforcedStyleAlignWith
configuration parameter:
If it's set to keyword
(which is the default), the end
shall be aligned with the start of the keyword (if, class, etc.).
If it's set to variable
the end
shall be aligned with the
left-hand-side of the variable assignment, if there is one.
If it's set to start_of_line
, the end
shall be aligned with the
start of the line where the matching keyword appears.
Example: EnforcedStyleAlignWith: keyword (default)
# bad
variable = if true
end
# good
variable = if true
end
Example: EnforcedStyleAlignWith: variable
# bad
variable = if true
end
# good
variable = if true
end
Example: EnforcedStyleAlignWith: startofline
# bad
variable = if true
end
# good
puts(if true
end)