shioyama/mobility

View on GitHub

Showing 5 of 36 total issues

Method prepare_for_invocation has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 8 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    def self.prepare_for_invocation(name, value)
      if name == :backend
        if SUPPORTED_BACKENDS.include?(value)
          require_relative "./backend_generators/#{value}_backend"
          Mobility::BackendGenerators.const_get("#{value}_backend".camelcase.freeze)
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/rails/generators/mobility/translations_generator.rb - About 1 hr to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method define_dirty_methods has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 8 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

        def define_dirty_methods(attribute_names)
          attribute_names.each do |name|
            dirty_handler_methods.each_pattern(name) do |method_name, attribute_method|
              define_method(method_name) do |*args|
                # for %s_changed?(from:, to:) pattern
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/mobility/plugins/active_model/dirty.rb - About 45 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method serializer_for has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 8 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

        def serializer_for(format)
          lambda do |obj|
            return if obj.nil?
            if obj.is_a? ::Hash
              obj = obj.inject({}) do |translations, (locale, value)|
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/mobility/backends/serialized.rb - About 35 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method configure has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 8 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

        def configure(options)
          table_name = model_class.table_name
          options[:table_name]  ||= "#{table_name.singularize}_translations"
          options[:foreign_key] ||= table_name.downcase.singularize.camelize.foreign_key
          if (association_name = options[:association_name]).present?
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/mobility/backends/active_record/table.rb - About 25 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

end at 117, 12 is not aligned with if at 113, 10.
Open

            end

This cop checks whether the end keywords are aligned properly.

Three modes are supported through the EnforcedStyleAlignWith configuration parameter:

If it's set to keyword (which is the default), the end shall be aligned with the start of the keyword (if, class, etc.).

If it's set to variable the end shall be aligned with the left-hand-side of the variable assignment, if there is one.

If it's set to start_of_line, the end shall be aligned with the start of the line where the matching keyword appears.

Example: EnforcedStyleAlignWith: keyword (default)

# bad

variable = if true
    end

# good

variable = if true
           end

Example: EnforcedStyleAlignWith: variable

# bad

variable = if true
    end

# good

variable = if true
end

Example: EnforcedStyleAlignWith: startofline

# bad

variable = if true
    end

# good

puts(if true
end)
Severity
Category
Status
Source
Language