Showing 803 of 803 total issues
Similar blocks of code found in 42 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if(Ext.util.Format){
Ext.util.Format.date = function(v, format){
if(!v) return "";
if(!(v instanceof Date)) v = new Date(Date.parse(v));
return v.dateFormat(format || "y年m月d日");- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 94.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 42 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if(Ext.util.Format){
Ext.util.Format.date = function(v, format){
if(!v) return "";
if(!(v instanceof Date)) v = new Date(Date.parse(v));
return v.dateFormat(format || "d/m/Y");- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 94.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 42 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if(Ext.util.Format){
Ext.util.Format.date = function(v, format){
if(!v) return "";
if(!(v instanceof Date)) v = new Date(Date.parse(v));
return v.dateFormat(format || "Y-m-d");- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 94.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 42 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if(Ext.util.Format){
Ext.util.Format.date = function(v, format){
if(!v) return "";
if(!(v instanceof Date)) v = new Date(Date.parse(v));
return v.dateFormat(format || "Y/m/d");- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 94.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 42 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if(Ext.util.Format){
Ext.util.Format.date = function(v, format){
if(!v) return "";
if(!(v instanceof Date)) v = new Date(Date.parse(v));
return v.dateFormat(format || "d/m/Y");- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 94.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 42 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if(Ext.util.Format){
Ext.util.Format.date = function(v, format){
if(!v) return "";
if(!(v instanceof Date)) v = new Date(Date.parse(v));
return v.dateFormat(format || "Y m d");- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 94.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
File ext-lang-de.js has 288 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
/*!
* Ext JS Library 3.2.1
* Copyright(c) 2006-2010 Ext JS, Inc.
* licensing@extjs.com
* http://www.extjs.com/licenseFile ext-lang-lt.js has 288 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
/*!
* Ext JS Library 3.2.1
* Copyright(c) 2006-2010 Ext JS, Inc.
* licensing@extjs.com
* http://www.extjs.com/licenseFile application.js has 288 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Ext.BLANK_IMAGE_URL = BASE_URL + '/images/blank.gif';
Ext.state.Manager.setProvider(new Ext.state.CookieProvider());
Ext.QuickTips.init();
Ext.form.Field.prototype.msgTarget = 'side';
Ext.Ajax.timeout = 30 * 60 * 1000;Class VirtualServersController has 25 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
class Admin::VirtualServersController < Admin::Base
before_filter :superadmin_required, :only => [:list_data, :delete, :create, :clone, :migrate]
before_filter :set_server_by_id, :only => [ :clone, :migrate, :create_template, :get_properties, :get_stats, :get_limits ]
def listClass HardwareServer has 25 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
class HardwareServer < ActiveRecord::Base
include ApplicationHelper
attr_accessible :host, :auth_key, :description, :daemon_port, :use_ssl
validates_uniqueness_of :hostFile ext-lang-ru.js has 283 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
/*!
* Ext JS Library 3.2.1
* Copyright(c) 2006-2010 Ext JS, Inc.
* licensing@extjs.com
* http://www.extjs.com/licenseFile ext-lang-nl.js has 280 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
/*!
* Ext JS Library 3.2.1
* Copyright(c) 2006-2010 Ext JS, Inc.
* licensing@extjs.com
* http://www.extjs.com/licenseFile ext-lang-en_GB.js has 278 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
/*!
* Ext JS Library 3.2.1
* Copyright(c) 2006-2010 Ext JS, Inc.
* licensing@extjs.com
* http://www.extjs.com/licenseFile ext-lang-es.js has 275 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
/*!
* Ext JS Library 3.2.1
* Copyright(c) 2006-2010 Ext JS, Inc.
* licensing@extjs.com
* http://www.extjs.com/licenseFile ext-lang-ja.js has 274 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
/*!
* Ext JS Library 3.2.1
* Copyright(c) 2006-2010 Ext JS, Inc.
* licensing@extjs.com
* http://www.extjs.com/licenseFile ext-lang-ca.js has 273 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
/*!
* Ext JS Library 3.2.1
* Copyright(c) 2006-2010 Ext JS, Inc.
* licensing@extjs.com
* http://www.extjs.com/licenseFile hardware_server.rb has 270 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
class HardwareServer < ActiveRecord::Base
include ApplicationHelper
attr_accessible :host, :auth_key, :description, :daemon_port, :use_ssl
validates_uniqueness_of :hostMethod create_backup has a Cognitive Complexity of 18 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.create_backup(virtual_server, ve_state, description)
orig_ve_state = virtual_server.state
if 'running' == orig_ve_state
case ve_state
when 'suspend' then virtual_server.suspend- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method stat_details has a Cognitive Complexity of 18 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def stat_details
@virtual_server = VirtualServer.find_by_id(params[:id])
redirect_to :controller => 'dashboard' and return if !@virtual_server or !@current_user.can_control(@virtual_server)
@up_level = '/admin/virtual-servers/show?id=' + @virtual_server.id.to_s- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"