Showing 9,050 of 9,050 total issues
IIntegration
has 63 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
@SuppressWarnings({ "all", "unchecked", "rawtypes" })
public class IIntegration implements VertxPojo, IIIntegration {
private static final long serialVersionUID = 1L;
MAttributeRecord
has 63 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
@SuppressWarnings({ "all", "unchecked", "rawtypes" })
public class MAttributeRecord extends UpdatableRecordImpl<MAttributeRecord> implements VertxPojo, IMAttribute {
private static final long serialVersionUID = 1L;
Method equals
has a Cognitive Complexity of 58 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
@Override
public boolean equals(Object obj) {
if (this == obj)
return true;
if (obj == null)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method equals
has a Cognitive Complexity of 58 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
@Override
public boolean equals(Object obj) {
if (this == obj)
return true;
if (obj == null)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method equals
has a Cognitive Complexity of 58 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
@Override
public boolean equals(Object obj) {
if (this == obj)
return true;
if (obj == null)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method equals
has a Cognitive Complexity of 58 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
@Override
public boolean equals(Object obj) {
if (this == obj)
return true;
if (obj == null)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method equals
has a Cognitive Complexity of 58 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
@Override
public boolean equals(Object obj) {
if (this == obj)
return true;
if (obj == null)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
/*
* This file is generated by jOOQ.
*/
package cn.vertxup.battery.domain.tables;
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 554.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
/*
* This file is generated by jOOQ.
*/
package cn.vertxup.battery.domain.tables;
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 554.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
ECompanyDao
has 62 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
@SuppressWarnings({ "all", "unchecked", "rawtypes" })
public class ECompanyDao extends AbstractVertxDAO<ECompanyRecord, cn.vertxup.erp.domain.tables.pojos.ECompany, String, Future<List<cn.vertxup.erp.domain.tables.pojos.ECompany>>, Future<cn.vertxup.erp.domain.tables.pojos.ECompany>, Future<Integer>, Future<String>> implements io.github.jklingsporn.vertx.jooq.classic.VertxDAO<ECompanyRecord,cn.vertxup.erp.domain.tables.pojos.ECompany,String> {
/**
* @param configuration The Configuration used for rendering and query
IApiDao
has 62 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
@SuppressWarnings({ "all", "unchecked", "rawtypes" })
public class IApiDao extends AbstractVertxDAO<IApiRecord, cn.vertxup.jet.domain.tables.pojos.IApi, String, Future<List<cn.vertxup.jet.domain.tables.pojos.IApi>>, Future<cn.vertxup.jet.domain.tables.pojos.IApi>, Future<Integer>, Future<String>> implements io.github.jklingsporn.vertx.jooq.classic.VertxDAO<IApiRecord,cn.vertxup.jet.domain.tables.pojos.IApi,String> {
/**
* @param configuration The Configuration used for rendering and query
IBBlock
has 62 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
@SuppressWarnings({ "all", "unchecked", "rawtypes" })
public interface IBBlock extends VertxPojo, Serializable {
/**
* Setter for <code>DB_ETERNAL.B_BLOCK.KEY</code>. 「key」- 模块主键
PBuyItemDao
has 62 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
@SuppressWarnings({ "all", "unchecked", "rawtypes" })
public class PBuyItemDao extends AbstractVertxDAO<PBuyItemRecord, cn.vertxup.psi.domain.tables.pojos.PBuyItem, String, Future<List<cn.vertxup.psi.domain.tables.pojos.PBuyItem>>, Future<cn.vertxup.psi.domain.tables.pojos.PBuyItem>, Future<Integer>, Future<String>> implements io.github.jklingsporn.vertx.jooq.classic.VertxDAO<PBuyItemRecord,cn.vertxup.psi.domain.tables.pojos.PBuyItem,String> {
/**
* @param configuration The Configuration used for rendering and query
IPOutItem
has 62 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
@SuppressWarnings({ "all", "unchecked", "rawtypes" })
public interface IPOutItem extends VertxPojo, Serializable {
/**
* Setter for <code>DB_ETERNAL.P_OUT_ITEM.KEY</code>. 「key」- 出库明细主键
FBillItemDao
has 62 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
@SuppressWarnings({ "all", "unchecked", "rawtypes" })
public class FBillItemDao extends AbstractVertxDAO<FBillItemRecord, cn.vertxup.fm.domain.tables.pojos.FBillItem, String, Future<List<cn.vertxup.fm.domain.tables.pojos.FBillItem>>, Future<cn.vertxup.fm.domain.tables.pojos.FBillItem>, Future<Integer>, Future<String>> implements io.github.jklingsporn.vertx.jooq.classic.VertxDAO<FBillItemRecord,cn.vertxup.fm.domain.tables.pojos.FBillItem,String> {
/**
* @param configuration The Configuration used for rendering and query
IFInvoice
has 62 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
@SuppressWarnings({ "all", "unchecked", "rawtypes" })
public interface IFInvoice extends VertxPojo, Serializable {
/**
* Setter for <code>DB_ETERNAL.F_INVOICE.KEY</code>. 「key」- 发票主键
IIIntegration
has 62 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
@SuppressWarnings({ "all", "unchecked", "rawtypes" })
public interface IIIntegration extends VertxPojo, Serializable {
/**
* Setter for <code>DB_ETERNAL.I_INTEGRATION.KEY</code>. 「key」- 集成配置主键
Builder
has 62 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public static final class Builder extends
com.google.protobuf.GeneratedMessageV3.Builder<Builder> implements
// @@protoc_insertion_point(builder_implements:io.vertx.mod.ipc.eon.IpcRequest)
io.vertx.mod.ipc.eon.IpcRequestOrBuilder {
private int responseFormat_ = 0;
WFlow
has 61 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
@SuppressWarnings({ "all", "unchecked", "rawtypes" })
public class WFlow implements VertxPojo, IWFlow {
private static final long serialVersionUID = 1L;
IJob
has 61 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
@SuppressWarnings({ "all", "unchecked", "rawtypes" })
public class IJob implements VertxPojo, IIJob {
private static final long serialVersionUID = 1L;