Showing 9,050 of 9,050 total issues
Method clazz
has a Cognitive Complexity of 35 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
static Class<?> clazz(final String name, final Class<?> instanceCls, final ClassLoader loader) {
if (TIs.isNil(name)) {
return instanceCls;
} else {
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
File UiLayoutRecord.java
has 383 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
/*
* This file is generated by jOOQ.
*/
package cn.vertxup.ui.domain.tables.records;
File TVendorAssessmentRecord.java
has 383 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
/*
* This file is generated by jOOQ.
*/
package cn.vertxup.erp.domain.tables.records;
File TVendorHourRecord.java
has 383 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
/*
* This file is generated by jOOQ.
*/
package cn.vertxup.erp.domain.tables.records;
File TOaTripRecord.java
has 383 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
/*
* This file is generated by jOOQ.
*/
package cn.vertxup.erp.domain.tables.records;
File OUserRecord.java
has 382 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
/*
* This file is generated by jOOQ.
*/
package cn.vertxup.rbac.domain.tables.records;
_To
has 39 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
class _To extends _Serialize {
protected _To() {
}
/**
GEdge
has 39 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
@SuppressWarnings({ "all", "unchecked", "rawtypes" })
public class GEdge implements VertxPojo, IGEdge {
private static final long serialVersionUID = 1L;
XActivityChange
has 39 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
@SuppressWarnings({ "all", "unchecked", "rawtypes" })
public class XActivityChange implements VertxPojo, IXActivityChange {
private static final long serialVersionUID = 1L;
XTabular
has 39 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
@SuppressWarnings({ "all", "unchecked", "rawtypes" })
public class XTabular implements VertxPojo, IXTabular {
private static final long serialVersionUID = 1L;
PCommodityHis
has 39 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
@SuppressWarnings({ "all", "unchecked", "rawtypes" })
public class PCommodityHis implements VertxPojo, IPCommodityHis {
private static final long serialVersionUID = 1L;
Builder
has 39 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public static final class Builder extends
com.google.protobuf.GeneratedMessageV3.Builder<Builder> implements
// @@protoc_insertion_point(builder_implements:io.vertx.mod.ipc.eon.IpcResponse)
io.vertx.mod.ipc.eon.IpcResponseOrBuilder {
public static final com.google.protobuf.Descriptors.Descriptor
Method equals
has 128 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
@Override
public boolean equals(Object obj) {
if (this == obj)
return true;
if (obj == null)
Method equals
has 128 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
@Override
public boolean equals(Object obj) {
if (this == obj)
return true;
if (obj == null)
Method equals
has 128 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
@Override
public boolean equals(Object obj) {
if (this == obj)
return true;
if (obj == null)
Method equals
has 128 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
@Override
public boolean equals(Object obj) {
if (this == obj)
return true;
if (obj == null)
Method equals
has 128 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
@Override
public boolean equals(Object obj) {
if (this == obj)
return true;
if (obj == null)
Method equals
has 128 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
@Override
public boolean equals(Object obj) {
if (this == obj)
return true;
if (obj == null)
Method equals
has 128 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
@Override
public boolean equals(Object obj) {
if (this == obj)
return true;
if (obj == null)
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
@Override
public void from(IPBuyOrder from) {
setKey(from.getKey());
setSerial(from.getSerial());
setType(from.getType());
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 316.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76