Showing 9,050 of 9,050 total issues
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
/*
* This file is generated by jOOQ.
*/
package cn.vertxup.fm.domain;
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 226.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Method vT
has a Cognitive Complexity of 25 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
@SuppressWarnings("unchecked")
static <T> T vT(final String literal, final Class<?> type) {
if (TIs.isNil(literal)) {
return null;
}
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method transform
has a Cognitive Complexity of 25 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public static Condition transform(final JsonObject filters,
Operator operator,
final Function<String, Field> fnAnalyze,
final Function<String, String> fnTable) {
final Condition condition;
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method validateContained
has a Cognitive Complexity of 25 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
static Envelop validateContained(final Class<?> clazz, final JsonObject data, final Set<String> paramContained) {
Envelop envelop = null;
if (null != paramContained && !paramContained.isEmpty()) {
final JetThanatos verifier = JetThanatos.create(clazz);
final Object value = data.getValue(KWeb.ARGS.PARAM_BODY);
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
File UiFieldRecord.java
has 314 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
/*
* This file is generated by jOOQ.
*/
package cn.vertxup.ui.domain.tables.records;
File UiViewRecord.java
has 314 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
/*
* This file is generated by jOOQ.
*/
package cn.vertxup.ui.domain.tables.records;
File SResourceRecord.java
has 314 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
/*
* This file is generated by jOOQ.
*/
package cn.vertxup.rbac.domain.tables.records;
File SVisitantRecord.java
has 314 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
/*
* This file is generated by jOOQ.
*/
package cn.vertxup.rbac.domain.tables.records;
File XCategoryRecord.java
has 314 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
/*
* This file is generated by jOOQ.
*/
package cn.vertxup.ambient.domain.tables.records;
File XAppRecord.java
has 314 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
/*
* This file is generated by jOOQ.
*/
package cn.vertxup.ambient.domain.tables.records;
File TplModelRecord.java
has 314 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
/*
* This file is generated by jOOQ.
*/
package cn.vertxup.tpl.domain.tables.records;
File IPortfolioRecord.java
has 314 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
/*
* This file is generated by jOOQ.
*/
package cn.vertxup.integration.domain.tables.records;
LCity
has 29 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
@SuppressWarnings({ "all", "unchecked", "rawtypes" })
public class LCity implements VertxPojo, ILCity {
private static final long serialVersionUID = 1L;
LFloor
has 29 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
@SuppressWarnings({ "all", "unchecked", "rawtypes" })
public class LFloor implements VertxPojo, ILFloor {
private static final long serialVersionUID = 1L;
LRegion
has 29 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
@SuppressWarnings({ "all", "unchecked", "rawtypes" })
public class LRegion implements VertxPojo, ILRegion {
private static final long serialVersionUID = 1L;
LYard
has 29 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
@SuppressWarnings({ "all", "unchecked", "rawtypes" })
public class LYard implements VertxPojo, ILYard {
private static final long serialVersionUID = 1L;
BComponent
has 29 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
@SuppressWarnings({ "all", "unchecked", "rawtypes" })
public class BComponent implements VertxPojo, IBComponent {
private static final long serialVersionUID = 1L;
BAuthority
has 29 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
@SuppressWarnings({ "all", "unchecked", "rawtypes" })
public class BAuthority implements VertxPojo, IBAuthority {
private static final long serialVersionUID = 1L;
BWeb
has 29 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
@SuppressWarnings({ "all", "unchecked", "rawtypes" })
public class BWeb implements VertxPojo, IBWeb {
private static final long serialVersionUID = 1L;
Builder
has 29 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public static final class Builder extends
com.google.protobuf.GeneratedMessageV3.Builder<Builder> implements
// @@protoc_insertion_point(builder_implements:io.vertx.mod.ipc.eon.StreamClientRequest)
io.vertx.mod.ipc.eon.StreamClientRequestOrBuilder {
public static final com.google.protobuf.Descriptors.Descriptor