Showing 175 of 175 total issues
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
def send_email_on_create
user_address = @instructable.user.email
admin_addresses = User.where(admin: true).pluck(:email)
admin_addresses -= [user_address]
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 63.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if subentries.count > 0
need_new_page = true
subentries.sort! { |a, b| a[:start_time].to_i <=> b[:start_time].to_i }
render_extra(pdf,
entries: subentries,
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 61.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if subentries.count > 0
need_new_page = true
subentries.sort! { |a, b| a[:start_time].to_i <=> b[:start_time].to_i }
render_extra(pdf,
entries: subentries,
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 61.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Method render_pdf
has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def render_pdf
@pdf = Prawn::Document.new(page_size: 'LETTER', page_layout: :portrait,
:compress => true, :optimize_objects => true,
:info => {
:Title => "Pennsic University #{Pennsic.year} Instructor Signup",
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method render
has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def render(pdf, opts)
debug = false
if debug
pdf.stroke_axis
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method kingdom_war_points
has 35 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def kingdom_war_points
respond_to do |format|
format.csv {
ret = CSV.generate do |csv|
Method render_topic_list
has 35 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def render_topic_list(pdf, instructables)
pdf.move_down 8 unless pdf.cursor == pdf.bounds.top
pdf.font_size 14
pdf.text instructables.first.topic
pdf.font_size PDF_FONT_SIZE
Function moveMonth
has 33 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
moveMonth: function (date, dir) {
if (!dir) return date;
var new_date = new Date(date.valueOf()),
day = new_date.getUTCDate(),
month = new_date.getUTCMonth(),
Method sanitize_changes
has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.sanitize_changes(list)
data = JSON::load list.to_json
keys = data.keys
keys.each do |key|
if data[key].is_a?Array
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method draw_location_labels
has 31 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def draw_location_labels(pdf, opts)
opts[:location_labels].each_with_index do |label, labelindex|
y1 = @header_height + labelindex * @row_height
x1 = 0
y2 = y1 + @row_height - 1
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if (meridian != meridianOld) {
if (meridianOld != '') {
html.push('</fieldset>');
}
html.push('<fieldset class="minute"><legend>' + meridian.toUpperCase() + '</legend>');
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 59.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if (meridian != meridianOld) {
if (meridianOld != '') {
html.push('</fieldset>');
}
html.push('<fieldset class="hour"><legend>' + meridian.toUpperCase() + '</legend>');
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 59.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Function place
has 30 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
place: function () {
if (this.isInline) return;
var index_highest = 0;
$('div').each(function () {
Method check_for_proofread_changes
has 30 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def check_for_proofread_changes
return true if @is_proofreader and @is_proofreader == :no_really
needs_clearing = false
changes.keys.each do |field_name|
Method index
has 30 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def index
@allowed_tracks = Instructable::TRACKS.keys
@track = params[:track]
@proofread = params[:proofread]
Method show
has 29 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def show
render_options = {}
date = params[:id]
Method interesting_change
has 28 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.interesting_change(change, start_date, end_date)
action = change[:action]
ret = []
Method changes_for_instances
has 28 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.changes_for_instances(original, current)
original_ids = original.map(&:id)
current_ids = current.map(&:id)
ret = []
Method recursive_changes
has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.recursive_changes(item)
new_counter = 0
changes = item.changes.dup
nested_names = item.nested_attributes_options.keys
nested_names.each do |nested_name|
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method render_csv
has 27 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def render_csv(options, filename)
@options = options
@options = {} if @options.nil?
column_names = %w(