Showing 821 of 821 total issues
Method validServiceName
has a Cognitive Complexity of 14 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public boolean validServiceName(String str) {
if (str == null || str.length() == 0) return false;
if (str.startsWith(".") || str.startsWith("_") || str.startsWith("-")
|| str.contains("..")
|| str.endsWith(".") || str.endsWith("_") || str.endsWith("-")) return false;
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method publish
has a Cognitive Complexity of 14 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
@Override
public void publish(String topic, int partition, Map<String, String> headers, Object body) throws IOException {
ConnectorConfig.validateTopicName(topic);
Utility util = Utility.getInstance();
Map<String, String> eventHeaders = headers == null? new HashMap<>() : headers;
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method hasRsvpRights
has a Cognitive Complexity of 14 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private boolean hasRsvpRights() {
Utility util = Utility.getInstance();
long now = System.currentTimeMillis();
String me = Platform.getInstance().getOrigin();
// remove expired bids
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method handleEvent
has a Cognitive Complexity of 14 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
@Override
@SuppressWarnings("unchecked")
public Object handleEvent(Map<String, String> headers, Object body, int instance) {
String type = headers.get(TYPE);
if (INFO.equals(type)) {
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method clearStalledConnection
has a Cognitive Complexity of 14 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public static void clearStalledConnection() {
List<String> pendingList = new ArrayList<>(pendingConnections.keySet());
long now = System.currentTimeMillis();
for (String route: pendingList) {
WsMetadata md = connections.get(route);
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
private String getHeaderCase(String header) {
StringBuilder sb = new StringBuilder();
List<String> parts = Utility.getInstance().split(header, "-");
for (String p: parts) {
sb.append(p.substring(0, 1).toUpperCase());
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 114.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
public int bytes2int(byte[] b) {
if (b == null || b.length != 4) return -1;
int val = 0;
for (int i=0 ; i < 4; ++i) {
val *= 256L ;
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 114.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
public String getHeaderCase(String header) {
StringBuilder sb = new StringBuilder();
List<String> parts = Utility.getInstance().split(header, "-");
for (String p: parts) {
sb.append(p.substring(0, 1).toUpperCase());
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 114.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
public long bytes2long(byte[] b) {
if (b == null || b.length != 8) return -1;
long val = 0;
for (int i=0 ; i < 8; ++i) {
val *= 256L ;
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 114.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Method sendResponse
has 42 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public void sendResponse(String type, String requestId, HttpServerRequest request, int status, String message) {
ServiceGateway.closeContext(requestId);
String accept = request.getHeader(ACCEPT);
if (accept == null) {
accept = "?";
Method load
has 42 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
@SuppressWarnings("unchecked")
public void load(String path) throws IOException {
InputStream in = null;
if (path.startsWith(CLASSPATH)) {
in = ConfigReader.class.getResourceAsStream(path.substring(CLASSPATH.length()));
Method createTopic
has 42 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private void createTopic(String topic, int partitions) throws IOException {
if (topicSubstitution) {
if (preAllocatedTopics.get(topic) == null) {
throw new IllegalArgumentException("Missing topic substitution for "+topic);
}
Method getEnv
has 42 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private Map<String, Object> getEnv() {
Map<String, Object> result = new HashMap<>();
Utility util = Utility.getInstance();
AppConfigReader reader = AppConfigReader.getInstance();
List<String> envVars = util.split(reader.getProperty(SHOW_ENV, ""), ", ");
Method start
has 42 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public void start() throws IOException {
final boolean requireInitialization = offset == INITIALIZE;
if (requireInitialization) {
ServiceLifeCycle initialLoad = new ServiceLifeCycle(topic, partition, INIT_TOKEN);
initialLoad.start();
Method start
has 42 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public void start() throws IOException {
final boolean requireInitialization = offset == INITIALIZE;
if (requireInitialization) {
ServiceLifeCycle initialLoad = new ServiceLifeCycle(topic, partition, INIT_TOKEN);
initialLoad.start();
Method suspendResume
has 41 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private void suspendResume(String requestId, HttpServerRequest request) {
PostOffice po = PostOffice.getInstance();
SimpleHttpUtility httpUtil = SimpleHttpUtility.getInstance();
String origin = request.getHeader(APP_INSTANCE);
if (origin == null) {
Method sendResponse
has 41 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public static void sendResponse(HttpServletResponse response, int status, String message, String uri, String accept)
throws IOException {
if (template == null) {
template = util.stream2str(HttpErrorHandler.class.getResourceAsStream(TEMPLATE));
}
Method handleEvent
has 41 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
@Override
public Object handleEvent(Map<String, String> headers, Object body, int instance) throws Exception {
if (headers.containsKey(TYPE)) {
if (LIST.equals(headers.get(TYPE))) {
return listTopics();
Method handleEvent
has 41 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
@Override
public Object handleEvent(Map<String, String> headers, Object body, int instance) throws Exception {
if (headers.containsKey(TYPE)) {
if (LIST.equals(headers.get(TYPE))) {
return listTopics();
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
private ConfigReader getConfig() throws IOException {
AppConfigReader reader = AppConfigReader.getInstance();
List<String> paths = Utility.getInstance().split(reader.getProperty("cron.yaml",
"file:/tmp/config/cron.yaml, classpath:/cron.yaml"), ", ");
for (String p: paths) {
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 107.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76