Sign upLogin

smok-serwis/coolamqp

View on GitHub
Star
coolamqp/framing/compilation/textcode_fields.py

Summary

Maintainability
D
1 day
Test Coverage
D
62%

Function get_from_buffer has a Cognitive Complexity of 47 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

def get_from_buffer(fields, prefix='', indent_level=2, remark=False):
    """
    Emit code that collects values from buf:offset, updating offset as progressing.
    :param remark: BE FUCKING VERBOSE! #DEBUG
    """
Severity: Minor
Found in coolamqp/framing/compilation/textcode_fields.py - About 7 hrs to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Function get_serializer has a Cognitive Complexity of 46 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

def get_serializer(fields, prefix='', indent_level=2):  # type: (list, str) -> str, dict
    """
    Emit code that serializes the fields into buf at offset

    :param fields: list of Field instances
Severity: Minor
Found in coolamqp/framing/compilation/textcode_fields.py - About 7 hrs to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Cyclomatic complexity is too high in function get_from_buffer. (16)
Open

def get_from_buffer(fields, prefix='', indent_level=2, remark=False):
    """
    Emit code that collects values from buf:offset, updating offset as progressing.
    :param remark: BE FUCKING VERBOSE! #DEBUG
    """
Severity: Minor
Found in coolamqp/framing/compilation/textcode_fields.py by radon

Cyclomatic Complexity

Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

Cyclomatic complexity is too high in function get_serializer. (15)
Open

def get_serializer(fields, prefix='', indent_level=2):  # type: (list, str) -> str, dict
    """
    Emit code that serializes the fields into buf at offset

    :param fields: list of Field instances
Severity: Minor
Found in coolamqp/framing/compilation/textcode_fields.py by radon

Cyclomatic Complexity

Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

Cyclomatic complexity is too high in function get_counter. (11)
Open

def get_counter(fields, prefix=u'', indent_level=2):
    """
    Emit code that counts how long this struct is.

    :param fields: list of Field instances
Severity: Minor
Found in coolamqp/framing/compilation/textcode_fields.py by radon

Cyclomatic Complexity

Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

Function get_counter has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

def get_counter(fields, prefix=u'', indent_level=2):
    """
    Emit code that counts how long this struct is.

    :param fields: list of Field instances
Severity: Minor
Found in coolamqp/framing/compilation/textcode_fields.py - About 1 hr to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Line too long (90 > 80 characters)
Open

    * local variables denoted with a list of Field (namedtuple) with optional prefix exist
Severity: Minor
Found in coolamqp/framing/compilation/textcode_fields.py by pep8

Limit all lines to a maximum of 79 characters.

There are still many devices around that are limited to 80 character
lines; plus, limiting windows to 80 characters makes it possible to
have several windows side-by-side.  The default wrapping on such
devices looks ugly.  Therefore, please limit all lines to a maximum
of 79 characters. For flowing long blocks of text (docstrings or
comments), limiting the length to 72 characters is recommended.

Reports error E501.

Line too long (97 > 80 characters)
Open

        * from coolamqp.framing.field_table import enframe_table, deframe_table, frame_table_size
Severity: Minor
Found in coolamqp/framing/compilation/textcode_fields.py by pep8

Limit all lines to a maximum of 79 characters.

There are still many devices around that are limited to 80 character
lines; plus, limiting windows to 80 characters makes it possible to
have several windows side-by-side.  The default wrapping on such
devices looks ugly.  Therefore, please limit all lines to a maximum
of 79 characters. For flowing long blocks of text (docstrings or
comments), limiting the length to 72 characters is recommended.

Reports error E501.

Line too long (83 > 80 characters)
Open

    Emit code that collects values from buf:offset, updating offset as progressing.
Severity: Minor
Found in coolamqp/framing/compilation/textcode_fields.py by pep8

Limit all lines to a maximum of 79 characters.

There are still many devices around that are limited to 80 character
lines; plus, limiting windows to 80 characters makes it possible to
have several windows side-by-side.  The default wrapping on such
devices looks ugly.  Therefore, please limit all lines to a maximum
of 79 characters. For flowing long blocks of text (docstrings or
comments), limiting the length to 72 characters is recommended.

Reports error E501.

Line too long (90 > 80 characters)
Open

            accumulator += 0  # because frame_table_size accounts for that 4 leading bytes
Severity: Minor
Found in coolamqp/framing/compilation/textcode_fields.py by pep8

Limit all lines to a maximum of 79 characters.

There are still many devices around that are limited to 80 character
lines; plus, limiting windows to 80 characters makes it possible to
have several windows side-by-side.  The default wrapping on such
devices looks ugly.  Therefore, please limit all lines to a maximum
of 79 characters. For flowing long blocks of text (docstrings or
comments), limiting the length to 72 characters is recommended.

Reports error E501.

Line too long (88 > 80 characters)
Open

def get_serializer(fields, prefix='', indent_level=2):  # type: (list, str) -> str, dict
Severity: Minor
Found in coolamqp/framing/compilation/textcode_fields.py by pep8

Limit all lines to a maximum of 79 characters.

There are still many devices around that are limited to 80 character
lines; plus, limiting windows to 80 characters makes it possible to
have several windows side-by-side.  The default wrapping on such
devices looks ugly.  Therefore, please limit all lines to a maximum
of 79 characters. For flowing long blocks of text (docstrings or
comments), limiting the length to 72 characters is recommended.

Reports error E501.

There are no issues that match your filters.

Category
Status