Showing 46 of 46 total issues
Cyclomatic complexity is too high in method __init__. (14) Open
def __init__(self, extension_name: str, files: tp.Iterator[str],
dont_snakehouse: bool = False,
**kwargs):
# sanitize path separators so that Linux-style paths are supported on Windows
logger.warning('Building extension %s with files %s', extension_name, files)
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Cyclomatic Complexity
Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.
Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:
Construct | Effect on CC | Reasoning |
---|---|---|
if | +1 | An if statement is a single decision. |
elif | +1 | The elif statement adds another decision. |
else | +0 | The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if. |
for | +1 | There is a decision at the start of the loop. |
while | +1 | There is a decision at the while statement. |
except | +1 | Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution. |
finally | +0 | The finally block is unconditionally executed. |
with | +1 | The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details). |
assert | +1 | The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement. |
Comprehension | +1 | A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop. |
Boolean Operator | +1 | Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point. |
Cyclomatic complexity is too high in method generate_header_files. (12) Open
def generate_header_files(self):
for filename in self.pyx_files:
path, name, cmod_name_path, module_name, coded_module_name, complete_module_name = self.transform_module_name(filename)
if not name.endswith('.pyx'):
continue
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Cyclomatic Complexity
Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.
Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:
Construct | Effect on CC | Reasoning |
---|---|---|
if | +1 | An if statement is a single decision. |
elif | +1 | The elif statement adds another decision. |
else | +0 | The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if. |
for | +1 | There is a decision at the start of the loop. |
while | +1 | There is a decision at the while statement. |
except | +1 | Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution. |
finally | +0 | The finally block is unconditionally executed. |
with | +1 | The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details). |
assert | +1 | The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement. |
Comprehension | +1 | A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop. |
Boolean Operator | +1 | Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point. |
Cyclomatic complexity is too high in function read_requirements_txt. (10) Open
def read_requirements_txt(path: str = 'requirements.txt'):
"""
Read requirements.txt and parse it into a list of packages
as given by setup(install_required=).
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Cyclomatic Complexity
Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.
Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:
Construct | Effect on CC | Reasoning |
---|---|---|
if | +1 | An if statement is a single decision. |
elif | +1 | The elif statement adds another decision. |
else | +0 | The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if. |
for | +1 | There is a decision at the start of the loop. |
while | +1 | There is a decision at the while statement. |
except | +1 | Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution. |
finally | +0 | The finally block is unconditionally executed. |
with | +1 | The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details). |
assert | +1 | The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement. |
Comprehension | +1 | A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop. |
Boolean Operator | +1 | Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point. |
Function generate_header_files
has a Cognitive Complexity of 16 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def generate_header_files(self):
for filename in self.pyx_files:
path, name, cmod_name_path, module_name, coded_module_name, complete_module_name = self.transform_module_name(filename)
if not name.endswith('.pyx'):
continue
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Cyclomatic complexity is too high in class Multibuild. (6) Open
class Multibuild:
"""
This specifies a single Cython extension, called {extension_name}.__bootstrap__
All kwargs will be sent straight to Cython's Extension
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Cyclomatic Complexity
Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.
Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:
Construct | Effect on CC | Reasoning |
---|---|---|
if | +1 | An if statement is a single decision. |
elif | +1 | The elif statement adds another decision. |
else | +0 | The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if. |
for | +1 | There is a decision at the start of the loop. |
while | +1 | There is a decision at the while statement. |
except | +1 | Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution. |
finally | +0 | The finally block is unconditionally executed. |
with | +1 | The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details). |
assert | +1 | The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement. |
Comprehension | +1 | A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop. |
Boolean Operator | +1 | Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point. |
Cyclomatic complexity is too high in method transform_module_name. (6) Open
def transform_module_name(self, filename):
path, name = os.path.split(filename)
module_name = name.replace('.pyx', '')
if path.startswith(self.bootstrap_directory):
cmod_name_path = path[len(self.bootstrap_directory):]
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Cyclomatic Complexity
Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.
Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:
Construct | Effect on CC | Reasoning |
---|---|---|
if | +1 | An if statement is a single decision. |
elif | +1 | The elif statement adds another decision. |
else | +0 | The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if. |
for | +1 | There is a decision at the start of the loop. |
while | +1 | There is a decision at the while statement. |
except | +1 | Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution. |
finally | +0 | The finally block is unconditionally executed. |
with | +1 | The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details). |
assert | +1 | The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement. |
Comprehension | +1 | A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop. |
Boolean Operator | +1 | Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point. |
Cyclomatic complexity is too high in function build. (6) Open
def build(extensions: tp.List[MultiBuildType], *args, nthreads=None, **kwargs):
if nthreads is None:
nthreads = multiprocessing.cpu_count()
kwargs['nthreads'] = nthreads
returns = []
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Cyclomatic Complexity
Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.
Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:
Construct | Effect on CC | Reasoning |
---|---|---|
if | +1 | An if statement is a single decision. |
elif | +1 | The elif statement adds another decision. |
else | +0 | The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if. |
for | +1 | There is a decision at the start of the loop. |
while | +1 | There is a decision at the while statement. |
except | +1 | Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution. |
finally | +0 | The finally block is unconditionally executed. |
with | +1 | The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details). |
assert | +1 | The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement. |
Comprehension | +1 | A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop. |
Boolean Operator | +1 | Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point. |
Function parallelCCompile
has 9 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def parallelCCompile(self, sources, output_dir=None, macros=None, include_dirs=None, debug=0,
Function __init__
has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def __init__(self, extension_name: str, files: tp.Iterator[str],
dont_snakehouse: bool = False,
**kwargs):
# sanitize path separators so that Linux-style paths are supported on Windows
logger.warning('Building extension %s with files %s', extension_name, files)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function cull_path
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def cull_path(path):
if not path:
return path
if path[0] == os.path.sep:
if len(path) > 1:
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function build
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def build(extensions: tp.List[MultiBuildType], *args, nthreads=None, **kwargs):
if nthreads is None:
nthreads = multiprocessing.cpu_count()
kwargs['nthreads'] = nthreads
returns = []
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function transform_module_name
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def transform_module_name(self, filename):
path, name = os.path.split(filename)
module_name = name.replace('.pyx', '')
if path.startswith(self.bootstrap_directory):
cmod_name_path = path[len(self.bootstrap_directory):]
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function monkey_patch_parallel_compilation
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def monkey_patch_parallel_compilation(cores: tp.Optional[int] = None) -> None:
"""
This monkey-patches distutils to provide parallel compilation, even if you have
a single extension built from multiple .c files.
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Line too long (104 > 100 characters) Open
h_path_name = os.path.join(cmod_name_path, name.replace('.pyx', '.h')).replace('\\', '\\\\')
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Limit all lines to a maximum of 79 characters.
There are still many devices around that are limited to 80 character
lines; plus, limiting windows to 80 characters makes it possible to
have several windows side-by-side. The default wrapping on such
devices looks ugly. Therefore, please limit all lines to a maximum
of 79 characters. For flowing long blocks of text (docstrings or
comments), limiting the length to 72 characters is recommended.
Reports error E501.
Multiple top level headers in the same document Open
# v1.2.2
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
MD025 - Multiple top level headers in the same document
Tags: headers
Aliases: single-h1
Parameters: level (number; default 1)
This rule is triggered when a top level header is in use (the first line of the file is a h1 header), and more than one h1 header is in use in the document:
# Top level header
# Another top level header
To fix, structure your document so that there is a single h1 header that is the title for the document, and all later headers are h2 or lower level headers:
# Title
## Header
## Another header
Rationale: A top level header is a h1 on the first line of the file, and serves as the title for the document. If this convention is in use, then there can not be more than one title for the document, and the entire document should be contained within this header.
Note: The level
parameter can be used to change the top level (ex: to h2) in
cases where an h1 is added externally.
Line too long (111 > 100 characters) Open
return pkg_resources.resource_string('snakehouse', os.path.join('templates', template_name)).decode('utf8')
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Limit all lines to a maximum of 79 characters.
There are still many devices around that are limited to 80 character
lines; plus, limiting windows to 80 characters makes it possible to
have several windows side-by-side. The default wrapping on such
devices looks ugly. Therefore, please limit all lines to a maximum
of 79 characters. For flowing long blocks of text (docstrings or
comments), limiting the length to 72 characters is recommended.
Reports error E501.
Trailing spaces Open
* snakehouse won't complain anymore if installing
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
MD009 - Trailing spaces
Tags: whitespace
Aliases: no-trailing-spaces
Parameters: br_spaces (number; default: 0)
This rule is triggered on any lines that end with whitespace. To fix this, find the line that is triggered and remove any trailing spaces from the end.
The brspaces parameter allows an exception to this rule for a specific amount of trailing spaces used to insert an explicit line break/br element. For example, set brspaces to 2 to allow exactly 2 spaces at the end of a line.
Note: you have to set brspaces to 2 or higher for this exception to take effect - you can't insert a br element with just a single trailing space, so if you set brspaces to 1, the exception will be disabled, just as if it was set to the default of 0.
Multiple top level headers in the same document Open
# v1.2.3
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
MD025 - Multiple top level headers in the same document
Tags: headers
Aliases: single-h1
Parameters: level (number; default 1)
This rule is triggered when a top level header is in use (the first line of the file is a h1 header), and more than one h1 header is in use in the document:
# Top level header
# Another top level header
To fix, structure your document so that there is a single h1 header that is the title for the document, and all later headers are h2 or lower level headers:
# Title
## Header
## Another header
Rationale: A top level header is a h1 on the first line of the file, and serves as the title for the document. If this convention is in use, then there can not be more than one title for the document, and the entire document should be contained within this header.
Note: The level
parameter can be used to change the top level (ex: to h2) in
cases where an h1 is added externally.
Multiple top level headers in the same document Open
# v1.2.1
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
MD025 - Multiple top level headers in the same document
Tags: headers
Aliases: single-h1
Parameters: level (number; default 1)
This rule is triggered when a top level header is in use (the first line of the file is a h1 header), and more than one h1 header is in use in the document:
# Top level header
# Another top level header
To fix, structure your document so that there is a single h1 header that is the title for the document, and all later headers are h2 or lower level headers:
# Title
## Header
## Another header
Rationale: A top level header is a h1 on the first line of the file, and serves as the title for the document. If this convention is in use, then there can not be more than one title for the document, and the entire document should be contained within this header.
Note: The level
parameter can be used to change the top level (ex: to h2) in
cases where an h1 is added externally.
Line too long (131 > 100 characters) Open
path, name, cmod_name_path, module_name, coded_module_name, complete_module_name = self.transform_module_name(filename)
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Limit all lines to a maximum of 79 characters.
There are still many devices around that are limited to 80 character
lines; plus, limiting windows to 80 characters makes it possible to
have several windows side-by-side. The default wrapping on such
devices looks ugly. Therefore, please limit all lines to a maximum
of 79 characters. For flowing long blocks of text (docstrings or
comments), limiting the length to 72 characters is recommended.
Reports error E501.