Showing 17 of 17 total issues
Method process_files
has a Cognitive Complexity of 108 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.process_files(operation, s3, from_files_or_dir_or_loc, ignore=[], match_regex_or_glob='.+', to_loc_or_dir=nil, alter_filename_lambda=nil, flatten=false)
# Validate that the file operation makes sense
case operation
when :copy, :move, :download, :upload
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method process_files
has 151 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.process_files(operation, s3, from_files_or_dir_or_loc, ignore=[], match_regex_or_glob='.+', to_loc_or_dir=nil, alter_filename_lambda=nil, flatten=false)
# Validate that the file operation makes sense
case operation
when :copy, :move, :download, :upload
File s3.rb
has 339 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
require 'tmpdir'
require 'fog'
require 'thread'
require 'timeout'
Method process_files
has 8 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.process_files(operation, s3, from_files_or_dir_or_loc, ignore=[], match_regex_or_glob='.+', to_loc_or_dir=nil, alter_filename_lambda=nil, flatten=false)
Method name_file
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.name_file(filepath, new_filename, remove_path=nil, add_path=nil, flatten=false)
# First, replace the filename in filepath with new one
dirname = File.dirname(filepath)
new_filepath = (dirname == '.') ? new_filename : dirname + '/' + new_filename
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method copy_files_inter
has 7 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.copy_files_inter(from_s3, to_s3, from_location, to_location, match_regex='.+', alter_filename_lambda=nil, flatten=false)
Method copy_files_manifest
has 7 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.copy_files_manifest(s3, manifest, from_files_or_loc, to_location, match_regex='.+', alter_filename_lambda=nil, flatten=false)
Method move_files_inter
has 7 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.move_files_inter(from_s3, to_s3, from_location, to_location, match_regex='.+', alter_filename_lambda=nil, flatten=false)
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if files_to_process.size == 0
complete = true
next
else
marker_opts['marker'] = files_to_process.last.key
Method copy_files
has 6 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.copy_files(s3, from_files_or_loc, to_location, match_regex='.+', alter_filename_lambda=nil, flatten=false)
Method move_files
has 6 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.move_files(s3, from_files_or_loc, to_location, match_regex='.+', alter_filename_lambda=nil, flatten=false)
Method name_file
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.name_file(filepath, new_filename, remove_path=nil, add_path=nil, flatten=false)
Method retry_x
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.retry_x(object, send_args, retries, attempt_msg, failure_msg)
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
when :copy
source = "#{from_bucket}/#{filepath}"
target = name_file(filepath, filename, from_path, to_loc_or_dir.dir_as_path, flatten)
puts "(t#{thread_idx}) COPY #{source} +-> #{to_loc_or_dir.bucket}/#{target}"
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 32.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
when :move
source = "#{from_bucket}/#{filepath}"
target = name_file(filepath, filename, from_path, to_loc_or_dir.dir_as_path, flatten)
puts "(t#{thread_idx}) MOVE #{source} -> #{to_loc_or_dir.bucket}/#{target}"
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 32.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
def self.move_files(s3, from_files_or_loc, to_location, match_regex='.+', alter_filename_lambda=nil, flatten=false)
puts " moving #{describe_from(from_files_or_loc)} to #{to_location}"
process_files(:move, s3, from_files_or_loc, [], match_regex, to_location, alter_filename_lambda, flatten)
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 26.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
def self.copy_files(s3, from_files_or_loc, to_location, match_regex='.+', alter_filename_lambda=nil, flatten=false)
puts " copying #{describe_from(from_files_or_loc)} to #{to_location}"
process_files(:copy, s3, from_files_or_loc, [], match_regex, to_location, alter_filename_lambda, flatten)
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 26.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76