Showing 270 of 270 total issues
Function exports
has 97 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
module.exports = function(root) {
return {
/* Return API */
get middleware() {
if (!app) {
Function createSimpleLexer
has 94 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function createSimpleLexer(shortcutStylePatterns, fallthroughStylePatterns) {
var shortcuts = {};
var tokenizer;
(function () {
var allPatterns = shortcutStylePatterns.concat(fallthroughStylePatterns);
Function numberLines
has 90 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function numberLines(node, opt_startLineNum, isPreformatted) {
var nocode = /(?:^|\s)nocode(?:\s|$)/;
var lineBreak = /\r\n?|\n/;
var document = node.ownerDocument;
Function prettyPrint
has 85 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function prettyPrint(opt_whenDone) {
function byTagName(tn) { return document.getElementsByTagName(tn); }
// fetch a list of nodes to rewrite
var codeSegments = [byTagName('pre'), byTagName('code'), byTagName('xmp')];
var elements = [];
Function popoverElement
has 84 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
var popoverElement = function() {
var object = {
init : function() {
this.element = angular.element(
'<div class="popover popover-incode top">' +
Function exports
has a Cognitive Complexity of 23 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
module.exports = function(ss, router, options) {
return {
plan: function(args) {
var plan = {}, httpServer = args[0];
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function probe
has 81 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Socket.prototype.probe = function (name) {
debug('probing transport "%s"', name);
var transport = this.createTransport(name, { probe: 1 });
var failed = false;
var self = this;
Function recombineTagsAndDecorations
has 81 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function recombineTagsAndDecorations(job) {
var isIE8OrEarlier = /\bMSIE\s(\d+)/.exec(navigator.userAgent);
isIE8OrEarlier = isIE8OrEarlier && +isIE8OrEarlier[1] <= 8;
var newlineRe = /\n/g;
Function sourceDecorator
has 80 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function sourceDecorator(options) {
var shortcutStylePatterns = [], fallthroughStylePatterns = [];
if (options['tripleQuotedStrings']) {
// '''multi-line-string''', 'single-line-string', and double-quoted
shortcutStylePatterns.push(
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
var thisUrl = url.parse(request.url, true),
clientName = thisUrl.pathname.split('/')[2],
clientId = thisUrl.pathname.split('/')[3],
bundler = ss.bundler.get({ name:clientName }),
params = thisUrl.query, //qs.parse(thisUrl.query),
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 99.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
var thisUrl = url.parse(request.url, true),
clientName = thisUrl.pathname.split('/')[2],
clientId = thisUrl.pathname.split('/')[3],
bundler = ss.bundler.get({ name:clientName }),
params = thisUrl.query, //qs.parse(thisUrl.query),
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 99.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Function tabbable
has 79 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
directive.tabbable = function() {
return {
restrict: 'C',
compile: function(element) {
var navTabs = angular.element('<ul class="nav nav-tabs"></ul>'),
Function create
has 79 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Request.prototype.create = function () {
var opts = { agent: this.agent, xdomain: this.xd, xscheme: this.xs, enablesXDR: this.enablesXDR };
// SSL options for Node.js client
opts.pfx = this.pfx;
Function exports
has 76 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
module.exports = function(responderId, config, ss) {
var code, name;
name = config && config.name || 'rpc';
// Serve client code
Function exports
has 74 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
module.exports = function(ss, router, options) {
return {
plan: function(args) {
var plan = {}, httpServer = args[0];
Function exports
has a Cognitive Complexity of 21 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
module.exports = function() {
return {
transport: require('./transport')(),
/**
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function exports
has a Cognitive Complexity of 21 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
module.exports = function(ss, options) {
//set default timings
if (!options.onChange) {options.onChange = {};} // dubious side effect here
if (!options.onChange.delayTime) {options.onChange.delayTime = 100;}
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function Socket
has 70 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function Socket(uri, opts) {
if (!(this instanceof Socket)) return new Socket(uri, opts);
opts = opts || {};
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
item = {
type: 'table',
header: cap[1].replace(/^ *| *\| *$/g, '').split(/ *\| */),
align: cap[2].replace(/^ *|\| *$/g, '').split(/ *\| */),
cells: cap[3].replace(/(?: *\| *)?\n$/, '').split('\n')
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 91.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
item = {
type: 'table',
header: cap[1].replace(/^ *| *\| *$/g, '').split(/ *\| */),
align: cap[2].replace(/^ *|\| *$/g, '').split(/ *\| */),
cells: cap[3].replace(/\n$/, '').split('\n')
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 91.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76