Showing 47 of 47 total issues
Method agent_deployed?
has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def agent_deployed?(hostname)
hist = History.find_by(host: hostname, node_type: "agent")
if enabled?
return false if hist.nil? or hist.deployed_at.nil?
hist.deployed_at >= self.agent_updated_at if self.agent_updated_at
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method configure
has 31 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def configure(conf)
super
if @remove_prefix
@removed_prefix_string = @remove_prefix + '.'
Method configure
has 31 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def configure(conf)
super
@channel = '#' + @channel
@join_uri = URI.parse "http://#{@host}:#{@port}/join"
Function Datepicker
has 30 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
var Datepicker = function(element, options){
this.element = $(element);
this.format = DPGlobal.parseFormat(options.format||this.element.data('date-format')||'mm/dd/yyyy');
this.picker = $(DPGlobal.template)
.appendTo('body')
Method configure
has 28 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def configure(conf)
super
@out_keys = @out_keys.split(',')
@message_out_keys = @message_out_keys.split(',')
Method emit
has 28 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def emit(tag, es, chain)
min = nil
max = nil
sum = 0
num = 0
Method configure
has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def configure(conf)
super
@channel = '#' + @channel
@join_uri = URI.parse "http://#{@host}:#{@port}/join"
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method call
has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def call(env)
began_at = Time.now
begin
status, header, body = @app.call(env)
rescue => e
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
def worker_deployed?(hostname)
hist = History.find_by(host: hostname, node_type: "worker")
if enabled?
return false if hist.nil? or hist.deployed_at.nil?
hist.deployed_at >= self.updated_at if self.updated_at
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 48.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
def agent_deployed?(hostname)
hist = History.find_by(host: hostname, node_type: "agent")
if enabled?
return false if hist.nil? or hist.deployed_at.nil?
hist.deployed_at >= self.agent_updated_at if self.agent_updated_at
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 48.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Method configure
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def configure(conf)
super
@out_keys = @out_keys.split(',')
@message_out_keys = @message_out_keys.split(',')
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method emit
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def emit(tag, es, chain)
if @remove_prefix and
( (tag.start_with?(@removed_prefix_string) and tag.length > @removed_length) or tag == @remove_prefix)
tag = tag[@removed_length..-1]
end
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method count_initialized
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def count_initialized(keys=nil)
# counts['tag'] = {:min => num, :max => num, :sum => num, :num => num [, :sample => [....]]}
if @aggregate == :all
if @percentiles
{'all' => {:min => nil, :max => nil, :sum => nil, :num => 0, :sample => []}}
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method countups
has 6 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def countups(tag, min, max, sum, num, sample)
Method configure
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def configure(conf)
super
if @unit
@count_interval = case @unit
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method configure
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def configure(conf)
super
if @remove_prefix
@removed_prefix_string = @remove_prefix + '.'
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method evaluate_message
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def evaluate_message(message, out_keys, tag, time, record)
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
post '/:irc_id/duplicate' do |irc_id|
redirect '/' unless irc = Irc.find(irc_id)
@irc = irc.duplicate(params['irc'])
if @irc.error?
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 36.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
post '/:email_id/duplicate' do |email_id|
redirect '/' unless email = Email.find(email_id)
@email = email.duplicate(params['email'])
if @email.error?
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 36.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Method remote_file
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def remote_file(target_path, source_path = nil)
contents = nil
if block_given?
contents = yield
source_path = create_tempfile(contents)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"