Method circumventBug2650internal
has a Cognitive Complexity of 40 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
@SuppressWarnings("fallthrough")
private static void
circumventBug2650internal(Node node)
{
Node parent = null;
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method protectAgainstWrappingAttack
has a Cognitive Complexity of 31 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public static boolean
protectAgainstWrappingAttack(Node startNode, String value)
{
Node startParent = startNode.getParentNode();
Node processedNode;
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
File XMLUtils.java
has 327 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
/**
* Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
* or more contributor license agreements. See the NOTICE file
* distributed with this work for additional information
* regarding copyright ownership. The ASF licenses this file
Method protectAgainstWrappingAttack
has a Cognitive Complexity of 24 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public static boolean
protectAgainstWrappingAttack(
Node startNode, Element knownElement, String value
)
{
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method circumventBug2650internal
has 50 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
@SuppressWarnings("fallthrough")
private static void
circumventBug2650internal(Node node)
{
Node parent = null;
Method protectAgainstWrappingAttack
has 38 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public static boolean
protectAgainstWrappingAttack(Node startNode, String value)
{
Node startParent = startNode.getParentNode();
Node processedNode;
Method protectAgainstWrappingAttack
has 33 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public static boolean
protectAgainstWrappingAttack(
Node startNode, Element knownElement, String value
)
{
Method getOwnerDocument
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public static Document
getOwnerDocument(Set<Node> xpathNodeSet)
{
NullPointerException npe = null;
for (Node node : xpathNodeSet) {
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method isDescendantOrSelf
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public static boolean
isDescendantOrSelf(Node ctx, Node descendantOrSelf)
{
if (ctx == descendantOrSelf) {
return true;
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if (attr.isId() && id.equals(attr.getValue()) && se != knownElement) {
//log.debug("Multiple elements with the same 'Id' attribute value!");
return false;
}
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if (!namespaceNs.equals(currentAttr.getNamespaceURI())) {
continue;
}
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if (attr.isId() && id.equals(attr.getValue())) {
if (foundElement == null) {
// Continue searching to find duplicates
foundElement = attr.getOwnerElement();
} else {
Method getStrFromNode
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public static String
getStrFromNode(Node xpathnode)
{
if (xpathnode.getNodeType() == Node.TEXT_NODE) {
// we iterate over all siblings of the context node because eventually,
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if (childElement.hasAttributeNS(namespaceNs,
currentAttr.getLocalName())) {
continue;
}
Method selectNode
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public static Element
selectNode(Node sibling, String uri, String nodeName, int number)
{
while (sibling != null) {
if (sibling.getNamespaceURI() != null && sibling.getNamespaceURI().equals(uri)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
while (startNode == null) {
processedNode = processedNode.getParentNode();
if (processedNode == startParent) {
return true;
}
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 44.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
while (startNode == null) {
processedNode = processedNode.getParentNode();
if (processedNode == startParent) {
return true;
}
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 44.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if (parent.getNodeType() == Node.ATTRIBUTE_NODE) {
parent = ((Attr) parent).getOwnerElement();
} else {
parent = parent.getParentNode();
}
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 40.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76