File extconf.rb
has 817 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
ENV["RC_ARCHS"] = "" if RUBY_PLATFORM.include?("darwin")
require "mkmf"
require "rbconfig"
require "fileutils"
Method process_recipe
has a Cognitive Complexity of 41 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def process_recipe(name, version, static_p, cross_p, cacheable_p = true)
require "rubygems"
gem("mini_portile2", REQUIRED_MINI_PORTILE_VERSION) # gemspec is not respected at install time
require "mini_portile2"
message("Using mini_portile version #{MiniPortile::VERSION}\n")
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method process_recipe
has 92 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def process_recipe(name, version, static_p, cross_p, cacheable_p = true)
require "rubygems"
gem("mini_portile2", REQUIRED_MINI_PORTILE_VERSION) # gemspec is not respected at install time
require "mini_portile2"
message("Using mini_portile version #{MiniPortile::VERSION}\n")
Method iconv_configure_flags
has a Cognitive Complexity of 14 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def iconv_configure_flags
# give --with-iconv-dir and --with-opt-dir first priority
["iconv", "opt"].each do |target|
config = preserving_globals { dir_config(target) }
next unless config.any? && try_link_iconv("--with-#{target}-* flags") { dir_config(target) }
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method iconv_configure_flags
has 28 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def iconv_configure_flags
# give --with-iconv-dir and --with-opt-dir first priority
["iconv", "opt"].each do |target|
config = preserving_globals { dir_config(target) }
next unless config.any? && try_link_iconv("--with-#{target}-* flags") { dir_config(target) }
Method process_recipe
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def process_recipe(name, version, static_p, cross_p, cacheable_p = true)
Method configure
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def configure
Dir.chdir(work_path) do
mk = File.read("win32/Makefile.gcc")
File.open("win32/Makefile.gcc", "wb") do |f|
f.puts "BINARY_PATH = #{path}/bin"
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method try_link_iconv
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def try_link_iconv(using = nil)
checking_for(using ? "iconv using #{using}" : "iconv") do
["", "-liconv"].any? do |opt|
preserving_globals do
yield if block_given?
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method compile
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def compile
cflags = concat_flags(ENV["CFLAGS"], "-fPIC", "-O2", "-g")
env = { "CC" => gcc_cmd, "CFLAGS" => cflags }
if config_cross_build?
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if source_dir
recipe.source_directory = source_dir
else
minor_version = Gem::Version.new(recipe.version).segments.take(2).join(".")
recipe.files = [{
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 54.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if source_dir
recipe.source_directory = source_dir
else
minor_version = Gem::Version.new(recipe.version).segments.take(2).join(".")
recipe.files = [{
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 54.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if libiconv_recipe
append_cppflags("-I#{libiconv_recipe.path}/include")
$LIBPATH = ["#{libiconv_recipe.path}/lib"] | $LIBPATH
ensure_package_configuration(
opt: "iconv",
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 30.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if zlib_recipe
append_cppflags("-I#{zlib_recipe.path}/include")
$LIBPATH = ["#{zlib_recipe.path}/lib"] | $LIBPATH
ensure_package_configuration(
opt: "zlib",
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 30.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76