sparklemotion/nokogiri

View on GitHub
ext/nokogiri/extconf.rb

Summary

Maintainability
F
4 days
Test Coverage

File extconf.rb has 817 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

ENV["RC_ARCHS"] = "" if RUBY_PLATFORM.include?("darwin")

require "mkmf"
require "rbconfig"
require "fileutils"
Severity: Major
Found in ext/nokogiri/extconf.rb - About 1 day to fix

    Method process_recipe has a Cognitive Complexity of 41 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

    def process_recipe(name, version, static_p, cross_p, cacheable_p = true)
      require "rubygems"
      gem("mini_portile2", REQUIRED_MINI_PORTILE_VERSION) # gemspec is not respected at install time
      require "mini_portile2"
      message("Using mini_portile version #{MiniPortile::VERSION}\n")
    Severity: Minor
    Found in ext/nokogiri/extconf.rb - About 6 hrs to fix

    Cognitive Complexity

    Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

    A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

    • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
    • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
    • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

    Further reading

    Method process_recipe has 92 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

    def process_recipe(name, version, static_p, cross_p, cacheable_p = true)
      require "rubygems"
      gem("mini_portile2", REQUIRED_MINI_PORTILE_VERSION) # gemspec is not respected at install time
      require "mini_portile2"
      message("Using mini_portile version #{MiniPortile::VERSION}\n")
    Severity: Major
    Found in ext/nokogiri/extconf.rb - About 3 hrs to fix

      Method iconv_configure_flags has a Cognitive Complexity of 14 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
      Open

      def iconv_configure_flags
        # give --with-iconv-dir and --with-opt-dir first priority
        ["iconv", "opt"].each do |target|
          config = preserving_globals { dir_config(target) }
          next unless config.any? && try_link_iconv("--with-#{target}-* flags") { dir_config(target) }
      Severity: Minor
      Found in ext/nokogiri/extconf.rb - About 1 hr to fix

      Cognitive Complexity

      Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

      A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

      • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
      • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
      • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

      Further reading

      Method iconv_configure_flags has 28 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
      Open

      def iconv_configure_flags
        # give --with-iconv-dir and --with-opt-dir first priority
        ["iconv", "opt"].each do |target|
          config = preserving_globals { dir_config(target) }
          next unless config.any? && try_link_iconv("--with-#{target}-* flags") { dir_config(target) }
      Severity: Minor
      Found in ext/nokogiri/extconf.rb - About 1 hr to fix

        Method process_recipe has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.
        Open

        def process_recipe(name, version, static_p, cross_p, cacheable_p = true)
        Severity: Minor
        Found in ext/nokogiri/extconf.rb - About 35 mins to fix

          Method configure has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
          Open

                    def configure
                      Dir.chdir(work_path) do
                        mk = File.read("win32/Makefile.gcc")
                        File.open("win32/Makefile.gcc", "wb") do |f|
                          f.puts "BINARY_PATH = #{path}/bin"
          Severity: Minor
          Found in ext/nokogiri/extconf.rb - About 35 mins to fix

          Cognitive Complexity

          Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

          A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

          • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
          • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
          • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

          Further reading

          Method try_link_iconv has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
          Open

          def try_link_iconv(using = nil)
            checking_for(using ? "iconv using #{using}" : "iconv") do
              ["", "-liconv"].any? do |opt|
                preserving_globals do
                  yield if block_given?
          Severity: Minor
          Found in ext/nokogiri/extconf.rb - About 35 mins to fix

          Cognitive Complexity

          Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

          A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

          • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
          • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
          • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

          Further reading

          Method compile has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
          Open

              def compile
                cflags = concat_flags(ENV["CFLAGS"], "-fPIC", "-O2", "-g")
          
                env = { "CC" => gcc_cmd, "CFLAGS" => cflags }
                if config_cross_build?
          Severity: Minor
          Found in ext/nokogiri/extconf.rb - About 25 mins to fix

          Cognitive Complexity

          Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

          A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

          • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
          • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
          • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

          Further reading

          Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
          Open

              if source_dir
                recipe.source_directory = source_dir
              else
                minor_version = Gem::Version.new(recipe.version).segments.take(2).join(".")
                recipe.files = [{
          Severity: Major
          Found in ext/nokogiri/extconf.rb and 1 other location - About 1 hr to fix
          ext/nokogiri/extconf.rb on lines 929..937

          Duplicated Code

          Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

          Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

          When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

          Tuning

          This issue has a mass of 54.

          We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

          The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

          If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

          See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

          Refactorings

          Further Reading

          Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
          Open

              if source_dir
                recipe.source_directory = source_dir
              else
                minor_version = Gem::Version.new(recipe.version).segments.take(2).join(".")
                recipe.files = [{
          Severity: Major
          Found in ext/nokogiri/extconf.rb and 1 other location - About 1 hr to fix
          ext/nokogiri/extconf.rb on lines 873..881

          Duplicated Code

          Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

          Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

          When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

          Tuning

          This issue has a mass of 54.

          We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

          The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

          If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

          See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

          Refactorings

          Further Reading

          Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
          Open

            if libiconv_recipe
              append_cppflags("-I#{libiconv_recipe.path}/include")
              $LIBPATH = ["#{libiconv_recipe.path}/lib"] | $LIBPATH
              ensure_package_configuration(
                opt: "iconv",
          Severity: Minor
          Found in ext/nokogiri/extconf.rb and 1 other location - About 25 mins to fix
          ext/nokogiri/extconf.rb on lines 847..856

          Duplicated Code

          Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

          Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

          When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

          Tuning

          This issue has a mass of 30.

          We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

          The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

          If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

          See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

          Refactorings

          Further Reading

          Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
          Open

            if zlib_recipe
              append_cppflags("-I#{zlib_recipe.path}/include")
              $LIBPATH = ["#{zlib_recipe.path}/lib"] | $LIBPATH
              ensure_package_configuration(
                opt: "zlib",
          Severity: Minor
          Found in ext/nokogiri/extconf.rb and 1 other location - About 25 mins to fix
          ext/nokogiri/extconf.rb on lines 859..868

          Duplicated Code

          Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

          Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

          When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

          Tuning

          This issue has a mass of 30.

          We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

          The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

          If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

          See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

          Refactorings

          Further Reading

          There are no issues that match your filters.

          Category
          Status