Showing 539 of 539 total issues
Method native_write
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
@JRubyMethod
public IRubyObject
native_write(ThreadContext context, IRubyObject chunk,
IRubyObject isLast)
{
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method getStrFromNode
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public static String
getStrFromNode(Node xpathnode)
{
if (xpathnode.getNodeType() == Node.TEXT_NODE) {
// we iterate over all siblings of the context node because eventually,
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if (childElement.hasAttributeNS(namespaceNs,
currentAttr.getLocalName())) {
continue;
}
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if (prefix != null && !(prefix.equals(XML) || prefix.equals(XMLNS))) {
visiblyUtilized.add(prefix);
}
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if (!namespaceNs.equals(currentAttr.getNamespaceURI())) {
continue;
}
Method findNamespaceHref
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private String
findNamespaceHref(ThreadContext context, String prefix)
{
XmlNode currentNode = this;
final XmlDocument doc = document(context.runtime);
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method getAttrsOfAncestors
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private void
getAttrsOfAncestors(Node parent, List<Attr> namespaces, List<Attr> attributes)
{
if (parent == null) { return; }
NamedNodeMap attrs = parent.getAttributes();
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if (NName.equals("id")) {
if (isRealVisible) {
// treat xml:id like any other attribute
// (emit it, but don't inherit it)
result.add(attribute);
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if (specifiedPrefix == null &&
attr.getNodeName().equals("xmlns")) {
// default namespace
return value;
} else if (attrPrefix != null &&
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
for (int k = 0; k < nodeMap.getLength(); k++) {
if ("charset".equalsIgnoreCase((item = nodeMap.item(k)).getNodeName())) {
return item.getNodeValue();
}
}
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if (!m_processedFirstElement
&& "xmlns:xml".equals(attrs.item(i).getNodeName())) {
m_processedFirstElement = true;
}
Method getNodeValue
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public String
getNodeValue(int nodeHandle)
{
// The _type(nodeHandle) call was taking the lion's share of our
// time, and was wrong anyway since it wasn't converting handle to
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method call
has 6 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
call(String methodName,
IRubyObject arg0,
IRubyObject arg1,
IRubyObject arg2,
IRubyObject arg3,
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if (node == elem) {
elemHandle = getHandleFromNode(elem);
break;
}
Method configure
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def configure
Dir.chdir(work_path) do
mk = File.read("win32/Makefile.gcc")
File.open("win32/Makefile.gcc", "wb") do |f|
f.puts "BINARY_PATH = #{path}/bin"
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if darwin?
# needed as of zlib 1.2.13
Dir.chdir(work_path) do
makefile = File.read("Makefile").gsub(/^AR=.*$/, "AR=#{host}-libtool")
File.open("Makefile", "w") { |m| m.write(makefile) }
Method read_and_encode
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def read_and_encode(string, encoding)
# Read the string with the given encoding.
if string.respond_to?(:read)
string = if encoding.nil?
string.read
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method visit_attribute_condition
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def visit_attribute_condition(node)
attribute = node.value.first.accept(self)
return attribute if node.value.length == 1
value = node.value.last
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
mk.sub!(/^PREFIX\s*=\s*$/, "PREFIX = #{host}-") if cross_build_p
Method stabilizeAttrs
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private static void
stabilizeAttrs(Node node)
{
if (node.hasAttributes()) {
NamedNodeMap nodeMap = node.getAttributes();
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"