Showing 537 of 537 total issues
File DOM2DTMdefaultNamespaceDeclarationNode.java
has 275 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
/*
* Copyright 1999-2004 The Apache Software Foundation.
*
* Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
* you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
Method getStringInUtf8
has a Cognitive Complexity of 19 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public static byte[]
getStringInUtf8(final String str)
{
final int length = str.length();
boolean expanded = false;
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method joinURI
has 64 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private static String
joinURI(String baseURI, String relativeURI) throws URISyntaxException
{
String bscheme = null;
String bauthority = null;
Method handleAttributes
has 63 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
@Override
protected Iterator<Attr>
handleAttributes(Element element, NameSpaceSymbTable ns)
throws CanonicalizationException
{
Method addNode
has 63 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
protected int
addNode(Node node, int parentIndex,
int previousSibling, int forceNodeType)
{
int nodeIndex = m_nodes.size();
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
} else if (!XML.equals(NName) || !XML_LANG_URI.equals(NValue)) {
/* except omit namespace node with local name xml, which defines
* the xml prefix, if its string value is http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace.
*/
//add the prefix binding to the ns symb table.
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 158.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
} else if (!XML.equals(NName) || !XML_LANG_URI.equals(NValue)) {
/* except omit namespace node with local name xml, which defines
* the xml prefix, if its string value is
* http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace.
*/
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 158.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Method getAttributeNode
has a Cognitive Complexity of 18 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public int
getAttributeNode(int nodeHandle, String namespaceURI,
String name)
{
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method getUnparsedEntityURI
has a Cognitive Complexity of 18 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public String
getUnparsedEntityURI(String name)
{
String url = "";
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method compile
has a Cognitive Complexity of 18 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def compile
cflags = concat_flags(ENV["CFLAGS"], "-fPIC", "-O2", "-g")
env = { "CC" => gcc_cmd, "CFLAGS" => cflags }
if config_cross_build?
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Class Document
has 22 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
class Document < Nokogiri::XML::Node
# See http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-xml-names/#ns-decl for more details. Note that we're not
# attempting to handle unicode characters partly because libxml2 doesn't handle unicode
# characters in NCNAMEs.
NCNAME_START_CHAR = "A-Za-z_"
Method handleAttributes
has 57 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
@Override
protected Iterator<Attr>
handleAttributes(Element element, NameSpaceSymbTable ns)
throws CanonicalizationException
{
Method visit_function
has 57 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def visit_function(node)
msg = :"visit_function_#{node.value.first.gsub(/[(]/, "")}"
return send(msg, node) if respond_to?(msg)
case node.value.first
File XmlSaxParserContext.java
has 261 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
package nokogiri;
import nokogiri.internals.*;
import static nokogiri.internals.NokogiriHelpers.rubyStringToString;
File Canonicalizer20010315.java
has 261 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
/**
* Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
* or more contributor license agreements. See the NOTICE file
* distributed with this work for additional information
* regarding copyright ownership. The ASF licenses this file
Method outputPItoWriter
has a Cognitive Complexity of 17 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
protected void
outputPItoWriter(
ProcessingInstruction currentPI, OutputStream writer, int position
) throws IOException
{
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method getHandleOfNode
has a Cognitive Complexity of 17 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public int
getHandleOfNode(Node node)
{
if (null != node) {
// Is Node actually within the same document? If not, don't search!
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method getElementById
has a Cognitive Complexity of 17 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public int
getElementById(String elementId)
{
Document doc = (m_root.getNodeType() == Node.DOCUMENT_NODE)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method resolveEntity
has a Cognitive Complexity of 17 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
protected InputSource
resolveEntity(Ruby runtime, String name, String publicId, String baseURI, String systemId)
throws IOException, SAXException
{
InputSource s = new InputSource();
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method count
has a Cognitive Complexity of 17 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private boolean
count(Node node, int[] counter)
{
if (node == this.node) {
return true;
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"