Showing 8 of 8 total issues
Method extract_elements_nodes
has a Cognitive Complexity of 31 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def extract_elements_nodes(klass)
nodes = { :attributes => [], :children => [] }
klass.declared_fields.each do |field|
if field.annotation_present?(javax.xml.bind.annotation.XmlValue.java_class) || field.annotation_present?(javax.xml.bind.annotation.XmlMixed.java_class)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method resolve_type
has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def resolve_type(field)
return :ID if field.annotation_present?(javax.xml.bind.annotation.XmlID.java_class)
return :IDREF if field.annotation_present?(javax.xml.bind.annotation.XmlIDREF.java_class)
annot = field.get_annotation(javax.xml.bind.annotation.XmlSchemaType.java_class)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method extract_elements_nodes
has 26 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def extract_elements_nodes(klass)
nodes = { :attributes => [], :children => [] }
klass.declared_fields.each do |field|
if field.annotation_present?(javax.xml.bind.annotation.XmlValue.java_class) || field.annotation_present?(javax.xml.bind.annotation.XmlMixed.java_class)
Method xjc
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def xjc
options = @schema.end_with?(".wsdl") || @options[:wsdl] ? "-wsdl " : ""
bindings = (@options[:bindings] || []).map { |binding| "-b #{binding}"}.join(" ")
options << "-extension -npa -d :sources :schema -b :config #{bindings}"
options << @options[:jvm].map { |opt| " -J#{opt}" }.join(" ") if @options[:jvm]
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method find_namespace
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def find_namespace(klass)
annot = klass.get_annotation(javax.xml.bind.annotation.XmlRootElement.java_class) || klass.get_annotation(javax.xml.bind.annotation.XmlType.java_class)
return unless annot
# if klass is an inner class the namespace will be on the outter class (enclosing_class).
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method initialize
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def initialize(schema, options = {})
raise ArgumentError, "cannot access schema: #{schema}" unless File.file?(schema) and File.readable?(schema)
@xjc = XJC.new(schema, :xjc => options[:xjc], :wsdl => !!options[:wsdl], :jvm => options[:jvm], bindings: options[:bindings])
@namespace = options[:namespace] || {}
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method create_ruby_classes
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def create_ruby_classes
java_classes = find_java_classes(@classes)
raise Error, "no classes were generated from the schema" if java_classes.empty?
$CLASSPATH << @classes unless $CLASSPATH.include?(@classes)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method initialize
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def initialize(name, options = {})
@name = @local_name = name
@accessor = (options[:accessor] || name).underscore
# If this conflicts with a Java keyword it will start with an underscore
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"