Showing 45 of 45 total issues
Function send
has 41 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
send: function (_, completeCallback) {
counter += 1;
var message = {
id: 'postmessage-transport-' + counter
},
Method uploads_one
has 41 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def uploads_one(upload_name, options={})
upload_model_class = "Uploadbox::#{@object.class.base_class.to_s + upload_name.to_s.camelize}".constantize
if upload_model_class.versions.present?
options.reverse_merge!(preview: upload_model_class.versions.keys.first,
Function bridge
has 39 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
$.widget.bridge = function( name, object ) {
var fullName = object.prototype.widgetFullName || name;
$.fn[ name ] = function( options ) {
var isMethodCall = typeof options === "string",
args = slice.call( arguments, 1 ),
Function send
has 39 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
send = function () {
that._sending += 1;
// Set timer for bitrate progress calculation:
options._bitrateTimer = new that._BitrateTimer();
jqXHR = jqXHR || (
Function _on
has 38 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
_on: function( suppressDisabledCheck, element, handlers ) {
var delegateElement,
instance = this;
// no suppressDisabledCheck flag, shuffle arguments
Function v1
has 37 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function v1(options, buf, offset) {
var i = buf && offset || 0;
var b = buf || [];
options = options || {};
Function name
has 36 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
$.fn[ name ] = function( options ) {
var isMethodCall = typeof options === "string",
args = slice.call( arguments, 1 ),
returnValue = this;
Function send
has 36 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
send: function (headers, completeCallback) {
var addParamChar = /\?/.test(s.url) ? '&' : '?';
function callback(status, statusText, responses, responseHeaders) {
xdr.onload = xdr.onerror = xdr.ontimeout = $.noop;
xdr = null;
Function _onProgress
has 35 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
_onProgress: function (e, data) {
if (e.lengthComputable) {
var now = ((Date.now) ? Date.now() : (new Date()).getTime()),
loaded;
if (data._time && data.progressInterval &&
Function _handleFileTreeEntry
has 34 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
_handleFileTreeEntry: function (entry, path) {
var that = this,
dfd = $.Deferred(),
errorHandler = function (e) {
if (e && !e.entry) {
Function option
has 31 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
option: function( key, value ) {
var options = key,
parts,
curOption,
i;
Method after_enqueue_scale_up
has 29 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def after_enqueue_scale_up(*args)
[
{
:workers => 1, # This many workers
:job_count => 1 # For this many jobs or more, until the next level
Function _createWidget
has 28 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
_createWidget: function( options, element ) {
element = $( element || this.defaultElement || this )[ 0 ];
this.element = $( element );
this.uuid = uuid++;
this.eventNamespace = "." + this.widgetName + this.uuid;
Identical blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
(function (factory) {
'use strict';
if (typeof define === 'function' && define.amd) {
// Register as an anonymous AMD module:
define(['jquery'], factory);
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 57.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
(function (factory) {
'use strict';
if (typeof define === 'function' && define.amd) {
// Register as an anonymous AMD module:
define(['jquery'], factory);
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 57.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
(function (factory) {
'use strict';
if (typeof define === 'function' && define.amd) {
// Register as an anonymous AMD module:
define(['jquery'], factory);
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 57.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
@template.render partial: 'uploadbox/images/uploads_one', locals: {
upload_name: upload_name,
resource: @object,
form: self,
version: options[:preview],
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 48.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
@template.render partial: 'uploadbox/images/uploads_many', locals: {
upload_name: upload_name,
resource: @object,
form: self,
version: options[:preview],
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 48.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if (!paramNameSlice.length) {
paramNameSlice = paramName;
}
Method after_enqueue_scale_up
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def after_enqueue_scale_up(*args)
[
{
:workers => 1, # This many workers
:job_count => 1 # For this many jobs or more, until the next level
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"