Showing 17 of 17 total issues
File ledger_importer_job.rb
has 475 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
require 'bigdecimal'
#
# Takes the ledger header and transaction set of the requested sequence from the
# stellar_core database and imports them into the history database.
Method import_history_operations
has 166 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def import_history_operations(sctx, htx)
hops = []
sctx.operations_with_results.each_with_index do |op_and_r, i|
application_order = i + 1
Method import_history_effects_for_operation
has a Cognitive Complexity of 43 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def import_history_effects_for_operation(sctx, scop, scresult, hop)
effects = History::EffectFactory.new(hop)
source_account = scop.source_account || sctx.source_account
op_index = sctx.operations.index(scop)
scopm = sctx.meta.operations![op_index]
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method import_history_operations
has a Cognitive Complexity of 40 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def import_history_operations(sctx, htx)
hops = []
sctx.operations_with_results.each_with_index do |op_and_r, i|
application_order = i + 1
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method import_history_effects_for_operation
has 139 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def import_history_effects_for_operation(sctx, scop, scresult, hop)
effects = History::EffectFactory.new(hop)
source_account = scop.source_account || sctx.source_account
op_index = sctx.operations.index(scop)
scopm = sctx.meta.operations![op_index]
Method perform
has a Cognitive Complexity of 25 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def perform(ledger_sequence, rebuild_allowed=false)
stellar_core_ledger, stellar_core_transactions = load_stellar_core_data(ledger_sequence)
if stellar_core_ledger.blank?
raise ActiveRecord::RecordNotFound,
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Class Transaction
has 21 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
class StellarCore::Transaction < StellarCore::Base
self.table_name = "txhistory"
self.primary_key = "txid"
belongs_to :ledger_header, {
Method perform
has 43 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def perform(ledger_sequence, rebuild_allowed=false)
stellar_core_ledger, stellar_core_transactions = load_stellar_core_data(ledger_sequence)
if stellar_core_ledger.blank?
raise ActiveRecord::RecordNotFound,
Method find_path
has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.find_path(source, destination, amount_needed)
results = []
visited = {}
fn = -> (depth, path, amount_needed) {
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method index
has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def index
tx_scope = History::Transaction
#TODO: clean this whole friggin method up
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method index
has 28 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def index
tx_scope = History::Transaction
#TODO: clean this whole friggin method up
Method process
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def process
if malformed?
@result = :malformed
return
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method from_meta
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def from_meta(meta, fee_meta)
results = []
all_changes = meta.operations!.flat_map(&:changes)
all_changes += fee_meta.changes
all_changes.each do |change|
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method import_history_accounts
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def import_history_accounts(sctx)
haccs = []
sctx.operations.each_with_index do |op, i|
next unless op.body.type == Stellar::OperationType.create_account
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method call
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def call(env)
status, headers, body = @app.call(env)
if should_record(env)
@total.mark
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
when Stellar::AssetType.asset_type_credit_alphanum12
hop.details["asset_type"] = "credit_alphanum12"
hop.details["asset_code"] = asset.asset_code12!.strip
hop.details["asset_issuer"] = Stellar::Convert.pk_to_address source_account
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 25.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
when Stellar::AssetType.asset_type_credit_alphanum4
hop.details["asset_type"] = "credit_alphanum4"
hop.details["asset_code"] = asset.asset_code4!.strip
hop.details["asset_issuer"] = Stellar::Convert.pk_to_address source_account
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 25.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76