Sign upLogin

stellar/xdrgen

View on GitHub
Star
lib/xdrgen/generators/java.rb

Summary

Maintainability
F
1 wk
Test Coverage

File java.rb has 843 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

require 'set'

module Xdrgen
  module Generators
    class Java < Xdrgen::Generators::Base
Severity: Major
Found in lib/xdrgen/generators/java.rb - About 2 days to fix

    Method render_union has a Cognitive Complexity of 62 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

          def render_union(union, out)
        out.puts "public #{name union} () {}"
        out.puts <<-EOS.strip_heredoc
          #{type_string union.discriminant.type} #{union.discriminant.name};
          public #{type_string union.discriminant.type} getDiscriminant() {
    Severity: Minor
    Found in lib/xdrgen/generators/java.rb - About 1 day to fix

    Cognitive Complexity

    Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

    A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

    • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
    • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
    • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

    Further reading

    Method render_union has 196 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

          def render_union(union, out)
        out.puts "public #{name union} () {}"
        out.puts <<-EOS.strip_heredoc
          #{type_string union.discriminant.type} #{union.discriminant.name};
          public #{type_string union.discriminant.type} getDiscriminant() {
    Severity: Major
    Found in lib/xdrgen/generators/java.rb - About 7 hrs to fix

      Method render_struct has 114 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
      Open

            def render_struct(struct, out)
        out.puts "public #{name struct} () {}"
        struct.members.each do |m|
          out.puts <<-EOS.strip_heredoc
            private #{decl_string(m.declaration)} #{m.name};
      Severity: Major
      Found in lib/xdrgen/generators/java.rb - About 4 hrs to fix

        Method add_imports_for_definition has a Cognitive Complexity of 21 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
        Open

              def add_imports_for_definition(defn, imports)
        imports.add("org.stellar.sdk.Base64Factory")
        imports.add("java.io.ByteArrayInputStream")
        imports.add("java.io.ByteArrayOutputStream")
        Severity: Minor
        Found in lib/xdrgen/generators/java.rb - About 2 hrs to fix

        Cognitive Complexity

        Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

        A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

        • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
        • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
        • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

        Further reading

        Class Java has 25 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.
        Open

            class Java < Xdrgen::Generators::Base

      def generate
        constants_container = Set[]
        render_lib
        Severity: Minor
        Found in lib/xdrgen/generators/java.rb - About 2 hrs to fix

          Method render_typedef has 62 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
          Open

                def render_typedef(typedef, out)
        out.puts <<-EOS.strip_heredoc
          private #{decl_string typedef.declaration} #{typedef.name};

          public #{typedef.name.camelize}() {}
          Severity: Major
          Found in lib/xdrgen/generators/java.rb - About 2 hrs to fix

            Method add_imports_for_definition has 44 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
            Open

                  def add_imports_for_definition(defn, imports)
        imports.add("org.stellar.sdk.Base64Factory")
        imports.add("java.io.ByteArrayInputStream")
        imports.add("java.io.ByteArrayOutputStream")
            Severity: Minor
            Found in lib/xdrgen/generators/java.rb - About 1 hr to fix

              Method decode_member has 36 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
              Open

                    def decode_member(value, member, out)
        case member.declaration
        when AST::Declarations::Void ;
          return
        end
              Severity: Minor
              Found in lib/xdrgen/generators/java.rb - About 1 hr to fix

                Method render_enum has 36 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
                Open

                      def render_enum(enum, out)
        out.balance_after /,[\s]*/ do
          enum.members.each do |em|
            out.puts "#{em.name}(#{em.value}),"
          end
                Severity: Minor
                Found in lib/xdrgen/generators/java.rb - About 1 hr to fix

                  Method render_struct has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
                  Open

                        def render_struct(struct, out)
        out.puts "public #{name struct} () {}"
        struct.members.each do |m|
          out.puts <<-EOS.strip_heredoc
            private #{decl_string(m.declaration)} #{m.name};
                  Severity: Minor
                  Found in lib/xdrgen/generators/java.rb - About 1 hr to fix

                  Cognitive Complexity

                  Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

                  A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

                  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
                  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
                  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

                  Further reading

                  Method render_nested_definitions has 35 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
                  Open

                        def render_nested_definitions(defn, out, post_name="implements XdrElement")
        return unless defn.respond_to? :nested_definitions
        defn.nested_definitions.each{|ndefn|
          case ndefn
          when AST::Definitions::Struct ;
                  Severity: Minor
                  Found in lib/xdrgen/generators/java.rb - About 1 hr to fix

                    Method encode_member has 34 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
                    Open

                          def encode_member(value, member, out)
        case member.declaration
          when AST::Declarations::Void
            return
        end
                    Severity: Minor
                    Found in lib/xdrgen/generators/java.rb - About 1 hr to fix

                      Method type_string has 28 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
                      Open

                            def type_string(type)
        case type
        when AST::Typespecs::Int ;
          "Integer"
        when AST::Typespecs::UnsignedInt ;
                      Severity: Minor
                      Found in lib/xdrgen/generators/java.rb - About 1 hr to fix

                        Method decode_member has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
                        Open

                              def decode_member(value, member, out)
        case member.declaration
        when AST::Declarations::Void ;
          return
        end
                        Severity: Minor
                        Found in lib/xdrgen/generators/java.rb - About 1 hr to fix

                        Cognitive Complexity

                        Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

                        A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

                        • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
                        • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
                        • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

                        Further reading

                        Method encode_member has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
                        Open

                              def encode_member(value, member, out)
        case member.declaration
          when AST::Declarations::Void
            return
        end
                        Severity: Minor
                        Found in lib/xdrgen/generators/java.rb - About 1 hr to fix

                        Cognitive Complexity

                        Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

                        A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

                        • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
                        • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
                        • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

                        Further reading

                        Method decode_type has 26 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
                        Open

                              def decode_type(decl)
        case decl.type
        when AST::Typespecs::Int ;
          "stream.readInt()"
        when AST::Typespecs::UnsignedInt ;
                        Severity: Minor
                        Found in lib/xdrgen/generators/java.rb - About 1 hr to fix

                          Method encode_type has 26 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
                          Open

                                def encode_type(type, value)
        case type
        when AST::Typespecs::Int ;
          "stream.writeInt(#{value})"
        when AST::Typespecs::UnsignedInt ;
                          Severity: Minor
                          Found in lib/xdrgen/generators/java.rb - About 1 hr to fix

                            Method render_definition has 26 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
                            Open

                                  def render_definition(defn, constants_container)
        imports = Set[]
        add_imports_for_definition(defn, imports)

        case defn
                            Severity: Minor
                            Found in lib/xdrgen/generators/java.rb - About 1 hr to fix

                              Method render_nested_definitions has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
                              Open

                                    def render_nested_definitions(defn, out, post_name="implements XdrElement")
        return unless defn.respond_to? :nested_definitions
        defn.nested_definitions.each{|ndefn|
          case ndefn
          when AST::Definitions::Struct ;
                              Severity: Minor
                              Found in lib/xdrgen/generators/java.rb - About 25 mins to fix

                              Cognitive Complexity

                              Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

                              A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

                              • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
                              • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
                              • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

                              Further reading

                              Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
                              Open

                                    def encode_type(type, value)
        case type
        when AST::Typespecs::Int ;
          "stream.writeInt(#{value})"
        when AST::Typespecs::UnsignedInt ;
                              Severity: Major
                              Found in lib/xdrgen/generators/java.rb and 1 other location - About 3 hrs to fix
                              lib/xdrgen/generators/csharp.rb on lines 384..409

                              Duplicated Code

                              Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

                              Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

                              When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

                              Tuning

                              This issue has a mass of 116.

                              We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

                              The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

                              If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

                              See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

                              Refactorings

                              Further Reading

                              Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
                              Open

                                      union.arms.each do |arm|
          case arm
            when AST::Definitions::UnionDefaultArm ;
              out.puts "default:"
            else
                              Severity: Major
                              Found in lib/xdrgen/generators/java.rb and 1 other location - About 1 hr to fix
                              lib/xdrgen/generators/java.rb on lines 554..573

                              Duplicated Code

                              Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

                              Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

                              When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

                              Tuning

                              This issue has a mass of 72.

                              We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

                              The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

                              If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

                              See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

                              Refactorings

                              Further Reading

                              Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
                              Open

                                      union.arms.each do |arm|
          case arm
            when AST::Definitions::UnionDefaultArm ;
              out.puts "default:"
            else
                              Severity: Major
                              Found in lib/xdrgen/generators/java.rb and 1 other location - About 1 hr to fix
                              lib/xdrgen/generators/java.rb on lines 598..617

                              Duplicated Code

                              Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

                              Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

                              When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

                              Tuning

                              This issue has a mass of 72.

                              We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

                              The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

                              If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

                              See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

                              Refactorings

                              Further Reading

                              Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
                              Open

                                        out.puts <<-EOS.strip_heredoc
            private #{decl_string(arm.declaration)} #{arm.name};
            public #{decl_string(arm.declaration)} get#{arm.name.slice(0,1).capitalize+arm.name.slice(1..-1)}() {
              return this.#{arm.name};
            }
                              Severity: Major
                              Found in lib/xdrgen/generators/java.rb and 1 other location - About 1 hr to fix
                              lib/xdrgen/generators/java.rb on lines 256..261

                              Duplicated Code

                              Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

                              Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

                              When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

                              Tuning

                              This issue has a mass of 57.

                              We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

                              The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

                              If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

                              See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

                              Refactorings

                              Further Reading

                              Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
                              Open

                                        out.puts <<-EOS.strip_heredoc
            private #{decl_string(m.declaration)} #{m.name};
            public #{decl_string(m.declaration)} get#{m.name.slice(0,1).capitalize+m.name.slice(1..-1)}() {
              return this.#{m.name};
            }
                              Severity: Major
                              Found in lib/xdrgen/generators/java.rb and 1 other location - About 1 hr to fix
                              lib/xdrgen/generators/java.rb on lines 479..484

                              Duplicated Code

                              Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

                              Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

                              When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

                              Tuning

                              This issue has a mass of 57.

                              We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

                              The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

                              If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

                              See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

                              Refactorings

                              Further Reading

                              Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
                              Open

                                        when AST::Definitions::Struct ;
            name = name ndefn
            out.puts "public static class #{name} #{post_name} {"
            out.indent do
              render_struct ndefn, out
                              Severity: Minor
                              Found in lib/xdrgen/generators/java.rb and 1 other location - About 25 mins to fix
                              lib/xdrgen/generators/java.rb on lines 157..164

                              Duplicated Code

                              Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

                              Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

                              When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

                              Tuning

                              This issue has a mass of 30.

                              We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

                              The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

                              If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

                              See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

                              Refactorings

                              Further Reading

                              Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
                              Open

                                        when AST::Definitions::Union ;
            name = name ndefn
            out.puts "public static class #{name} #{post_name} {"
            out.indent do
              render_union ndefn, out
                              Severity: Minor
                              Found in lib/xdrgen/generators/java.rb and 1 other location - About 25 mins to fix
                              lib/xdrgen/generators/java.rb on lines 142..149

                              Duplicated Code

                              Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

                              Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

                              When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

                              Tuning

                              This issue has a mass of 30.

                              We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

                              The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

                              If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

                              See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

                              Refactorings

                              Further Reading

                              Similar blocks of code found in 5 locations. Consider refactoring.
                              Open

                                    def render_source_comment(out, defn)
        return if defn.is_a?(AST::Definitions::Namespace)

        out.puts <<-EOS.strip_heredoc
        // === xdr source ============================================================
                              Severity: Minor
                              Found in lib/xdrgen/generators/java.rb and 4 other locations - About 20 mins to fix
                              lib/xdrgen/generators/csharp.rb on lines 289..299
                              lib/xdrgen/generators/elixir.rb on lines 47..58
                              lib/xdrgen/generators/javascript.rb on lines 47..57
                              lib/xdrgen/generators/ruby.rb on lines 172..182

                              Duplicated Code

                              Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

                              Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

                              When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

                              Tuning

                              This issue has a mass of 27.

                              We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

                              The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

                              If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

                              See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

                              Refactorings

                              Further Reading

                              Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
                              Open

                                        when AST::Definitions::Typedef ;
            name = name ndefn
            out.puts "public static class #{name} #{post_name} {"
            out.indent do
              render_typedef ndefn, out
                              Severity: Minor
                              Found in lib/xdrgen/generators/java.rb and 1 other location - About 15 mins to fix
                              lib/xdrgen/generators/java.rb on lines 150..156

                              Duplicated Code

                              Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

                              Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

                              When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

                              Tuning

                              This issue has a mass of 26.

                              We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

                              The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

                              If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

                              See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

                              Refactorings

                              Further Reading

                              Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
                              Open

                                        when AST::Definitions::Enum ;
            name = name ndefn
            out.puts "public static enum #{name} #{post_name} {"
            out.indent do
              render_enum ndefn, out
                              Severity: Minor
                              Found in lib/xdrgen/generators/java.rb and 1 other location - About 15 mins to fix
                              lib/xdrgen/generators/java.rb on lines 165..171

                              Duplicated Code

                              Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

                              Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

                              When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

                              Tuning

                              This issue has a mass of 26.

                              We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

                              The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

                              If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

                              See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

                              Refactorings

                              Further Reading

                              Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
                              Open

                                          out.puts <<-EOS.strip_heredoc

              public Builder #{m.name}(#{decl_string(m.declaration)} #{m.name}) {
                              Severity: Minor
                              Found in lib/xdrgen/generators/java.rb and 1 other location - About 15 mins to fix
                              lib/xdrgen/generators/java.rb on lines 509..511

                              Duplicated Code

                              Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

                              Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

                              When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

                              Tuning

                              This issue has a mass of 25.

                              We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

                              The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

                              If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

                              See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

                              Refactorings

                              Further Reading

                              Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
                              Open

                                          out.puts <<-EOS.strip_heredoc

              public Builder #{arm.name}(#{decl_string(arm.declaration)} #{arm.name}) {
                              Severity: Minor
                              Found in lib/xdrgen/generators/java.rb and 1 other location - About 15 mins to fix
                              lib/xdrgen/generators/java.rb on lines 359..361

                              Duplicated Code

                              Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

                              Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

                              When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

                              Tuning

                              This issue has a mass of 25.

                              We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

                              The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

                              If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

                              See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

                              Refactorings

                              Further Reading

                              There are no issues that match your filters.

                              Category
                              Status