Method render_union
has a Cognitive Complexity of 76 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def render_union(union, render_import_in_func = false)
union_name = name union
union_name_underscore = union_name.underscore
@init_out.puts "from .#{union_name_underscore} import #{union_name}"
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
File python.rb
has 597 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
module Xdrgen
module Generators
class Python < Xdrgen::Generators::Base
MAX_SIZE = (2 ** 32) - 1
CIRCLE_IMPORT_UNION = %w[SCVal SCSpecTypeDef]
Method render_union
has 132 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def render_union(union, render_import_in_func = false)
union_name = name union
union_name_underscore = union_name.underscore
@init_out.puts "from .#{union_name_underscore} import #{union_name}"
Method render_struct
has 80 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def render_struct(struct)
struct_name = name struct
struct_name_underscore = struct_name.underscore
@init_out.puts "from .#{struct_name_underscore} import #{struct_name}"
Class Python
has 24 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
class Python < Xdrgen::Generators::Base
MAX_SIZE = (2 ** 32) - 1
CIRCLE_IMPORT_UNION = %w[SCVal SCSpecTypeDef]
def generate
Method encode_member
has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def encode_member(member, out, is_union_member = false)
case member.declaration
when AST::Declarations::Void
out.puts "return"
end
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method render_typedef
has 39 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def render_typedef(typedef)
typedef_name = typedef.name.camelize
typedef_name_underscore = typedef.name.underscore
@init_out.puts "from .#{typedef_name_underscore} import #{typedef_name}"
Method encode_member
has 32 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def encode_member(member, out, is_union_member = false)
case member.declaration
when AST::Declarations::Void
out.puts "return"
end
Method type_string
has 30 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def type_string(type)
case type
when AST::Typespecs::Bool
"bool"
when AST::Typespecs::Double
Method decode_type
has 28 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def decode_type(decl)
case decl.type
when AST::Typespecs::Int
"Integer.unpack(unpacker)"
when AST::Typespecs::UnsignedInt
Method decode_member
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def decode_member(member, out)
case member.declaration
when AST::Declarations::Void;
out.puts "return"
end
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if c.value.is_a?(AST::Identifier)
out.puts "if #{union_discriminant_name_underscore} == #{type_string union.discriminant.type}.#{c.value.name}:"
else
out.puts "if #{union_discriminant_name_underscore} == #{c.value.value}:"
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 34.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if c.value.is_a?(AST::Identifier)
out.puts "if self.#{union_discriminant_name_underscore} == #{type_string union.discriminant.type}.#{c.value.name}:"
else
out.puts "if self.#{union_discriminant_name_underscore} == #{c.value.value}:"
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 34.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
out.puts <<~HEREDOC
def __hash__(self):
return hash((#{attribute_names.map { |m| 'self.' + m }.join(", ")},))
def __eq__(self, other: object):
if not isinstance(other, self.__class__):
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 29.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
out.puts <<~HEREDOC
def __hash__(self):
return hash((#{attribute_names.map { |m| 'self.' + m }.join(", ")},))
def __eq__(self, other: object):
if not isinstance(other, self.__class__):
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 29.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76