Showing 152 of 152 total issues
Function stop
has 40 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
stop: function( type, clearQueue, gotoEnd ) {
var stopQueue = function( hooks ) {
var stop = hooks.stop;
delete hooks.stop;
stop( gotoEnd );
Function on
has 40 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
on: function( types, selector, data, fn, /*INTERNAL*/ one ) {
var type, origFn;
// Types can be a map of types/handlers
if ( typeof types === "object" ) {
Function extend
has 40 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
jQuery.extend = jQuery.fn.extend = function() {
var src, copyIsArray, copy, name, options, clone,
target = arguments[0] || {},
i = 1,
length = arguments.length,
Function each
has 38 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
each: function( obj, callback, args ) {
var value,
i = 0,
length = obj.length,
isArray = isArraylike( obj );
Function ajaxHandleResponses
has 37 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function ajaxHandleResponses( s, jqXHR, responses ) {
var firstDataType, ct, finalDataType, type,
contents = s.contents,
dataTypes = s.dataTypes;
Function showHide
has 37 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function showHide( elements, show ) {
var display, elem, hidden,
values = [],
index = 0,
length = elements.length;
Function when
has 36 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
when: function( subordinate /* , ..., subordinateN */ ) {
var i = 0,
resolveValues = core_slice.call( arguments ),
length = resolveValues.length,
Function access
has 35 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
access: function( elems, fn, key, value, chainable, emptyGet, raw ) {
var i = 0,
length = elems.length,
bulk = key == null;
Function clone
has 35 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
clone: function( elem, dataAndEvents, deepDataAndEvents ) {
var destElements, node, clone, i, srcElements,
inPage = jQuery.contains( elem.ownerDocument, elem );
if ( jQuery.support.html5Clone || jQuery.isXMLDoc(elem) || !rnoshimcache.test( "<" + elem.nodeName + ">" ) ) {
Function dispatch
has 35 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
dispatch: function( event ) {
// Make a writable jQuery.Event from the native event object
event = jQuery.event.fix( event );
Function style
has 34 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
style: function( elem, name, value, extra ) {
// Don't set styles on text and comment nodes
if ( !elem || elem.nodeType === 3 || elem.nodeType === 8 || !elem.style ) {
return;
}
Function cleanData
has 34 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
cleanData: function( elems, /* internal */ acceptData ) {
var elem, type, id, data,
i = 0,
internalKey = jQuery.expando,
cache = jQuery.cache,
Consider simplifying this complex logical expression. Open
if ( start && start[ 3 ] !== unit ) {
// Trust units reported by jQuery.css
unit = unit || start[ 3 ];
// Make sure we update the tween properties later on
Consider simplifying this complex logical expression. Open
} else if ( useCache && (cache = (elem[ expando ] || (elem[ expando ] = {}))[ type ]) && cache[0] === dirruns ) {
diff = cache[1];
// xml :nth-child(...) or :nth-last-child(...) or :nth(-last)?-of-type(...)
} else {
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if ( jQuery.isFunction( value ) ) {
return this.each(function( j ) {
jQuery( this ).addClass( value.call( this, j, this.className ) );
});
}
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 61.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if ( jQuery.isFunction( value ) ) {
return this.each(function( j ) {
jQuery( this ).removeClass( value.call( this, j, this.className ) );
});
}
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 61.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Function load
has 32 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
jQuery.fn.load = function( url, params, callback ) {
if ( typeof url !== "string" && _load ) {
return _load.apply( this, arguments );
}
Function fixCloneNodeIssues
has 32 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function fixCloneNodeIssues( src, dest ) {
var nodeName, e, data;
// We do not need to do anything for non-Elements
if ( dest.nodeType !== 1 ) {
Function setOffset
has 32 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
setOffset: function( elem, options, i ) {
var position = jQuery.css( elem, "position" );
// set position first, in-case top/left are set even on static elem
if ( position === "static" ) {
Function data
has 31 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
data: function( key, value ) {
var attrs, name,
data = null,
i = 0,
elem = this[0];