Showing 784 of 784 total issues
Function setMatcher
has 6 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Open
function setMatcher( preFilter, selector, matcher, postFilter, postFinder, postSelector ) {
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
Open
if ( Expr.relative[ tokens[j].type ] ) {
break;
}
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
Open
if ( (event.result = ret) === false ) {
event.preventDefault();
event.stopPropagation();
}
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
Open
for ( type in data.events ) {
if ( special[ type ] ) {
jQuery.event.remove( elem, type );
// This is a shortcut to avoid jQuery.event.remove's overhead
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
Open
if ( attrs[ i ] ) {
name = attrs[ i ].name;
if ( name.indexOf( "data-" ) === 0 ) {
name = jQuery.camelCase( name.slice(5) );
dataAttr( elem, name, data[ name ] );
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
Open
if ( context.ownerDocument && (elem = context.ownerDocument.getElementById( m )) &&
contains( context, elem ) && elem.id === m ) {
results.push( elem );
return results;
}
Function setMatcher
has 6 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Open
function setMatcher( preFilter, selector, matcher, postFilter, postFinder, postSelector ) {
Function updateScrollParent
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Open
FastClick.prototype.updateScrollParent = function(targetElement) {
'use strict';
var scrollParent, parentElement;
scrollParent = targetElement.fastClickScrollParent;
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
Open
if ( ( ofType ? node.nodeName.toLowerCase() === name : node.nodeType === 1 ) && ++diff ) {
// Cache the index of each encountered element
if ( useCache ) {
(node[ expando ] || (node[ expando ] = {}))[ type ] = [ dirruns, diff ];
}
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
Open
if ( (elem = matcherOut[i]) ) {
// Restore matcherIn since elem is not yet a final match
temp.push( (matcherIn[i] = elem) );
}
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
Open
if ( matches[ sel ] ) {
matches.push( handleObj );
}
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
Open
if ( name in thisCache ) {
name = [ name ];
} else {
name = name.split(" ");
}
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
Open
if (avgColorAboveAvg) {
var colAbove = Plugin.prototype._getColorValue.apply(this, [avgColorAboveAvg]);
innerBar.css({'background-color':colAbove});
}
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
Open
if ( Expr.relative[ tokens[j].type ] ) {
break;
}
Function onMouse
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Open
FastClick.prototype.onMouse = function(event) {
'use strict';
// If a target element was never set (because a touch event was never fired) allow the event
if (!this.targetElement) {
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
Open
if (rng.length == 3) {
var rngColor = rng[2];
var rngCl = Plugin.prototype._getColorValue.apply(this, [rngColor]);
if (typeof rngCl !== 'undefined') {
bar.css({'background-color':rngCl});
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
Open
if (limLabelPos == 'num') {
elem.addClass('bi-limPos-num');
} else if (limLabelPos == 'title') {
elem.addClass('bi-limPos-title');
}
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
Open
if (opt.numType == 'percent') {
mlstLb += '%';
}
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
Open
if (self.attr('data-lbNum').indexOf(numArrMax) != -1 && limMaxVisible) {
self.addClass('bi-lbNum-max').find('.bi-limSpan').html(limMaxLabel).addClass('bi-limSpan-max');
}
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
Open
if ( !(unmatched[i] || setMatched[i]) ) {
setMatched[i] = pop.call( results );
}