synapsecns/sanguine

View on GitHub
ethergo/backends/mocks/simulated_test_backend.go

Summary

Maintainability
F
6 days
Test Coverage

File simulated_test_backend.go has 973 lines of code (exceeds 500 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

// Code generated by mockery v2.14.0. DO NOT EDIT.

package mocks

import (
Severity: Major
Found in ethergo/backends/mocks/simulated_test_backend.go - About 1 day to fix

    SimulatedTestBackend has 66 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

    type SimulatedTestBackend struct {
        mock.Mock
    }
    Severity: Major
    Found in ethergo/backends/mocks/simulated_test_backend.go - About 1 day to fix

      Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
      Open

      func (_m *SimulatedTestBackend) HeaderByTime(ctx context.Context, startBlock *big.Int, searchTime time.Time) (*types.Header, error) {
          ret := _m.Called(ctx, startBlock, searchTime)
      
          var r0 *types.Header
          if rf, ok := ret.Get(0).(func(context.Context, *big.Int, time.Time) *types.Header); ok {
      Severity: Major
      Found in ethergo/backends/mocks/simulated_test_backend.go and 1 other location - About 4 hrs to fix
      ethergo/chain/mocks/chain.go on lines 511..531

      Duplicated Code

      Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

      Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

      When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

      Tuning

      This issue has a mass of 314.

      We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

      The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

      If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

      See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

      Refactorings

      Further Reading

      Similar blocks of code found in 65 locations. Consider refactoring.
      Open

      func (_m *SimulatedTestBackend) NewKeyedTransactor(realSigner *bind.TransactOpts) (*bind.TransactOpts, error) {
          ret := _m.Called(realSigner)
      
          var r0 *bind.TransactOpts
          if rf, ok := ret.Get(0).(func(*bind.TransactOpts) *bind.TransactOpts); ok {
      Severity: Major
      Found in ethergo/backends/mocks/simulated_test_backend.go and 64 other locations - About 3 hrs to fix
      agents/contracts/bondingmanager/mocks/i_bonding_manager.go on lines 26..46
      agents/contracts/bondingmanager/mocks/i_bonding_manager.go on lines 288..308
      agents/contracts/bondingmanager/mocks/i_bonding_manager.go on lines 311..331
      agents/contracts/bondingmanager/mocks/i_bonding_manager.go on lines 334..354
      agents/contracts/bondingmanager/mocks/i_bonding_manager.go on lines 357..377
      agents/contracts/bondingmanager/mocks/i_bonding_manager.go on lines 426..446
      agents/contracts/bondingmanager/mocks/i_bonding_manager.go on lines 449..469
      agents/contracts/bondingmanager/mocks/i_bonding_manager.go on lines 472..492
      agents/contracts/bondingmanager/mocks/i_bonding_manager.go on lines 623..643
      agents/contracts/bondingmanager/mocks/i_bonding_manager.go on lines 761..781
      agents/contracts/bondingmanager/mocks/i_bonding_manager.go on lines 1173..1193
      agents/contracts/gasoracle/mocks/i_gas_oracle.go on lines 26..46
      agents/contracts/gasoracle/mocks/i_gas_oracle.go on lines 88..108
      agents/contracts/gasoracle/mocks/i_gas_oracle.go on lines 111..131
      agents/contracts/gasoracle/mocks/i_gas_oracle.go on lines 180..200
      agents/contracts/gasoracle/mocks/i_gas_oracle.go on lines 203..223
      agents/contracts/gasoracle/mocks/i_gas_oracle.go on lines 226..246
      agents/contracts/gasoracle/mocks/i_gas_oracle.go on lines 298..318
      agents/contracts/gasoracle/mocks/i_gas_oracle.go on lines 344..364
      agents/contracts/gasoracle/mocks/i_gas_oracle.go on lines 572..592
      agents/contracts/gasoracle/mocks/i_gas_oracle.go on lines 641..661
      agents/contracts/inbox/mocks/i_inbox.go on lines 26..46
      agents/contracts/inbox/mocks/i_inbox.go on lines 111..131
      agents/contracts/inbox/mocks/i_inbox.go on lines 134..154
      agents/contracts/inbox/mocks/i_inbox.go on lines 157..177
      agents/contracts/inbox/mocks/i_inbox.go on lines 180..200
      agents/contracts/inbox/mocks/i_inbox.go on lines 203..223
      agents/contracts/inbox/mocks/i_inbox.go on lines 226..246
      agents/contracts/inbox/mocks/i_inbox.go on lines 249..269
      agents/contracts/inbox/mocks/i_inbox.go on lines 272..292
      agents/contracts/inbox/mocks/i_inbox.go on lines 295..315
      agents/contracts/inbox/mocks/i_inbox.go on lines 364..384
      agents/contracts/inbox/mocks/i_inbox.go on lines 443..463
      agents/contracts/inbox/mocks/i_inbox.go on lines 947..967
      agents/contracts/lightinbox/mocks/i_light_inbox.go on lines 26..46
      agents/contracts/lightinbox/mocks/i_light_inbox.go on lines 111..131
      agents/contracts/lightinbox/mocks/i_light_inbox.go on lines 134..154
      agents/contracts/lightinbox/mocks/i_light_inbox.go on lines 157..177
      agents/contracts/lightinbox/mocks/i_light_inbox.go on lines 180..200
      agents/contracts/lightinbox/mocks/i_light_inbox.go on lines 203..223
      agents/contracts/lightinbox/mocks/i_light_inbox.go on lines 226..246
      agents/contracts/lightinbox/mocks/i_light_inbox.go on lines 249..269
      agents/contracts/lightinbox/mocks/i_light_inbox.go on lines 351..371
      agents/contracts/lightinbox/mocks/i_light_inbox.go on lines 740..760
      agents/contracts/lightmanager/mocks/i_light_manager.go on lines 26..46
      agents/contracts/lightmanager/mocks/i_light_manager.go on lines 109..129
      agents/contracts/lightmanager/mocks/i_light_manager.go on lines 196..216
      agents/contracts/lightmanager/mocks/i_light_manager.go on lines 219..239
      agents/contracts/lightmanager/mocks/i_light_manager.go on lines 242..262
      agents/contracts/lightmanager/mocks/i_light_manager.go on lines 265..285
      agents/contracts/lightmanager/mocks/i_light_manager.go on lines 334..354
      agents/contracts/lightmanager/mocks/i_light_manager.go on lines 357..377
      agents/contracts/lightmanager/mocks/i_light_manager.go on lines 380..400
      agents/contracts/lightmanager/mocks/i_light_manager.go on lines 508..528
      agents/contracts/lightmanager/mocks/i_light_manager.go on lines 1022..1042
      agents/contracts/lightmanager/mocks/i_light_manager.go on lines 1045..1065
      agents/contracts/origin/mocks/i_origin.go on lines 26..46
      agents/contracts/origin/mocks/i_origin.go on lines 109..129
      agents/contracts/origin/mocks/i_origin.go on lines 201..221
      agents/contracts/origin/mocks/i_origin.go on lines 224..244
      agents/contracts/origin/mocks/i_origin.go on lines 349..369
      agents/contracts/origin/mocks/i_origin.go on lines 681..701
      agents/contracts/origin/mocks/i_origin.go on lines 773..793
      ethergo/backends/mocks/simulated_test_backend.go on lines 706..726

      Duplicated Code

      Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

      Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

      When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

      Tuning

      This issue has a mass of 262.

      We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

      The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

      If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

      See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

      Refactorings

      Further Reading

      Similar blocks of code found in 65 locations. Consider refactoring.
      Open

      func (_m *SimulatedTestBackend) NewKeyedTransactorFromKey(key *ecdsa.PrivateKey) (*bind.TransactOpts, error) {
          ret := _m.Called(key)
      
          var r0 *bind.TransactOpts
          if rf, ok := ret.Get(0).(func(*ecdsa.PrivateKey) *bind.TransactOpts); ok {
      Severity: Major
      Found in ethergo/backends/mocks/simulated_test_backend.go and 64 other locations - About 3 hrs to fix
      agents/contracts/bondingmanager/mocks/i_bonding_manager.go on lines 26..46
      agents/contracts/bondingmanager/mocks/i_bonding_manager.go on lines 288..308
      agents/contracts/bondingmanager/mocks/i_bonding_manager.go on lines 311..331
      agents/contracts/bondingmanager/mocks/i_bonding_manager.go on lines 334..354
      agents/contracts/bondingmanager/mocks/i_bonding_manager.go on lines 357..377
      agents/contracts/bondingmanager/mocks/i_bonding_manager.go on lines 426..446
      agents/contracts/bondingmanager/mocks/i_bonding_manager.go on lines 449..469
      agents/contracts/bondingmanager/mocks/i_bonding_manager.go on lines 472..492
      agents/contracts/bondingmanager/mocks/i_bonding_manager.go on lines 623..643
      agents/contracts/bondingmanager/mocks/i_bonding_manager.go on lines 761..781
      agents/contracts/bondingmanager/mocks/i_bonding_manager.go on lines 1173..1193
      agents/contracts/gasoracle/mocks/i_gas_oracle.go on lines 26..46
      agents/contracts/gasoracle/mocks/i_gas_oracle.go on lines 88..108
      agents/contracts/gasoracle/mocks/i_gas_oracle.go on lines 111..131
      agents/contracts/gasoracle/mocks/i_gas_oracle.go on lines 180..200
      agents/contracts/gasoracle/mocks/i_gas_oracle.go on lines 203..223
      agents/contracts/gasoracle/mocks/i_gas_oracle.go on lines 226..246
      agents/contracts/gasoracle/mocks/i_gas_oracle.go on lines 298..318
      agents/contracts/gasoracle/mocks/i_gas_oracle.go on lines 344..364
      agents/contracts/gasoracle/mocks/i_gas_oracle.go on lines 572..592
      agents/contracts/gasoracle/mocks/i_gas_oracle.go on lines 641..661
      agents/contracts/inbox/mocks/i_inbox.go on lines 26..46
      agents/contracts/inbox/mocks/i_inbox.go on lines 111..131
      agents/contracts/inbox/mocks/i_inbox.go on lines 134..154
      agents/contracts/inbox/mocks/i_inbox.go on lines 157..177
      agents/contracts/inbox/mocks/i_inbox.go on lines 180..200
      agents/contracts/inbox/mocks/i_inbox.go on lines 203..223
      agents/contracts/inbox/mocks/i_inbox.go on lines 226..246
      agents/contracts/inbox/mocks/i_inbox.go on lines 249..269
      agents/contracts/inbox/mocks/i_inbox.go on lines 272..292
      agents/contracts/inbox/mocks/i_inbox.go on lines 295..315
      agents/contracts/inbox/mocks/i_inbox.go on lines 364..384
      agents/contracts/inbox/mocks/i_inbox.go on lines 443..463
      agents/contracts/inbox/mocks/i_inbox.go on lines 947..967
      agents/contracts/lightinbox/mocks/i_light_inbox.go on lines 26..46
      agents/contracts/lightinbox/mocks/i_light_inbox.go on lines 111..131
      agents/contracts/lightinbox/mocks/i_light_inbox.go on lines 134..154
      agents/contracts/lightinbox/mocks/i_light_inbox.go on lines 157..177
      agents/contracts/lightinbox/mocks/i_light_inbox.go on lines 180..200
      agents/contracts/lightinbox/mocks/i_light_inbox.go on lines 203..223
      agents/contracts/lightinbox/mocks/i_light_inbox.go on lines 226..246
      agents/contracts/lightinbox/mocks/i_light_inbox.go on lines 249..269
      agents/contracts/lightinbox/mocks/i_light_inbox.go on lines 351..371
      agents/contracts/lightinbox/mocks/i_light_inbox.go on lines 740..760
      agents/contracts/lightmanager/mocks/i_light_manager.go on lines 26..46
      agents/contracts/lightmanager/mocks/i_light_manager.go on lines 109..129
      agents/contracts/lightmanager/mocks/i_light_manager.go on lines 196..216
      agents/contracts/lightmanager/mocks/i_light_manager.go on lines 219..239
      agents/contracts/lightmanager/mocks/i_light_manager.go on lines 242..262
      agents/contracts/lightmanager/mocks/i_light_manager.go on lines 265..285
      agents/contracts/lightmanager/mocks/i_light_manager.go on lines 334..354
      agents/contracts/lightmanager/mocks/i_light_manager.go on lines 357..377
      agents/contracts/lightmanager/mocks/i_light_manager.go on lines 380..400
      agents/contracts/lightmanager/mocks/i_light_manager.go on lines 508..528
      agents/contracts/lightmanager/mocks/i_light_manager.go on lines 1022..1042
      agents/contracts/lightmanager/mocks/i_light_manager.go on lines 1045..1065
      agents/contracts/origin/mocks/i_origin.go on lines 26..46
      agents/contracts/origin/mocks/i_origin.go on lines 109..129
      agents/contracts/origin/mocks/i_origin.go on lines 201..221
      agents/contracts/origin/mocks/i_origin.go on lines 224..244
      agents/contracts/origin/mocks/i_origin.go on lines 349..369
      agents/contracts/origin/mocks/i_origin.go on lines 681..701
      agents/contracts/origin/mocks/i_origin.go on lines 773..793
      ethergo/backends/mocks/simulated_test_backend.go on lines 683..703

      Duplicated Code

      Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

      Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

      When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

      Tuning

      This issue has a mass of 262.

      We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

      The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

      If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

      See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

      Refactorings

      Further Reading

      Similar blocks of code found in 10 locations. Consider refactoring.
      Open

      func (_m *SimulatedTestBackend) GetBigChainID() *big.Int {
          ret := _m.Called()
      
          var r0 *big.Int
          if rf, ok := ret.Get(0).(func() *big.Int); ok {
      Severity: Major
      Found in ethergo/backends/mocks/simulated_test_backend.go and 9 other locations - About 1 hr to fix
      ethergo/backends/mocks/simulated_test_backend.go on lines 265..278
      ethergo/backends/mocks/simulated_test_backend.go on lines 1125..1138
      ethergo/chain/gas/backend/mocks/oracle_backend_chain.go on lines 70..83
      ethergo/chain/mocks/chain.go on lines 216..229
      ethergo/chain/mocks/chain.go on lines 419..432
      ethergo/contracts/mocks/contract_type.go on lines 17..30
      ethergo/contracts/mocks/deployed_contract.go on lines 37..50
      ethergo/contracts/mocks/deployed_contract.go on lines 69..82
      ethergo/contracts/mocks/deployed_contract.go on lines 101..114

      Duplicated Code

      Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

      Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

      When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

      Tuning

      This issue has a mass of 155.

      We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

      The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

      If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

      See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

      Refactorings

      Further Reading

      Similar blocks of code found in 10 locations. Consider refactoring.
      Open

      func (_m *SimulatedTestBackend) ChainConfig() *params.ChainConfig {
          ret := _m.Called()
      
          var r0 *params.ChainConfig
          if rf, ok := ret.Get(0).(func() *params.ChainConfig); ok {
      Severity: Major
      Found in ethergo/backends/mocks/simulated_test_backend.go and 9 other locations - About 1 hr to fix
      ethergo/backends/mocks/simulated_test_backend.go on lines 478..491
      ethergo/backends/mocks/simulated_test_backend.go on lines 1125..1138
      ethergo/chain/gas/backend/mocks/oracle_backend_chain.go on lines 70..83
      ethergo/chain/mocks/chain.go on lines 216..229
      ethergo/chain/mocks/chain.go on lines 419..432
      ethergo/contracts/mocks/contract_type.go on lines 17..30
      ethergo/contracts/mocks/deployed_contract.go on lines 37..50
      ethergo/contracts/mocks/deployed_contract.go on lines 69..82
      ethergo/contracts/mocks/deployed_contract.go on lines 101..114

      Duplicated Code

      Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

      Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

      When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

      Tuning

      This issue has a mass of 155.

      We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

      The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

      If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

      See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

      Refactorings

      Further Reading

      Similar blocks of code found in 10 locations. Consider refactoring.
      Open

      func (_m *SimulatedTestBackend) T() *testing.T {
          ret := _m.Called()
      
          var r0 *testing.T
          if rf, ok := ret.Get(0).(func() *testing.T); ok {
      Severity: Major
      Found in ethergo/backends/mocks/simulated_test_backend.go and 9 other locations - About 1 hr to fix
      ethergo/backends/mocks/simulated_test_backend.go on lines 265..278
      ethergo/backends/mocks/simulated_test_backend.go on lines 478..491
      ethergo/chain/gas/backend/mocks/oracle_backend_chain.go on lines 70..83
      ethergo/chain/mocks/chain.go on lines 216..229
      ethergo/chain/mocks/chain.go on lines 419..432
      ethergo/contracts/mocks/contract_type.go on lines 17..30
      ethergo/contracts/mocks/deployed_contract.go on lines 37..50
      ethergo/contracts/mocks/deployed_contract.go on lines 69..82
      ethergo/contracts/mocks/deployed_contract.go on lines 101..114

      Duplicated Code

      Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

      Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

      When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

      Tuning

      This issue has a mass of 155.

      We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

      The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

      If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

      See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

      Refactorings

      Further Reading

      Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.
      Open

      func (_m *SimulatedTestBackend) VerifyContract(contractType contracts.ContractType, contract contracts.DeployedContract) error {
          ret := _m.Called(contractType, contract)
      
          var r0 error
          if rf, ok := ret.Get(0).(func(contracts.ContractType, contracts.DeployedContract) error); ok {
      Severity: Major
      Found in ethergo/backends/mocks/simulated_test_backend.go and 2 other locations - About 1 hr to fix
      ethergo/listener/mocks/contract_listener.go on lines 51..62
      ethergo/submitter/db/mocks/service.go on lines 24..35

      Duplicated Code

      Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

      Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

      When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

      Tuning

      This issue has a mass of 149.

      We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

      The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

      If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

      See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

      Refactorings

      Further Reading

      Similar blocks of code found in 19 locations. Consider refactoring.
      Open

      func (_m *SimulatedTestBackend) GasSetter() gas.Setter {
          ret := _m.Called()
      
          var r0 gas.Setter
          if rf, ok := ret.Get(0).(func() gas.Setter); ok {
      Severity: Major
      Found in ethergo/backends/mocks/simulated_test_backend.go and 18 other locations - About 1 hr to fix
      agents/contracts/bondingmanager/mocks/i_bonding_manager.go on lines 72..85
      agents/contracts/gasoracle/mocks/i_gas_oracle.go on lines 49..62
      agents/contracts/inbox/mocks/i_inbox.go on lines 49..62
      agents/contracts/lightinbox/mocks/i_light_inbox.go on lines 49..62
      agents/contracts/lightmanager/mocks/i_light_manager.go on lines 49..62
      agents/contracts/origin/mocks/i_origin.go on lines 49..62
      agents/contracts/origin/mocks/i_origin.go on lines 642..655
      ethergo/backends/mocks/simulated_test_backend.go on lines 395..408
      ethergo/backends/mocks/simulated_test_backend.go on lines 524..537
      ethergo/backends/mocks/simulated_test_backend.go on lines 966..979
      ethergo/chain/mocks/chain.go on lines 341..354
      ethergo/chain/mocks/chain.go on lines 403..416
      ethergo/chain/mocks/chain.go on lines 449..462
      ethergo/contracts/mocks/deployed_contract.go on lines 21..34
      ethergo/contracts/mocks/deployed_contract.go on lines 85..98
      ethergo/listener/mocks/contract_listener.go on lines 21..34
      ethergo/signer/signer/mocks/signer.go on lines 26..39
      ethergo/signer/signer/mocks/signer.go on lines 65..78

      Duplicated Code

      Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

      Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

      When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

      Tuning

      This issue has a mass of 147.

      We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

      The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

      If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

      See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

      Refactorings

      Further Reading

      Similar blocks of code found in 19 locations. Consider refactoring.
      Open

      func (_m *SimulatedTestBackend) Signer() types.Signer {
          ret := _m.Called()
      
          var r0 types.Signer
          if rf, ok := ret.Get(0).(func() types.Signer); ok {
      Severity: Major
      Found in ethergo/backends/mocks/simulated_test_backend.go and 18 other locations - About 1 hr to fix
      agents/contracts/bondingmanager/mocks/i_bonding_manager.go on lines 72..85
      agents/contracts/gasoracle/mocks/i_gas_oracle.go on lines 49..62
      agents/contracts/inbox/mocks/i_inbox.go on lines 49..62
      agents/contracts/lightinbox/mocks/i_light_inbox.go on lines 49..62
      agents/contracts/lightmanager/mocks/i_light_manager.go on lines 49..62
      agents/contracts/origin/mocks/i_origin.go on lines 49..62
      agents/contracts/origin/mocks/i_origin.go on lines 642..655
      ethergo/backends/mocks/simulated_test_backend.go on lines 395..408
      ethergo/backends/mocks/simulated_test_backend.go on lines 462..475
      ethergo/backends/mocks/simulated_test_backend.go on lines 524..537
      ethergo/chain/mocks/chain.go on lines 341..354
      ethergo/chain/mocks/chain.go on lines 403..416
      ethergo/chain/mocks/chain.go on lines 449..462
      ethergo/contracts/mocks/deployed_contract.go on lines 21..34
      ethergo/contracts/mocks/deployed_contract.go on lines 85..98
      ethergo/listener/mocks/contract_listener.go on lines 21..34
      ethergo/signer/signer/mocks/signer.go on lines 26..39
      ethergo/signer/signer/mocks/signer.go on lines 65..78

      Duplicated Code

      Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

      Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

      When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

      Tuning

      This issue has a mass of 147.

      We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

      The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

      If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

      See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

      Refactorings

      Further Reading

      Similar blocks of code found in 19 locations. Consider refactoring.
      Open

      func (_m *SimulatedTestBackend) Estimator() gas.PriceEstimator {
          ret := _m.Called()
      
          var r0 gas.PriceEstimator
          if rf, ok := ret.Get(0).(func() gas.PriceEstimator); ok {
      Severity: Major
      Found in ethergo/backends/mocks/simulated_test_backend.go and 18 other locations - About 1 hr to fix
      agents/contracts/bondingmanager/mocks/i_bonding_manager.go on lines 72..85
      agents/contracts/gasoracle/mocks/i_gas_oracle.go on lines 49..62
      agents/contracts/inbox/mocks/i_inbox.go on lines 49..62
      agents/contracts/lightinbox/mocks/i_light_inbox.go on lines 49..62
      agents/contracts/lightmanager/mocks/i_light_manager.go on lines 49..62
      agents/contracts/origin/mocks/i_origin.go on lines 49..62
      agents/contracts/origin/mocks/i_origin.go on lines 642..655
      ethergo/backends/mocks/simulated_test_backend.go on lines 462..475
      ethergo/backends/mocks/simulated_test_backend.go on lines 524..537
      ethergo/backends/mocks/simulated_test_backend.go on lines 966..979
      ethergo/chain/mocks/chain.go on lines 341..354
      ethergo/chain/mocks/chain.go on lines 403..416
      ethergo/chain/mocks/chain.go on lines 449..462
      ethergo/contracts/mocks/deployed_contract.go on lines 21..34
      ethergo/contracts/mocks/deployed_contract.go on lines 85..98
      ethergo/listener/mocks/contract_listener.go on lines 21..34
      ethergo/signer/signer/mocks/signer.go on lines 26..39
      ethergo/signer/signer/mocks/signer.go on lines 65..78

      Duplicated Code

      Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

      Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

      When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

      Tuning

      This issue has a mass of 147.

      We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

      The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

      If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

      See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

      Refactorings

      Further Reading

      Similar blocks of code found in 19 locations. Consider refactoring.
      Open

      func (_m *SimulatedTestBackend) GetHeightWatcher() chainwatcher.BlockHeightWatcher {
          ret := _m.Called()
      
          var r0 chainwatcher.BlockHeightWatcher
          if rf, ok := ret.Get(0).(func() chainwatcher.BlockHeightWatcher); ok {
      Severity: Major
      Found in ethergo/backends/mocks/simulated_test_backend.go and 18 other locations - About 1 hr to fix
      agents/contracts/bondingmanager/mocks/i_bonding_manager.go on lines 72..85
      agents/contracts/gasoracle/mocks/i_gas_oracle.go on lines 49..62
      agents/contracts/inbox/mocks/i_inbox.go on lines 49..62
      agents/contracts/lightinbox/mocks/i_light_inbox.go on lines 49..62
      agents/contracts/lightmanager/mocks/i_light_manager.go on lines 49..62
      agents/contracts/origin/mocks/i_origin.go on lines 49..62
      agents/contracts/origin/mocks/i_origin.go on lines 642..655
      ethergo/backends/mocks/simulated_test_backend.go on lines 395..408
      ethergo/backends/mocks/simulated_test_backend.go on lines 462..475
      ethergo/backends/mocks/simulated_test_backend.go on lines 966..979
      ethergo/chain/mocks/chain.go on lines 341..354
      ethergo/chain/mocks/chain.go on lines 403..416
      ethergo/chain/mocks/chain.go on lines 449..462
      ethergo/contracts/mocks/deployed_contract.go on lines 21..34
      ethergo/contracts/mocks/deployed_contract.go on lines 85..98
      ethergo/listener/mocks/contract_listener.go on lines 21..34
      ethergo/signer/signer/mocks/signer.go on lines 26..39
      ethergo/signer/signer/mocks/signer.go on lines 65..78

      Duplicated Code

      Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

      Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

      When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

      Tuning

      This issue has a mass of 147.

      We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

      The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

      If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

      See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

      Refactorings

      Further Reading

      Similar blocks of code found in 27 locations. Consider refactoring.
      Open

      func (_m *SimulatedTestBackend) ChainName() string {
          ret := _m.Called()
      
          var r0 string
          if rf, ok := ret.Get(0).(func() string); ok {
      Severity: Major
      Found in ethergo/backends/mocks/simulated_test_backend.go and 26 other locations - About 45 mins to fix
      ethergo/backends/mocks/simulated_test_backend.go on lines 51..62
      ethergo/backends/mocks/simulated_test_backend.go on lines 65..76
      ethergo/backends/mocks/simulated_test_backend.go on lines 323..334
      ethergo/backends/mocks/simulated_test_backend.go on lines 360..371
      ethergo/backends/mocks/simulated_test_backend.go on lines 494..505
      ethergo/backends/mocks/simulated_test_backend.go on lines 884..895
      ethergo/backends/mocks/simulated_test_backend.go on lines 898..909
      ethergo/chain/client/mocks/metered_evm_client.go on lines 29..40
      ethergo/chain/client/mocks/metered_evm_client.go on lines 231..242
      ethergo/chain/client/mocks/metered_evm_client.go on lines 268..279
      ethergo/chain/client/mocks/metered_evm_client.go on lines 573..584
      ethergo/chain/mocks/chain.go on lines 37..48
      ethergo/chain/mocks/chain.go on lines 255..266
      ethergo/chain/mocks/chain.go on lines 269..280
      ethergo/chain/mocks/chain.go on lines 306..317
      ethergo/chain/mocks/chain.go on lines 435..446
      ethergo/chain/mocks/chain.go on lines 712..723
      ethergo/chain/mocks/chain.go on lines 726..737
      ethergo/contracts/mocks/contract_type.go on lines 33..44
      ethergo/contracts/mocks/contract_type.go on lines 47..58
      ethergo/contracts/mocks/contract_type.go on lines 61..72
      ethergo/contracts/mocks/deployed_contract.go on lines 117..128
      ethergo/listener/mocks/contract_listener.go on lines 37..48
      services/omnirpc/chainmanager/mocks/chain.go on lines 13..24
      services/omnirpc/chainmanager/mocks/chain.go on lines 27..38
      services/omnirpc/http/mocks/response.go on lines 29..40

      Duplicated Code

      Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

      Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

      When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

      Tuning

      This issue has a mass of 113.

      We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

      The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

      If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

      See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

      Refactorings

      Further Reading

      Similar blocks of code found in 27 locations. Consider refactoring.
      Open

      func (_m *SimulatedTestBackend) ConcurrencyCount() int32 {
          ret := _m.Called()
      
          var r0 int32
          if rf, ok := ret.Get(0).(func() int32); ok {
      Severity: Major
      Found in ethergo/backends/mocks/simulated_test_backend.go and 26 other locations - About 45 mins to fix
      ethergo/backends/mocks/simulated_test_backend.go on lines 51..62
      ethergo/backends/mocks/simulated_test_backend.go on lines 65..76
      ethergo/backends/mocks/simulated_test_backend.go on lines 304..315
      ethergo/backends/mocks/simulated_test_backend.go on lines 323..334
      ethergo/backends/mocks/simulated_test_backend.go on lines 494..505
      ethergo/backends/mocks/simulated_test_backend.go on lines 884..895
      ethergo/backends/mocks/simulated_test_backend.go on lines 898..909
      ethergo/chain/client/mocks/metered_evm_client.go on lines 29..40
      ethergo/chain/client/mocks/metered_evm_client.go on lines 231..242
      ethergo/chain/client/mocks/metered_evm_client.go on lines 268..279
      ethergo/chain/client/mocks/metered_evm_client.go on lines 573..584
      ethergo/chain/mocks/chain.go on lines 37..48
      ethergo/chain/mocks/chain.go on lines 255..266
      ethergo/chain/mocks/chain.go on lines 269..280
      ethergo/chain/mocks/chain.go on lines 306..317
      ethergo/chain/mocks/chain.go on lines 435..446
      ethergo/chain/mocks/chain.go on lines 712..723
      ethergo/chain/mocks/chain.go on lines 726..737
      ethergo/contracts/mocks/contract_type.go on lines 33..44
      ethergo/contracts/mocks/contract_type.go on lines 47..58
      ethergo/contracts/mocks/contract_type.go on lines 61..72
      ethergo/contracts/mocks/deployed_contract.go on lines 117..128
      ethergo/listener/mocks/contract_listener.go on lines 37..48
      services/omnirpc/chainmanager/mocks/chain.go on lines 13..24
      services/omnirpc/chainmanager/mocks/chain.go on lines 27..38
      services/omnirpc/http/mocks/response.go on lines 29..40

      Duplicated Code

      Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

      Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

      When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

      Tuning

      This issue has a mass of 113.

      We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

      The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

      If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

      See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

      Refactorings

      Further Reading

      Similar blocks of code found in 27 locations. Consider refactoring.
      Open

      func (_m *SimulatedTestBackend) RPCAddress() string {
          ret := _m.Called()
      
          var r0 string
          if rf, ok := ret.Get(0).(func() string); ok {
      Severity: Major
      Found in ethergo/backends/mocks/simulated_test_backend.go and 26 other locations - About 45 mins to fix
      ethergo/backends/mocks/simulated_test_backend.go on lines 51..62
      ethergo/backends/mocks/simulated_test_backend.go on lines 65..76
      ethergo/backends/mocks/simulated_test_backend.go on lines 304..315
      ethergo/backends/mocks/simulated_test_backend.go on lines 323..334
      ethergo/backends/mocks/simulated_test_backend.go on lines 360..371
      ethergo/backends/mocks/simulated_test_backend.go on lines 494..505
      ethergo/backends/mocks/simulated_test_backend.go on lines 898..909
      ethergo/chain/client/mocks/metered_evm_client.go on lines 29..40
      ethergo/chain/client/mocks/metered_evm_client.go on lines 231..242
      ethergo/chain/client/mocks/metered_evm_client.go on lines 268..279
      ethergo/chain/client/mocks/metered_evm_client.go on lines 573..584
      ethergo/chain/mocks/chain.go on lines 37..48
      ethergo/chain/mocks/chain.go on lines 255..266
      ethergo/chain/mocks/chain.go on lines 269..280
      ethergo/chain/mocks/chain.go on lines 306..317
      ethergo/chain/mocks/chain.go on lines 435..446
      ethergo/chain/mocks/chain.go on lines 712..723
      ethergo/chain/mocks/chain.go on lines 726..737
      ethergo/contracts/mocks/contract_type.go on lines 33..44
      ethergo/contracts/mocks/contract_type.go on lines 47..58
      ethergo/contracts/mocks/contract_type.go on lines 61..72
      ethergo/contracts/mocks/deployed_contract.go on lines 117..128
      ethergo/listener/mocks/contract_listener.go on lines 37..48
      services/omnirpc/chainmanager/mocks/chain.go on lines 13..24
      services/omnirpc/chainmanager/mocks/chain.go on lines 27..38
      services/omnirpc/http/mocks/response.go on lines 29..40

      Duplicated Code

      Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

      Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

      When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

      Tuning

      This issue has a mass of 113.

      We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

      The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

      If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

      See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

      Refactorings

      Further Reading

      Similar blocks of code found in 27 locations. Consider refactoring.
      Open

      func (_m *SimulatedTestBackend) ClientID() string {
          ret := _m.Called()
      
          var r0 string
          if rf, ok := ret.Get(0).(func() string); ok {
      Severity: Major
      Found in ethergo/backends/mocks/simulated_test_backend.go and 26 other locations - About 45 mins to fix
      ethergo/backends/mocks/simulated_test_backend.go on lines 51..62
      ethergo/backends/mocks/simulated_test_backend.go on lines 65..76
      ethergo/backends/mocks/simulated_test_backend.go on lines 304..315
      ethergo/backends/mocks/simulated_test_backend.go on lines 360..371
      ethergo/backends/mocks/simulated_test_backend.go on lines 494..505
      ethergo/backends/mocks/simulated_test_backend.go on lines 884..895
      ethergo/backends/mocks/simulated_test_backend.go on lines 898..909
      ethergo/chain/client/mocks/metered_evm_client.go on lines 29..40
      ethergo/chain/client/mocks/metered_evm_client.go on lines 231..242
      ethergo/chain/client/mocks/metered_evm_client.go on lines 268..279
      ethergo/chain/client/mocks/metered_evm_client.go on lines 573..584
      ethergo/chain/mocks/chain.go on lines 37..48
      ethergo/chain/mocks/chain.go on lines 255..266
      ethergo/chain/mocks/chain.go on lines 269..280
      ethergo/chain/mocks/chain.go on lines 306..317
      ethergo/chain/mocks/chain.go on lines 435..446
      ethergo/chain/mocks/chain.go on lines 712..723
      ethergo/chain/mocks/chain.go on lines 726..737
      ethergo/contracts/mocks/contract_type.go on lines 33..44
      ethergo/contracts/mocks/contract_type.go on lines 47..58
      ethergo/contracts/mocks/contract_type.go on lines 61..72
      ethergo/contracts/mocks/deployed_contract.go on lines 117..128
      ethergo/listener/mocks/contract_listener.go on lines 37..48
      services/omnirpc/chainmanager/mocks/chain.go on lines 13..24
      services/omnirpc/chainmanager/mocks/chain.go on lines 27..38
      services/omnirpc/http/mocks/response.go on lines 29..40

      Duplicated Code

      Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

      Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

      When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

      Tuning

      This issue has a mass of 113.

      We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

      The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

      If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

      See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

      Refactorings

      Further Reading

      Similar blocks of code found in 27 locations. Consider refactoring.
      Open

      func (_m *SimulatedTestBackend) BackendName() string {
          ret := _m.Called()
      
          var r0 string
          if rf, ok := ret.Get(0).(func() string); ok {
      Severity: Major
      Found in ethergo/backends/mocks/simulated_test_backend.go and 26 other locations - About 45 mins to fix
      ethergo/backends/mocks/simulated_test_backend.go on lines 51..62
      ethergo/backends/mocks/simulated_test_backend.go on lines 304..315
      ethergo/backends/mocks/simulated_test_backend.go on lines 323..334
      ethergo/backends/mocks/simulated_test_backend.go on lines 360..371
      ethergo/backends/mocks/simulated_test_backend.go on lines 494..505
      ethergo/backends/mocks/simulated_test_backend.go on lines 884..895
      ethergo/backends/mocks/simulated_test_backend.go on lines 898..909
      ethergo/chain/client/mocks/metered_evm_client.go on lines 29..40
      ethergo/chain/client/mocks/metered_evm_client.go on lines 231..242
      ethergo/chain/client/mocks/metered_evm_client.go on lines 268..279
      ethergo/chain/client/mocks/metered_evm_client.go on lines 573..584
      ethergo/chain/mocks/chain.go on lines 37..48
      ethergo/chain/mocks/chain.go on lines 255..266
      ethergo/chain/mocks/chain.go on lines 269..280
      ethergo/chain/mocks/chain.go on lines 306..317
      ethergo/chain/mocks/chain.go on lines 435..446
      ethergo/chain/mocks/chain.go on lines 712..723
      ethergo/chain/mocks/chain.go on lines 726..737
      ethergo/contracts/mocks/contract_type.go on lines 33..44
      ethergo/contracts/mocks/contract_type.go on lines 47..58
      ethergo/contracts/mocks/contract_type.go on lines 61..72
      ethergo/contracts/mocks/deployed_contract.go on lines 117..128
      ethergo/listener/mocks/contract_listener.go on lines 37..48
      services/omnirpc/chainmanager/mocks/chain.go on lines 13..24
      services/omnirpc/chainmanager/mocks/chain.go on lines 27..38
      services/omnirpc/http/mocks/response.go on lines 29..40

      Duplicated Code

      Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

      Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

      When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

      Tuning

      This issue has a mass of 113.

      We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

      The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

      If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

      See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

      Refactorings

      Further Reading

      Similar blocks of code found in 27 locations. Consider refactoring.
      Open

      func (_m *SimulatedTestBackend) GetChainID() uint {
          ret := _m.Called()
      
          var r0 uint
          if rf, ok := ret.Get(0).(func() uint); ok {
      Severity: Major
      Found in ethergo/backends/mocks/simulated_test_backend.go and 26 other locations - About 45 mins to fix
      ethergo/backends/mocks/simulated_test_backend.go on lines 51..62
      ethergo/backends/mocks/simulated_test_backend.go on lines 65..76
      ethergo/backends/mocks/simulated_test_backend.go on lines 304..315
      ethergo/backends/mocks/simulated_test_backend.go on lines 323..334
      ethergo/backends/mocks/simulated_test_backend.go on lines 360..371
      ethergo/backends/mocks/simulated_test_backend.go on lines 884..895
      ethergo/backends/mocks/simulated_test_backend.go on lines 898..909
      ethergo/chain/client/mocks/metered_evm_client.go on lines 29..40
      ethergo/chain/client/mocks/metered_evm_client.go on lines 231..242
      ethergo/chain/client/mocks/metered_evm_client.go on lines 268..279
      ethergo/chain/client/mocks/metered_evm_client.go on lines 573..584
      ethergo/chain/mocks/chain.go on lines 37..48
      ethergo/chain/mocks/chain.go on lines 255..266
      ethergo/chain/mocks/chain.go on lines 269..280
      ethergo/chain/mocks/chain.go on lines 306..317
      ethergo/chain/mocks/chain.go on lines 435..446
      ethergo/chain/mocks/chain.go on lines 712..723
      ethergo/chain/mocks/chain.go on lines 726..737
      ethergo/contracts/mocks/contract_type.go on lines 33..44
      ethergo/contracts/mocks/contract_type.go on lines 47..58
      ethergo/contracts/mocks/contract_type.go on lines 61..72
      ethergo/contracts/mocks/deployed_contract.go on lines 117..128
      ethergo/listener/mocks/contract_listener.go on lines 37..48
      services/omnirpc/chainmanager/mocks/chain.go on lines 13..24
      services/omnirpc/chainmanager/mocks/chain.go on lines 27..38
      services/omnirpc/http/mocks/response.go on lines 29..40

      Duplicated Code

      Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

      Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

      When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

      Tuning

      This issue has a mass of 113.

      We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

      The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

      If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

      See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

      Refactorings

      Further Reading

      Similar blocks of code found in 27 locations. Consider refactoring.
      Open

      func (_m *SimulatedTestBackend) AttemptReconnect() bool {
          ret := _m.Called()
      
          var r0 bool
          if rf, ok := ret.Get(0).(func() bool); ok {
      Severity: Major
      Found in ethergo/backends/mocks/simulated_test_backend.go and 26 other locations - About 45 mins to fix
      ethergo/backends/mocks/simulated_test_backend.go on lines 65..76
      ethergo/backends/mocks/simulated_test_backend.go on lines 304..315
      ethergo/backends/mocks/simulated_test_backend.go on lines 323..334
      ethergo/backends/mocks/simulated_test_backend.go on lines 360..371
      ethergo/backends/mocks/simulated_test_backend.go on lines 494..505
      ethergo/backends/mocks/simulated_test_backend.go on lines 884..895
      ethergo/backends/mocks/simulated_test_backend.go on lines 898..909
      ethergo/chain/client/mocks/metered_evm_client.go on lines 29..40
      ethergo/chain/client/mocks/metered_evm_client.go on lines 231..242
      ethergo/chain/client/mocks/metered_evm_client.go on lines 268..279
      ethergo/chain/client/mocks/metered_evm_client.go on lines 573..584
      ethergo/chain/mocks/chain.go on lines 37..48
      ethergo/chain/mocks/chain.go on lines 255..266
      ethergo/chain/mocks/chain.go on lines 269..280
      ethergo/chain/mocks/chain.go on lines 306..317
      ethergo/chain/mocks/chain.go on lines 435..446
      ethergo/chain/mocks/chain.go on lines 712..723
      ethergo/chain/mocks/chain.go on lines 726..737
      ethergo/contracts/mocks/contract_type.go on lines 33..44
      ethergo/contracts/mocks/contract_type.go on lines 47..58
      ethergo/contracts/mocks/contract_type.go on lines 61..72
      ethergo/contracts/mocks/deployed_contract.go on lines 117..128
      ethergo/listener/mocks/contract_listener.go on lines 37..48
      services/omnirpc/chainmanager/mocks/chain.go on lines 13..24
      services/omnirpc/chainmanager/mocks/chain.go on lines 27..38
      services/omnirpc/http/mocks/response.go on lines 29..40

      Duplicated Code

      Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

      Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

      When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

      Tuning

      This issue has a mass of 113.

      We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

      The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

      If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

      See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

      Refactorings

      Further Reading

      Similar blocks of code found in 27 locations. Consider refactoring.
      Open

      func (_m *SimulatedTestBackend) RequestCount() int64 {
          ret := _m.Called()
      
          var r0 int64
          if rf, ok := ret.Get(0).(func() int64); ok {
      Severity: Major
      Found in ethergo/backends/mocks/simulated_test_backend.go and 26 other locations - About 45 mins to fix
      ethergo/backends/mocks/simulated_test_backend.go on lines 51..62
      ethergo/backends/mocks/simulated_test_backend.go on lines 65..76
      ethergo/backends/mocks/simulated_test_backend.go on lines 304..315
      ethergo/backends/mocks/simulated_test_backend.go on lines 323..334
      ethergo/backends/mocks/simulated_test_backend.go on lines 360..371
      ethergo/backends/mocks/simulated_test_backend.go on lines 494..505
      ethergo/backends/mocks/simulated_test_backend.go on lines 884..895
      ethergo/chain/client/mocks/metered_evm_client.go on lines 29..40
      ethergo/chain/client/mocks/metered_evm_client.go on lines 231..242
      ethergo/chain/client/mocks/metered_evm_client.go on lines 268..279
      ethergo/chain/client/mocks/metered_evm_client.go on lines 573..584
      ethergo/chain/mocks/chain.go on lines 37..48
      ethergo/chain/mocks/chain.go on lines 255..266
      ethergo/chain/mocks/chain.go on lines 269..280
      ethergo/chain/mocks/chain.go on lines 306..317
      ethergo/chain/mocks/chain.go on lines 435..446
      ethergo/chain/mocks/chain.go on lines 712..723
      ethergo/chain/mocks/chain.go on lines 726..737
      ethergo/contracts/mocks/contract_type.go on lines 33..44
      ethergo/contracts/mocks/contract_type.go on lines 47..58
      ethergo/contracts/mocks/contract_type.go on lines 61..72
      ethergo/contracts/mocks/deployed_contract.go on lines 117..128
      ethergo/listener/mocks/contract_listener.go on lines 37..48
      services/omnirpc/chainmanager/mocks/chain.go on lines 13..24
      services/omnirpc/chainmanager/mocks/chain.go on lines 27..38
      services/omnirpc/http/mocks/response.go on lines 29..40

      Duplicated Code

      Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

      Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

      When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

      Tuning

      This issue has a mass of 113.

      We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

      The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

      If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

      See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

      Refactorings

      Further Reading

      There are no issues that match your filters.

      Category
      Status