synapsecns/sanguine

View on GitHub
ethergo/chain/client/mocks/metered_evm_client.go

Summary

Maintainability
D
1 day
Test Coverage

File metered_evm_client.go has 664 lines of code (exceeds 500 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

// Code generated by mockery v2.14.0. DO NOT EDIT.

package mocks

import (
Severity: Minor
Found in ethergo/chain/client/mocks/metered_evm_client.go - About 5 hrs to fix

    MeteredEVMClient has 39 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

    type MeteredEVMClient struct {
        mock.Mock
    }
    Severity: Minor
    Found in ethergo/chain/client/mocks/metered_evm_client.go - About 5 hrs to fix

      Similar blocks of code found in 27 locations. Consider refactoring.
      Open

      func (_m *MeteredEVMClient) ConcurrencyCount() int32 {
          ret := _m.Called()
      
          var r0 int32
          if rf, ok := ret.Get(0).(func() int32); ok {
      Severity: Major
      Found in ethergo/chain/client/mocks/metered_evm_client.go and 26 other locations - About 45 mins to fix
      ethergo/backends/mocks/simulated_test_backend.go on lines 51..62
      ethergo/backends/mocks/simulated_test_backend.go on lines 65..76
      ethergo/backends/mocks/simulated_test_backend.go on lines 304..315
      ethergo/backends/mocks/simulated_test_backend.go on lines 323..334
      ethergo/backends/mocks/simulated_test_backend.go on lines 360..371
      ethergo/backends/mocks/simulated_test_backend.go on lines 494..505
      ethergo/backends/mocks/simulated_test_backend.go on lines 884..895
      ethergo/backends/mocks/simulated_test_backend.go on lines 898..909
      ethergo/chain/client/mocks/metered_evm_client.go on lines 29..40
      ethergo/chain/client/mocks/metered_evm_client.go on lines 231..242
      ethergo/chain/client/mocks/metered_evm_client.go on lines 573..584
      ethergo/chain/mocks/chain.go on lines 37..48
      ethergo/chain/mocks/chain.go on lines 255..266
      ethergo/chain/mocks/chain.go on lines 269..280
      ethergo/chain/mocks/chain.go on lines 306..317
      ethergo/chain/mocks/chain.go on lines 435..446
      ethergo/chain/mocks/chain.go on lines 712..723
      ethergo/chain/mocks/chain.go on lines 726..737
      ethergo/contracts/mocks/contract_type.go on lines 33..44
      ethergo/contracts/mocks/contract_type.go on lines 47..58
      ethergo/contracts/mocks/contract_type.go on lines 61..72
      ethergo/contracts/mocks/deployed_contract.go on lines 117..128
      ethergo/listener/mocks/contract_listener.go on lines 37..48
      services/omnirpc/chainmanager/mocks/chain.go on lines 13..24
      services/omnirpc/chainmanager/mocks/chain.go on lines 27..38
      services/omnirpc/http/mocks/response.go on lines 29..40

      Duplicated Code

      Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

      Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

      When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

      Tuning

      This issue has a mass of 113.

      We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

      The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

      If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

      See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

      Refactorings

      Further Reading

      Similar blocks of code found in 27 locations. Consider refactoring.
      Open

      func (_m *MeteredEVMClient) ClientID() string {
          ret := _m.Called()
      
          var r0 string
          if rf, ok := ret.Get(0).(func() string); ok {
      Severity: Major
      Found in ethergo/chain/client/mocks/metered_evm_client.go and 26 other locations - About 45 mins to fix
      ethergo/backends/mocks/simulated_test_backend.go on lines 51..62
      ethergo/backends/mocks/simulated_test_backend.go on lines 65..76
      ethergo/backends/mocks/simulated_test_backend.go on lines 304..315
      ethergo/backends/mocks/simulated_test_backend.go on lines 323..334
      ethergo/backends/mocks/simulated_test_backend.go on lines 360..371
      ethergo/backends/mocks/simulated_test_backend.go on lines 494..505
      ethergo/backends/mocks/simulated_test_backend.go on lines 884..895
      ethergo/backends/mocks/simulated_test_backend.go on lines 898..909
      ethergo/chain/client/mocks/metered_evm_client.go on lines 29..40
      ethergo/chain/client/mocks/metered_evm_client.go on lines 268..279
      ethergo/chain/client/mocks/metered_evm_client.go on lines 573..584
      ethergo/chain/mocks/chain.go on lines 37..48
      ethergo/chain/mocks/chain.go on lines 255..266
      ethergo/chain/mocks/chain.go on lines 269..280
      ethergo/chain/mocks/chain.go on lines 306..317
      ethergo/chain/mocks/chain.go on lines 435..446
      ethergo/chain/mocks/chain.go on lines 712..723
      ethergo/chain/mocks/chain.go on lines 726..737
      ethergo/contracts/mocks/contract_type.go on lines 33..44
      ethergo/contracts/mocks/contract_type.go on lines 47..58
      ethergo/contracts/mocks/contract_type.go on lines 61..72
      ethergo/contracts/mocks/deployed_contract.go on lines 117..128
      ethergo/listener/mocks/contract_listener.go on lines 37..48
      services/omnirpc/chainmanager/mocks/chain.go on lines 13..24
      services/omnirpc/chainmanager/mocks/chain.go on lines 27..38
      services/omnirpc/http/mocks/response.go on lines 29..40

      Duplicated Code

      Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

      Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

      When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

      Tuning

      This issue has a mass of 113.

      We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

      The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

      If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

      See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

      Refactorings

      Further Reading

      Similar blocks of code found in 27 locations. Consider refactoring.
      Open

      func (_m *MeteredEVMClient) AttemptReconnect() bool {
          ret := _m.Called()
      
          var r0 bool
          if rf, ok := ret.Get(0).(func() bool); ok {
      Severity: Major
      Found in ethergo/chain/client/mocks/metered_evm_client.go and 26 other locations - About 45 mins to fix
      ethergo/backends/mocks/simulated_test_backend.go on lines 51..62
      ethergo/backends/mocks/simulated_test_backend.go on lines 65..76
      ethergo/backends/mocks/simulated_test_backend.go on lines 304..315
      ethergo/backends/mocks/simulated_test_backend.go on lines 323..334
      ethergo/backends/mocks/simulated_test_backend.go on lines 360..371
      ethergo/backends/mocks/simulated_test_backend.go on lines 494..505
      ethergo/backends/mocks/simulated_test_backend.go on lines 884..895
      ethergo/backends/mocks/simulated_test_backend.go on lines 898..909
      ethergo/chain/client/mocks/metered_evm_client.go on lines 231..242
      ethergo/chain/client/mocks/metered_evm_client.go on lines 268..279
      ethergo/chain/client/mocks/metered_evm_client.go on lines 573..584
      ethergo/chain/mocks/chain.go on lines 37..48
      ethergo/chain/mocks/chain.go on lines 255..266
      ethergo/chain/mocks/chain.go on lines 269..280
      ethergo/chain/mocks/chain.go on lines 306..317
      ethergo/chain/mocks/chain.go on lines 435..446
      ethergo/chain/mocks/chain.go on lines 712..723
      ethergo/chain/mocks/chain.go on lines 726..737
      ethergo/contracts/mocks/contract_type.go on lines 33..44
      ethergo/contracts/mocks/contract_type.go on lines 47..58
      ethergo/contracts/mocks/contract_type.go on lines 61..72
      ethergo/contracts/mocks/deployed_contract.go on lines 117..128
      ethergo/listener/mocks/contract_listener.go on lines 37..48
      services/omnirpc/chainmanager/mocks/chain.go on lines 13..24
      services/omnirpc/chainmanager/mocks/chain.go on lines 27..38
      services/omnirpc/http/mocks/response.go on lines 29..40

      Duplicated Code

      Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

      Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

      When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

      Tuning

      This issue has a mass of 113.

      We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

      The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

      If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

      See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

      Refactorings

      Further Reading

      Similar blocks of code found in 27 locations. Consider refactoring.
      Open

      func (_m *MeteredEVMClient) RequestCount() int64 {
          ret := _m.Called()
      
          var r0 int64
          if rf, ok := ret.Get(0).(func() int64); ok {
      Severity: Major
      Found in ethergo/chain/client/mocks/metered_evm_client.go and 26 other locations - About 45 mins to fix
      ethergo/backends/mocks/simulated_test_backend.go on lines 51..62
      ethergo/backends/mocks/simulated_test_backend.go on lines 65..76
      ethergo/backends/mocks/simulated_test_backend.go on lines 304..315
      ethergo/backends/mocks/simulated_test_backend.go on lines 323..334
      ethergo/backends/mocks/simulated_test_backend.go on lines 360..371
      ethergo/backends/mocks/simulated_test_backend.go on lines 494..505
      ethergo/backends/mocks/simulated_test_backend.go on lines 884..895
      ethergo/backends/mocks/simulated_test_backend.go on lines 898..909
      ethergo/chain/client/mocks/metered_evm_client.go on lines 29..40
      ethergo/chain/client/mocks/metered_evm_client.go on lines 231..242
      ethergo/chain/client/mocks/metered_evm_client.go on lines 268..279
      ethergo/chain/mocks/chain.go on lines 37..48
      ethergo/chain/mocks/chain.go on lines 255..266
      ethergo/chain/mocks/chain.go on lines 269..280
      ethergo/chain/mocks/chain.go on lines 306..317
      ethergo/chain/mocks/chain.go on lines 435..446
      ethergo/chain/mocks/chain.go on lines 712..723
      ethergo/chain/mocks/chain.go on lines 726..737
      ethergo/contracts/mocks/contract_type.go on lines 33..44
      ethergo/contracts/mocks/contract_type.go on lines 47..58
      ethergo/contracts/mocks/contract_type.go on lines 61..72
      ethergo/contracts/mocks/deployed_contract.go on lines 117..128
      ethergo/listener/mocks/contract_listener.go on lines 37..48
      services/omnirpc/chainmanager/mocks/chain.go on lines 13..24
      services/omnirpc/chainmanager/mocks/chain.go on lines 27..38
      services/omnirpc/http/mocks/response.go on lines 29..40

      Duplicated Code

      Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

      Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

      When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

      Tuning

      This issue has a mass of 113.

      We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

      The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

      If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

      See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

      Refactorings

      Further Reading

      There are no issues that match your filters.

      Category
      Status