synapsecns/sanguine

View on GitHub
services/explorer/consumer/parser/cctpparser.go

Summary

Maintainability
C
7 hrs
Test Coverage

Function NewCCTPParser has 7 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

func NewCCTPParser(consumerDB db.ConsumerDB, cctpAddress common.Address, consumerFetcher fetcher.ScribeFetcher, cctpService fetcher.CCTPService, tokenDataService tokendata.Service, tokenPriceService tokenprice.Service, fromAPI bool) (*CCTPParser, error) {
Severity: Major
Found in services/explorer/consumer/parser/cctpparser.go - About 50 mins to fix

    Method CCTPParser.ParseLog has 8 return statements (exceeds 4 allowed).
    Open

    func (c *CCTPParser) ParseLog(log ethTypes.Log, chainID uint32) (*model.CCTPEvent, cctpTypes.EventLog, error) {
        logTopic := log.Topics[0]
        iFace, err := func(log ethTypes.Log) (cctpTypes.EventLog, error) {
            switch logTopic {
            case cctp.Topic(cctpTypes.CircleRequestSentEvent):
    Severity: Major
    Found in services/explorer/consumer/parser/cctpparser.go - About 50 mins to fix

      Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
      Open

      func (c *CCTPParser) storeBridgeEvent(ctx context.Context, bridgeEvent model.BridgeEvent) error {
          b := &backoff.Backoff{
              Factor: 2,
              Jitter: true,
              Min:    1 * time.Second,
      Severity: Major
      Found in services/explorer/consumer/parser/cctpparser.go and 1 other location - About 2 hrs to fix
      services/explorer/consumer/parser/rfqparser.go on lines 310..332

      Duplicated Code

      Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

      Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

      When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

      Tuning

      This issue has a mass of 209.

      We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

      The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

      If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

      See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

      Refactorings

      Further Reading

      Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
      Open

      func NewCCTPParser(consumerDB db.ConsumerDB, cctpAddress common.Address, consumerFetcher fetcher.ScribeFetcher, cctpService fetcher.CCTPService, tokenDataService tokendata.Service, tokenPriceService tokenprice.Service, fromAPI bool) (*CCTPParser, error) {
          filterer, err := cctp.NewSynapseCCTPFilterer(cctpAddress, nil)
          if err != nil {
              return nil, fmt.Errorf("could not create %T: %w", cctp.SynapseCCTPFilterer{}, err)
          }
      Severity: Major
      Found in services/explorer/consumer/parser/cctpparser.go and 1 other location - About 1 hr to fix
      services/explorer/consumer/parser/rfqparser.go on lines 48..54

      Duplicated Code

      Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

      Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

      When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

      Tuning

      This issue has a mass of 147.

      We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

      The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

      If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

      See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

      Refactorings

      Further Reading

      Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
      Open

      func (c *CCTPParser) Parse(ctx context.Context, log ethTypes.Log, chainID uint32) (interface{}, error) {
          cctpEvent, iFace, err := c.ParseLog(log, chainID)
          if err != nil {
              return nil, fmt.Errorf("could not parse cctp event: %w", err)
          }
      Severity: Major
      Found in services/explorer/consumer/parser/cctpparser.go and 1 other location - About 1 hr to fix
      services/explorer/consumer/parser/rfqparser.go on lines 163..173

      Duplicated Code

      Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

      Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

      When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

      Tuning

      This issue has a mass of 144.

      We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

      The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

      If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

      See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

      Refactorings

      Further Reading

      Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
      Open

      type CCTPParser struct {
          // consumerDB is the database to store parsed data in
          consumerDB db.ConsumerDB
          // Filterer is the message Filterer we use to parse events
          Filterer *cctp.SynapseCCTPFilterer
      Severity: Minor
      Found in services/explorer/consumer/parser/cctpparser.go and 1 other location - About 45 mins to fix
      services/explorer/consumer/parser/rfqparser.go on lines 28..45

      Duplicated Code

      Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

      Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

      When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

      Tuning

      This issue has a mass of 116.

      We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

      The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

      If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

      See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

      Refactorings

      Further Reading

      There are no issues that match your filters.

      Category
      Status