tctree333/Bird-ID

View on GitHub
bot/functions.py

Summary

Maintainability
D
2 days
Test Coverage
F
22%

Consider possible security implications associated with pickle module.
Open

import pickle
Severity: Info
Found in bot/functions.py by bandit

Standard pseudo-random generators are not suitable for security/cryptographic purposes.
Open

        path = f"bot/media/images/drone/{images[random.randint(0,len(images)-1)]}"
Severity: Info
Found in bot/functions.py by bandit

Standard pseudo-random generators are not suitable for security/cryptographic purposes.
Open

        if random.randint(0, 1) == 1:
Severity: Info
Found in bot/functions.py by bandit

Standard pseudo-random generators are not suitable for security/cryptographic purposes.
Open

            _cache.pop(random.choice((*_cache, object())), 0)
Severity: Info
Found in bot/functions.py by bandit

Pickle and modules that wrap it can be unsafe when used to deserialize untrusted data, possible security issue.
Open

            return pickle.loads(data)
Severity: Minor
Found in bot/functions.py by bandit

The pyCrypto library and its module ChaCha20 are no longer actively maintained and have been deprecated. Consider using pyca/cryptography library.
Open

from Crypto.Cipher import ChaCha20
Severity: Major
Found in bot/functions.py by bandit

Use of insecure MD2, MD4, MD5, or SHA1 hash function.
Open

            return hashlib.sha1(str(item).encode()).hexdigest()
Severity: Minor
Found in bot/functions.py by bandit

File functions.py has 745 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

# functions.py | function definitions
# Copyright (C) 2019-2021  EraserBird, person_v1.32, hmmm

# This program is free software: you can redistribute it and/or modify
# it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
Severity: Major
Found in bot/functions.py - About 1 day to fix

    Cyclomatic complexity is too high in function handle_error. (35)
    Open

    async def handle_error(ctx, error):
        """Function for comprehensive error handling."""
        if isinstance(error, commands.CommandOnCooldown):  # send cooldown
            await ctx.send(
                (
    Severity: Minor
    Found in bot/functions.py by radon

    Cyclomatic Complexity

    Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

    Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

    Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
    if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
    elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
    else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
    for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
    while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
    except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
    finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
    with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
    assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
    Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
    Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

    Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

    Function cache has a Cognitive Complexity of 26 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

    def cache(pre=None, local=True):
        """Cache decorator based on functools.lru_cache.
    
        This is not a very good cache, but it "works" for our
        purposes.
    Severity: Minor
    Found in bot/functions.py - About 3 hrs to fix

    Cognitive Complexity

    Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

    A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

    • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
    • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
    • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

    Further reading

    Cyclomatic complexity is too high in function build_id_list. (17)
    Open

    def build_id_list(
        user_id: str = None,
        taxon: Union[list, str] = None,
        state: Union[list, str] = None,
        media_type: MediaType = MediaType.IMAGE,
    Severity: Minor
    Found in bot/functions.py by radon

    Cyclomatic Complexity

    Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

    Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

    Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
    if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
    elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
    else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
    for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
    while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
    except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
    finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
    with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
    assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
    Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
    Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

    Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

    Cyclomatic complexity is too high in function drone_attack. (14)
    Open

    async def drone_attack(ctx):
        logger.info(f"holiday check: invoked command: {str(ctx.command)}")
    
        def video_embed():
            if random.randint(0, 1) == 1:
    Severity: Minor
    Found in bot/functions.py by radon

    Cyclomatic Complexity

    Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

    Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

    Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
    if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
    elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
    else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
    for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
    while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
    except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
    finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
    with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
    assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
    Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
    Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

    Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

    Cyclomatic complexity is too high in function send_leaderboard. (11)
    Open

    async def send_leaderboard(
        ctx, title, page, database_key=None, data=None, items_per_page=10
    ):
        logger.info("building/sending leaderboard")
    
    
    Severity: Minor
    Found in bot/functions.py by radon

    Cyclomatic Complexity

    Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

    Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

    Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
    if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
    elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
    else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
    for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
    while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
    except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
    finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
    with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
    assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
    Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
    Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

    Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

    Cyclomatic complexity is too high in function fetch_get_user. (10)
    Open

    async def fetch_get_user(user_id: int, ctx=None, bot=None, member: bool = False):
        if (ctx is None and bot is None) or (ctx is not None and bot is not None):
            raise ValueError("Only one of ctx or bot must be passed")
        if ctx:
            bot = ctx.bot
    Severity: Minor
    Found in bot/functions.py by radon

    Cyclomatic Complexity

    Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

    Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

    Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
    if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
    elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
    else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
    for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
    while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
    except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
    finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
    with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
    assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
    Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
    Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

    Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

    Cyclomatic complexity is too high in method __call__. (9)
    Open

        def __call__(self, ctx: commands.Context):
            if (
                ctx.command.name
                in (
                    "bird",
    Severity: Minor
    Found in bot/functions.py by radon

    Cyclomatic Complexity

    Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

    Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

    Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
    if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
    elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
    else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
    for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
    while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
    except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
    finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
    with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
    assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
    Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
    Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

    Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

    Cyclomatic complexity is too high in function backup_all. (6)
    Open

    def backup_all():
        """Backs up the database to a file.
    
        This function serializes all data in the REDIS database
        into a file in the `backups` directory.
    Severity: Minor
    Found in bot/functions.py by radon

    Cyclomatic Complexity

    Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

    Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

    Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
    if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
    elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
    else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
    for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
    while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
    except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
    finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
    with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
    assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
    Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
    Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

    Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

    Function build_id_list has a Cognitive Complexity of 14 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

    def build_id_list(
        user_id: str = None,
        taxon: Union[list, str] = None,
        state: Union[list, str] = None,
        media_type: MediaType = MediaType.IMAGE,
    Severity: Minor
    Found in bot/functions.py - About 1 hr to fix

    Cognitive Complexity

    Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

    A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

    • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
    • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
    • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

    Further reading

    Function __call__ has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

        def __call__(self, ctx: commands.Context):
            if (
                ctx.command.name
                in (
                    "bird",
    Severity: Minor
    Found in bot/functions.py - About 25 mins to fix

    Cognitive Complexity

    Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

    A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

    • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
    • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
    • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

    Further reading

    There are no issues that match your filters.

    Category
    Status