File train_utils.py has 492 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
# Copyright 2024 The TensorFlow Authors. All Rights Reserved.
#
# Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
# you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
# You may obtain a copy of the License atFunction try_count_flops has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def try_count_flops(model: Union[tf.Module, tf_keras.Model],
inputs_kwargs: Optional[Dict[str, Any]] = None,
output_path: Optional[str] = None):
"""Counts and returns model FLOPs.
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function try_count_params has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def try_count_params(
model: Union[tf.Module, tf_keras.Model],
trainable_only: bool = False):
"""Count the number of parameters if model is possible.
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function create_trainer has 6 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def create_trainer(params: config_definitions.ExperimentConfig,Function _einsum_flops has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def _einsum_flops(graph, node):
"""Calculates the compute resources needed for Einsum."""
assert len(node.input) == 2
x_shape = tf.compat.v1.graph_util.tensor_shape_from_node_def_name(
graph, node.input[0])- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function create_optimizer has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def create_optimizer(task: base_task.Task,
params: config_definitions.ExperimentConfig
) -> tf_keras.optimizers.Optimizer:
"""A create optimizer util to be backward compatability with new args."""
if 'dp_config' in inspect.signature(task.create_optimizer).parameters:- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function _new_metric_is_better has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def _new_metric_is_better(self, old_logs, new_logs):
"""Check if the metric in new_logs is better than the metric in old_logs."""
old_value = float(
orbit.utils.get_value(
get_leaf_nested_dict(old_logs, self._metric_name)))- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"