testmycode/tmc-server

View on GitHub
app/controllers/api/v8/users_controller.rb

Summary

Maintainability
C
7 hrs
Test Coverage

Method show has 28 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

      def show
        unauthorize_guest! if current_user.guest?
        user = current_user
        user = User.find_by!(id: params[:id]) unless params[:id] == 'current'
        authorize! :read, user
Severity: Minor
Found in app/controllers/api/v8/users_controller.rb - About 1 hr to fix

    Method update has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

          def update
            unauthorize_guest! if current_user.guest?
    
            User.transaction do
              @user = current_user
    Severity: Minor
    Found in app/controllers/api/v8/users_controller.rb - About 1 hr to fix

    Cognitive Complexity

    Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

    A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

    • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
    • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
    • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

    Further reading

    Method create has 27 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

          def create
            authorize! :create, User
    
            @user = User.new
    
    
    Severity: Minor
    Found in app/controllers/api/v8/users_controller.rb - About 1 hr to fix

      Method maybe_update_password has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
      Open

              def maybe_update_password
                if params[:old_password].present? && params[:password].present?
                  if !@user.has_password?(params[:old_password])
                    @user.errors.add(:old_password, 'incorrect')
                  elsif params[:password] != params[:password_repeat]
      Severity: Minor
      Found in app/controllers/api/v8/users_controller.rb - About 45 mins to fix

      Cognitive Complexity

      Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

      A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

      • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
      • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
      • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

      Further reading

      Method set_extra_data has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
      Open

              def set_extra_data(eager_save = false)
                return unless params['user']
                extra_fields = params['user']['extra_fields']
                return if extra_fields.nil?
                namespace = extra_fields['namespace']
      Severity: Minor
      Found in app/controllers/api/v8/users_controller.rb - About 35 mins to fix

      Cognitive Complexity

      Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

      A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

      • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
      • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
      • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

      Further reading

      Method create has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
      Open

            def create
              authorize! :create, User
      
              @user = User.new
      
      
      Severity: Minor
      Found in app/controllers/api/v8/users_controller.rb - About 25 mins to fix

      Cognitive Complexity

      Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

      A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

      • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
      • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
      • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

      Further reading

      Identical blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.
      Open

              def set_user_fields
                return if params[:user_field].nil?
                changes = {}
                UserField.all.select { |f| f.visible_to?(current_user) }.each do |field|
                  value_record = @user.field_value_record(field)
      Severity: Major
      Found in app/controllers/api/v8/users_controller.rb and 2 other locations - About 1 hr to fix
      app/controllers/settings_controller.rb on lines 107..117
      app/controllers/users_controller.rb on lines 200..210

      Duplicated Code

      Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

      Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

      When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

      Tuning

      This issue has a mass of 54.

      We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

      The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

      If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

      See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

      Refactorings

      Further Reading

      Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
      Open

              def set_password
                user_params = params[:user]
                if user_params[:password].blank?
                  @user.errors.add(:password, 'needed')
                elsif user_params[:password].length > 1000
      Severity: Minor
      Found in app/controllers/api/v8/users_controller.rb and 1 other location - About 55 mins to fix
      app/controllers/users_controller.rb on lines 168..178

      Duplicated Code

      Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

      Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

      When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

      Tuning

      This issue has a mass of 46.

      We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

      The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

      If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

      See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

      Refactorings

      Further Reading

      There are no issues that match your filters.

      Category
      Status