Showing 50 of 50 total issues
Class Proxmox
has 24 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
class Proxmox < ComputeResource
include ProxmoxVmHelper
include ProxmoxConnection
include ProxmoxVmNew
include ProxmoxVmCommands
Method setVmDetails
has a Cognitive Complexity of 17 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def setVmDetails
attrs = compute_resource.provided_attributes
result = true
attrs.each do |foreman_attr, fog_attr|
if foreman_attr == :mac
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method update_volume
has a Cognitive Complexity of 17 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def update_volume(vm, disk, volume_attributes)
id = disk.id
if volume_type?(volume_attributes, 'cdrom')
update_cdrom(vm, disk, volume_attributes)
elsif volume_type?(volume_attributes, 'hard_disk')
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method parse_server_cloudinit
has a Cognitive Complexity of 14 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def parse_server_cloudinit(args)
cloudinit_h = {}
cloudinit = args['cloudinit']
unless ['none'].include? cloudinit
volid = args['volid']
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method create_vm
has a Cognitive Complexity of 14 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def create_vm(args = {})
vmid = args[:vmid].to_i
type = args[:type]
node = client.nodes.get(args[:node_id])
vmid = node.servers.next_id.to_i if vmid < 1
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function updateOptions
has 34 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function updateOptions(options_path, start_options_id, end_options_id, start_second_options_id, end_second_options_id, option_id, node_id, second_id) {
var select_ids = selectIds(start_options_id, end_options_id);
var select_second_ids;
if ( start_second_options_id != undefined && end_second_options_id != undefined) {
Method host_interfaces_attrs
has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def host_interfaces_attrs(host)
host.interfaces.select(&:physical?).each.with_index.reduce({}) do |hash, (nic, index)|
set_nic_identifier(nic, index)
set_container_interface_name(host, nic, index) if container?(host)
ForemanFogProxmox::HashCollection.remove_empty_values(nic.compute_attributes)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
function toggleAccordion(selected){
['qemu', 'lxc'].forEach(function(type){
fieldsets(type).forEach(function(fieldsetId){
toggleConfigOptions(fieldsetId, selected, type);
});
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 59.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
function getIndex(item) {
var index_id = $(item).attr('id');
var pattern = /(host_compute_attributes_volumes_attributes_||compute_attribute_vm_attrs_volumes_attributes_)(\d+)[_](.*)/i;
pattern_a = pattern.exec(index_id);
var index = pattern_a[2];
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 59.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
function getIndex(item) {
var index_id = $(item).attr('id');
var pattern = /(host_compute_attributes_volumes_attributes_||compute_attribute_vm_attrs_volumes_attributes_)(\d+)[_](.*)/i;
pattern_a = pattern.exec(index_id);
var index = pattern_a[2];
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 59.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
function toggleVolumes(selected){
['qemu', 'lxc'].forEach(function(type){
volumes(type).forEach(function(volume_id){
toggleVolume(volume_id, selected, type);
});
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 59.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Method proxmox_cpus_map
has 29 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def proxmox_cpus_map
[OpenStruct.new(id: '486', name: '486'),
OpenStruct.new(id: 'athlon', name: 'athlon'),
OpenStruct.new(id: 'core2duo', name: 'core2duo'),
OpenStruct.new(id: 'coreduo', name: 'coreduo'),
Method password_proxmox_f
has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def password_proxmox_f(f, attr, options = {})
unset_button = options.delete(:unset)
value = f.object[attr] if options.delete(:keep_value)
password_field_tag(:fakepassword, value, :style => 'display: none', :autocomplete => 'new-password-fake') +
field(f, attr, options) do
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function updateOptions
has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function updateOptions(options_path, start_options_id, end_options_id, start_second_options_id, end_second_options_id, option_id, node_id, second_id) {
var select_ids = selectIds(start_options_id, end_options_id);
var select_second_ids;
if ( start_second_options_id != undefined && end_second_options_id != undefined) {
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method new_typed_vm
has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def new_typed_vm(new_attr, type)
convert_config_attributes(new_attr) if new_attr.key?(:config_attributes)
node_id = new_attr['node_id']
node = node_id ? client.nodes.get(node_id) : default_node
new_attr_type = new_attr['type']
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method add_or_delete_typed_interface
has 27 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def add_or_delete_typed_interface(interface_attributes, interfaces_to_delete, interfaces_to_add, type)
logger.debug("add_or_delete_typed_interface(#{type}): interface_attributes=#{interface_attributes}")
ForemanFogProxmox::HashCollection.remove_empty_values(interface_attributes)
if interface_attributes['compute_attributes']
ForemanFogProxmox::HashCollection.remove_empty_values(interface_attributes['compute_attributes'])
Function updateOptions
has 8 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function updateOptions(options_path, start_options_id, end_options_id, start_second_options_id, end_second_options_id, option_id, node_id, second_id) {
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
def proxmox_scsihw_map
[OpenStruct.new(id: 'lsi', name: 'lsi'),
OpenStruct.new(id: 'lsi53c810', name: 'lsi53c810'),
OpenStruct.new(id: 'megasas', name: 'megasas'),
OpenStruct.new(id: 'virtio-scsi-pci', name: 'virtio-scsi-pci'),
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 45.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Method parse_hard_disk_volume
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def parse_hard_disk_volume(args)
logger.debug(format(_('parse_hard_disk_volume(): args=%<args>s'), args: args))
disk = {}
disk[:id] = args['id'] if args.key?('id')
disk[:volid] = args['volid'] if args.key?('volid')
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
def proxmox_scsi_controllers_map
[OpenStruct.new(id: 'lsi', name: 'LSI 53C895A (Default)'),
OpenStruct.new(id: 'lsi53c810', name: 'LSI 53C810'),
OpenStruct.new(id: 'virtio-scsi-pci', name: 'VirtIO SCSI'),
OpenStruct.new(id: 'virtio-scsi-single', name: 'VirtIO SCSI Single'),
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 45.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76