tidalf/plugin.audio.qobuz

View on GitHub
resources/lib/qobuz/node/inode/main.py

Summary

Maintainability
D
2 days
Test Coverage

File main.py has 439 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

'''
    qobuz.node.inode.main
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

    :part_of: kodi-qobuz
Severity: Minor
Found in resources/lib/qobuz/node/inode/main.py - About 6 hrs to fix

    INode has 46 functions (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

    class INode(object):
        '''Our base node, every node must inherit or mimic is behaviour
    
            Calling build_down on a node start the build process
                - pre_build_down: Retrieve data (disk, internet...) and store
    Severity: Minor
    Found in resources/lib/qobuz/node/inode/main.py - About 6 hrs to fix

      Cyclomatic complexity is too high in method make_url. (15)
      Open

          def make_url(self, **ka):
              '''Generate URL to navigate between nodes
                  Nodes with custom parameters must override this method
                  @todo: Ugly need rewrite =]
              '''

      Cyclomatic Complexity

      Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

      Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

      Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
      if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
      elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
      else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
      for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
      while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
      except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
      finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
      with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
      assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
      Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
      Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

      Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

      Cyclomatic complexity is too high in method populating. (11)
      Open

          def populating(self, options=None):
              options = options if options is not None else helper.TreeTraverseOpts()
              data = {} if options.data is None else options.data
              if options.lvl != -1 and options.lvl < 1:
                  return False

      Cyclomatic Complexity

      Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

      Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

      Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
      if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
      elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
      else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
      for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
      while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
      except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
      finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
      with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
      assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
      Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
      Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

      Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

      Function make_url has a Cognitive Complexity of 16 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
      Open

          def make_url(self, **ka):
              '''Generate URL to navigate between nodes
                  Nodes with custom parameters must override this method
                  @todo: Ugly need rewrite =]
              '''
      Severity: Minor
      Found in resources/lib/qobuz/node/inode/main.py - About 2 hrs to fix

      Cognitive Complexity

      Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

      A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

      • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
      • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
      • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

      Further reading

      Cyclomatic complexity is too high in method get_image. (7)
      Open

          def get_image(self):
              if self.image:
                  return self.image
              if self.parent:
                  return self.parent.get_image()

      Cyclomatic Complexity

      Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

      Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

      Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
      if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
      elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
      else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
      for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
      while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
      except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
      finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
      with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
      assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
      Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
      Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

      Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

      Cyclomatic complexity is too high in method makeListItem. (7)
      Open

          def makeListItem(self, **ka):
              '''
                  Make Xbmc List Item
                  return  a xbml list item
                  Class can overload this method

      Cyclomatic Complexity

      Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

      Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

      Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
      if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
      elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
      else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
      for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
      while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
      except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
      finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
      with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
      assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
      Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
      Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

      Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

      Cyclomatic complexity is too high in method __getattr__. (7)
      Open

          def __getattr__(self, attr):
              if attr.startswith('get_') and hasattr(self, 'propsMap'):
                  key = attr[4:]
                  if key in self.propsMap:
                      prop = self.propsMap.get(key)

      Cyclomatic Complexity

      Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

      Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

      Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
      if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
      elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
      else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
      for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
      while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
      except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
      finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
      with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
      assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
      Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
      Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

      Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

      Function get_image_from_storage has a Cognitive Complexity of 15 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
      Open

          def get_image_from_storage(self):
              desired_size = config.app.registry.get('image_default_size',
                                                     default=None)
              images = []
              if self.nid is not None:
      Severity: Minor
      Found in resources/lib/qobuz/node/inode/main.py - About 1 hr to fix

      Cognitive Complexity

      Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

      A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

      • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
      • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
      • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

      Further reading

      Cyclomatic complexity is too high in method get_image_from_storage. (6)
      Open

          def get_image_from_storage(self):
              desired_size = config.app.registry.get('image_default_size',
                                                     default=None)
              images = []
              if self.nid is not None:

      Cyclomatic Complexity

      Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

      Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

      Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
      if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
      elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
      else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
      for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
      while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
      except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
      finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
      with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
      assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
      Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
      Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

      Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

      Function __getattr__ has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
      Open

          def __getattr__(self, attr):
              if attr.startswith('get_') and hasattr(self, 'propsMap'):
                  key = attr[4:]
                  if key in self.propsMap:
                      prop = self.propsMap.get(key)
      Severity: Minor
      Found in resources/lib/qobuz/node/inode/main.py - About 1 hr to fix

      Cognitive Complexity

      Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

      A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

      • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
      • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
      • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

      Further reading

      Function populating has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
      Open

          def populating(self, options=None):
              options = options if options is not None else helper.TreeTraverseOpts()
              data = {} if options.data is None else options.data
              if options.lvl != -1 and options.lvl < 1:
                  return False
      Severity: Minor
      Found in resources/lib/qobuz/node/inode/main.py - About 1 hr to fix

      Cognitive Complexity

      Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

      A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

      • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
      • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
      • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

      Further reading

      Function __init__ has 26 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
      Open

          def __init__(self, parent=None, parameters=None, data=None):
              '''Constructor
              @param parent=None: Parent node if not None
              @param parameters={}: dictionary
              '''
      Severity: Minor
      Found in resources/lib/qobuz/node/inode/main.py - About 1 hr to fix

        Function get_image has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
        Open

            def get_image(self):
                if self.image:
                    return self.image
                if self.parent:
                    return self.parent.get_image()
        Severity: Minor
        Found in resources/lib/qobuz/node/inode/main.py - About 45 mins to fix

        Cognitive Complexity

        Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

        A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

        • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
        • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
        • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

        Further reading

        Function render_nodes has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.
        Open

            def render_nodes(cls,
        Severity: Minor
        Found in resources/lib/qobuz/node/inode/main.py - About 35 mins to fix

          Refactor this function to reduce its Cognitive Complexity from 18 to the 15 allowed.
          Open

              def make_url(self, **ka):

          Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how hard the control flow of a function is to understand. Functions with high Cognitive Complexity will be difficult to maintain.

          See

          Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
          Open

                  if 'asLocalUrl' in ka and not ka['asLocalUrl']:
                      del ka['asLocalUrl']
          Severity: Minor
          Found in resources/lib/qobuz/node/inode/main.py and 1 other location - About 40 mins to fix
          resources/lib/qobuz/node/inode/main.py on lines 296..297

          Duplicated Code

          Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

          Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

          When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

          Tuning

          This issue has a mass of 34.

          We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

          The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

          If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

          See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

          Refactorings

          Further Reading

          Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
          Open

                  if 'asLocalUrl' in ka and not ka['asLocalUrl']:
                      del ka['asLocalUrl']
          Severity: Minor
          Found in resources/lib/qobuz/node/inode/main.py and 1 other location - About 40 mins to fix
          resources/lib/qobuz/node/inode/main.py on lines 258..259

          Duplicated Code

          Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

          Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

          When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

          Tuning

          This issue has a mass of 34.

          We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

          The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

          If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

          See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

          Refactorings

          Further Reading

          Line too long (80 > 79 characters)
          Open

                  @param quote=False: use urllib.quote_plus against return value when True
          Severity: Minor
          Found in resources/lib/qobuz/node/inode/main.py by pep8

          Limit all lines to a maximum of 79 characters.

          There are still many devices around that are limited to 80 character
          lines; plus, limiting windows to 80 characters makes it possible to
          have several windows side-by-side.  The default wrapping on such
          devices looks ugly.  Therefore, please limit all lines to a maximum
          of 79 characters. For flowing long blocks of text (docstrings or
          comments), limiting the length to 72 characters is recommended.
          
          Reports error E501.

          Line too long (80 > 79 characters)
          Open

                      node.label = u'{label} [{next_offset} / {pagination_total}]'.format(
          Severity: Minor
          Found in resources/lib/qobuz/node/inode/main.py by pep8

          Limit all lines to a maximum of 79 characters.

          There are still many devices around that are limited to 80 character
          lines; plus, limiting windows to 80 characters makes it possible to
          have several windows side-by-side.  The default wrapping on such
          devices looks ugly.  Therefore, please limit all lines to a maximum
          of 79 characters. For flowing long blocks of text (docstrings or
          comments), limiting the length to 72 characters is recommended.
          
          Reports error E501.

          There are no issues that match your filters.

          Category
          Status