tidalf/plugin.audio.qobuz

View on GitHub
resources/lib/qobuz/node/playlist/main.py

Summary

Maintainability
F
4 days
Test Coverage

File main.py has 419 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

'''
    qobuz.node.playlist
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

    :part_of: kodi-qobuz
Severity: Minor
Found in resources/lib/qobuz/node/playlist/main.py - About 6 hrs to fix

    Node_playlist has 33 functions (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

    class Node_playlist(INode):
        def __init__(self, parent=None, parameters=None, data=None):
            parameters = {} if parameters is None else parameters
            super(Node_playlist, self).__init__(
                parent=parent, parameters=parameters, data=data)
    Severity: Minor
    Found in resources/lib/qobuz/node/playlist/main.py - About 4 hrs to fix

      Cyclomatic complexity is too high in method gui_add_as_new. (10)
      Open

          def gui_add_as_new(self, _=None):
              nodes = []
              qnt = int(self.get_parameter('qnt'))
              qid = self.get_parameter('qid')
              name = self.get_parameter('query', to='unquote', default=None)

      Cyclomatic Complexity

      Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

      Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

      Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
      if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
      elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
      else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
      for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
      while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
      except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
      finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
      with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
      assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
      Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
      Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

      Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

      Cyclomatic complexity is too high in method _add_tracks. (8)
      Open

          @classmethod
          def _add_tracks(cls, playlist_id, nodes):
              if len(nodes) < 1:
                  logger.warn('Empty list...')
                  return False

      Cyclomatic Complexity

      Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

      Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

      Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
      if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
      elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
      else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
      for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
      while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
      except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
      finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
      with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
      assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
      Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
      Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

      Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

      Cyclomatic complexity is too high in method gui_rename. (8)
      Open

          def gui_rename(self, playlist_id=None):
              if not playlist_id:
                  playlist_id = self.nid
              if not playlist_id:
                  logger.warn('Can\'t rename playlist without id')

      Cyclomatic Complexity

      Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

      Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

      Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
      if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
      elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
      else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
      for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
      while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
      except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
      finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
      with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
      assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
      Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
      Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

      Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

      Cyclomatic complexity is too high in method gui_remove. (7)
      Open

          def gui_remove(self, playlist_id=None):
              playlist_id = self._get_playlist_id(playlist_id=playlist_id)
              if not playlist_id:
                  notify_error(dialogHeading,
                               'Invalid playlist %s' % (str(playlist_id)))

      Cyclomatic Complexity

      Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

      Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

      Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
      if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
      elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
      else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
      for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
      while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
      except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
      finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
      with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
      assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
      Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
      Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

      Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

      Cyclomatic complexity is too high in method makeListItem. (6)
      Open

          def makeListItem(self, **ka):
              replaceItems = ka['replaceItems'] if 'replaceItems' in ka else False
              privacy_color = theme.get('item/public/color') if self.get_property(
                  'is_public', to='bool') else theme.get('item/private/color')
              tag = color(privacy_color, self.get_tag())

      Cyclomatic Complexity

      Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

      Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

      Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
      if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
      elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
      else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
      for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
      while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
      except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
      finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
      with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
      assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
      Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
      Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

      Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

      Cyclomatic complexity is too high in method gui_add_to_current. (6)
      Open

          def gui_add_to_current(self):
              cid = self.get_current_playlist()
              qnt = int(self.get_parameter('qnt'))
              qid = self.get_parameter('qid')
              nodes = []

      Cyclomatic Complexity

      Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

      Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

      Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
      if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
      elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
      else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
      for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
      while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
      except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
      finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
      with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
      assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
      Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
      Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

      Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

      Function _add_tracks has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
      Open

          def _add_tracks(cls, playlist_id, nodes):
              if len(nodes) < 1:
                  logger.warn('Empty list...')
                  return False
              step = 50
      Severity: Minor
      Found in resources/lib/qobuz/node/playlist/main.py - About 1 hr to fix

      Cognitive Complexity

      Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

      A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

      • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
      • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
      • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

      Further reading

      Function gui_add_as_new has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
      Open

          def gui_add_as_new(self, _=None):
              nodes = []
              qnt = int(self.get_parameter('qnt'))
              qid = self.get_parameter('qid')
              name = self.get_parameter('query', to='unquote', default=None)
      Severity: Minor
      Found in resources/lib/qobuz/node/playlist/main.py - About 1 hr to fix

      Cognitive Complexity

      Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

      A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

      • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
      • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
      • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

      Further reading

      Function gui_remove has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
      Open

          def gui_remove(self, playlist_id=None):
              playlist_id = self._get_playlist_id(playlist_id=playlist_id)
              if not playlist_id:
                  notify_error(dialogHeading,
                               'Invalid playlist %s' % (str(playlist_id)))
      Severity: Minor
      Found in resources/lib/qobuz/node/playlist/main.py - About 35 mins to fix

      Cognitive Complexity

      Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

      A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

      • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
      • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
      • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

      Further reading

      Function gui_rename has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
      Open

          def gui_rename(self, playlist_id=None):
              if not playlist_id:
                  playlist_id = self.nid
              if not playlist_id:
                  logger.warn('Can\'t rename playlist without id')
      Severity: Minor
      Found in resources/lib/qobuz/node/playlist/main.py - About 35 mins to fix

      Cognitive Complexity

      Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

      A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

      • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
      • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
      • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

      Further reading

      Avoid too many return statements within this function.
      Open

              return True
      Severity: Major
      Found in resources/lib/qobuz/node/playlist/main.py - About 30 mins to fix

        Avoid too many return statements within this function.
        Open

                return True
        Severity: Major
        Found in resources/lib/qobuz/node/playlist/main.py - About 30 mins to fix

          Avoid too many return statements within this function.
          Open

                  return True
          Severity: Major
          Found in resources/lib/qobuz/node/playlist/main.py - About 30 mins to fix

            Avoid too many return statements within this function.
            Open

                        return False
            Severity: Major
            Found in resources/lib/qobuz/node/playlist/main.py - About 30 mins to fix

              Avoid too many return statements within this function.
              Open

                          return False
              Severity: Major
              Found in resources/lib/qobuz/node/playlist/main.py - About 30 mins to fix

                Avoid too many return statements within this function.
                Open

                            return True
                Severity: Major
                Found in resources/lib/qobuz/node/playlist/main.py - About 30 mins to fix

                  Function gui_create has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
                  Open

                      def gui_create(self):
                          query = self.get_parameter('query', to='unquote')
                          if not query:
                              query = ask('', lang(30182))
                              if query is None:
                  Severity: Minor
                  Found in resources/lib/qobuz/node/playlist/main.py - About 25 mins to fix

                  Cognitive Complexity

                  Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

                  A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

                  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
                  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
                  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

                  Further reading

                  Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
                  Open

                          if qnt & Flag.TRACK == Flag.TRACK:
                              node = getNode(qnt, parameters={'nid': qid})
                              node.data = node.fetch()
                              nodes.append(node)
                          else:
                  Severity: Major
                  Found in resources/lib/qobuz/node/playlist/main.py and 1 other location - About 6 hrs to fix
                  resources/lib/qobuz/node/playlist/main.py on lines 233..245

                  Duplicated Code

                  Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

                  Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

                  When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

                  Tuning

                  This issue has a mass of 98.

                  We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

                  The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

                  If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

                  See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

                  Refactorings

                  Further Reading

                  Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
                  Open

                          if qnt & Flag.TRACK == Flag.TRACK:
                              node = getNode(qnt, parameters={'nid': qid})
                              node.data = node.fetch()
                              nodes.append(node)
                          else:
                  Severity: Major
                  Found in resources/lib/qobuz/node/playlist/main.py and 1 other location - About 6 hrs to fix
                  resources/lib/qobuz/node/playlist/main.py on lines 294..306

                  Duplicated Code

                  Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

                  Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

                  When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

                  Tuning

                  This issue has a mass of 98.

                  We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

                  The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

                  If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

                  See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

                  Refactorings

                  Further Reading

                  Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
                  Open

                          for track in self.get_property(self._items_path):
                              node = getNode(Flag.TRACK, data=track)
                              if not node.get_displayable():
                                  logger.warn(u'Track not displayable: %s (%s)',
                                              node.get_label().encode('ascii', errors='ignore'),
                  Severity: Major
                  Found in resources/lib/qobuz/node/playlist/main.py and 1 other location - About 3 hrs to fix
                  resources/lib/qobuz/node/favorite.py on lines 95..104

                  Duplicated Code

                  Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

                  Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

                  When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

                  Tuning

                  This issue has a mass of 65.

                  We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

                  The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

                  If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

                  See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

                  Refactorings

                  Further Reading

                  Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
                  Open

                      def attach_context_menu(self, item, menu):
                          attach_context_menu(self, item, menu)
                          super(Node_playlist, self).attach_context_menu(item, menu)
                  Severity: Minor
                  Found in resources/lib/qobuz/node/playlist/main.py and 1 other location - About 30 mins to fix
                  resources/lib/qobuz/node/track/main.py on lines 294..296

                  Duplicated Code

                  Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

                  Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

                  When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

                  Tuning

                  This issue has a mass of 32.

                  We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

                  The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

                  If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

                  See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

                  Refactorings

                  Further Reading

                  There are no issues that match your filters.

                  Category
                  Status