Sign upLogin

timberio/timber-ruby

View on GitHub
Star

Showing 16 of 16 total issues

Method deliver_requests has a Cognitive Complexity of 19 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

        def deliver_requests(conn)
          num_reqs = 0

          while num_reqs < @requests_per_conn
            if @request_queue.size > 0
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/timber/log_devices/http.rb - About 2 hrs to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method deliver_requests has 37 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

        def deliver_requests(conn)
          num_reqs = 0

          while num_reqs < @requests_per_conn
            if @request_queue.size > 0
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/timber/log_devices/http.rb - About 1 hr to fix

    Method initialize has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

        def initialize(*io_devices_and_loggers)
      if io_devices_and_loggers.size == 0
        raise ArgumentError.new("At least one IO device or Logger must be provided when " +
          "instantiating a Timber::Logger. Ex: Timber::Logger.new(STDOUT).")
      end
    Severity: Minor
    Found in lib/timber/logger.rb - About 1 hr to fix

    Cognitive Complexity

    Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

    A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

    • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
    • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
    • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

    Further reading

    Method integrate! has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

          def integrate!(*args)
        if !enabled?
          Config.instance.debug_logger.debug("#{name} integration disabled, skipping") if Config.instance.debug_logger
          return false
        end
    Severity: Minor
    Found in lib/timber/integrator.rb - About 1 hr to fix

    Cognitive Complexity

    Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

    A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

    • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
    • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
    • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

    Further reading

    Method initialize has 27 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

        def initialize(*io_devices_and_loggers)
      if io_devices_and_loggers.size == 0
        raise ArgumentError.new("At least one IO device or Logger must be provided when " +
          "instantiating a Timber::Logger. Ex: Timber::Logger.new(STDOUT).")
      end
    Severity: Minor
    Found in lib/timber/logger.rb - About 1 hr to fix

      Method to_hash has 26 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
      Open

          def to_hash(options = {})
      options ||= {}
      hash = {
        :level => level,
        :dt => formatted_dt,
      Severity: Minor
      Found in lib/timber/log_entry.rb - About 1 hr to fix

        Method to_hash has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
        Open

            def to_hash(options = {})
      options ||= {}
      hash = {
        :level => level,
        :dt => formatted_dt,
        Severity: Minor
        Found in lib/timber/log_entry.rb - About 55 mins to fix

        Cognitive Complexity

        Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

        A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

        • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
        • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
        • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

        Further reading

        Method initialize has 7 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.
        Open

            def initialize(level, time, progname, message, context_snapshot, event, options = {})
        Severity: Major
        Found in lib/timber/log_entry.rb - About 50 mins to fix

          Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
          Open

          module Timber
  module Events
    # @private
    class SQLQuery < Timber::Event
      attr_reader :sql, :duration_ms, :message
          Severity: Minor
          Found in lib/timber/events/sql_query.rb and 1 other location - About 45 mins to fix
          lib/timber/events/template_render.rb on lines 3..21

          Duplicated Code

          Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

          Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

          When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

          Tuning

          This issue has a mass of 41.

          We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

          The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

          If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

          See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

          Refactorings

          Further Reading

          Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
          Open

          module Timber
  module Events
    # @private
    class TemplateRender < Timber::Event
      attr_reader :message, :name, :duration_ms
          Severity: Minor
          Found in lib/timber/events/template_render.rb and 1 other location - About 45 mins to fix
          lib/timber/events/sql_query.rb on lines 4..22

          Duplicated Code

          Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

          Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

          When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

          Tuning

          This issue has a mass of 41.

          We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

          The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

          If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

          See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

          Refactorings

          Further Reading

          Method build_log_entry has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
          Open

                  def build_log_entry(severity, time, progname, logged_obj)
          context_snapshot = CurrentContext.instance.snapshot
          level = SEVERITY_MAP.fetch(severity)
          tags = extract_active_support_tagged_logging_tags
          Severity: Minor
          Found in lib/timber/logger.rb - About 35 mins to fix

          Cognitive Complexity

          Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

          A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

          • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
          • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
          • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

          Further reading

          Method ensure_flush_threads_are_started has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
          Open

                  def ensure_flush_threads_are_started
          if @flush_continuously
            if @request_outlet_thread.nil? || !@request_outlet_thread.alive?
              @request_outlet_thread = Thread.new { request_outlet }
            end
          Severity: Minor
          Found in lib/timber/log_devices/http.rb - About 25 mins to fix

          Cognitive Complexity

          Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

          A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

          • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
          • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
          • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

          Further reading

          Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
          Open

          module Timber
  module Contexts
    # @private
    class Session < Context
      attr_reader :id
          Severity: Minor
          Found in lib/timber/contexts/session.rb and 1 other location - About 20 mins to fix
          lib/timber/contexts/runtime.rb on lines 3..20

          Duplicated Code

          Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

          Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

          When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

          Tuning

          This issue has a mass of 28.

          We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

          The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

          If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

          See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

          Refactorings

          Further Reading

          Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
          Open

          module Timber
  module Contexts
    # @private
    class Runtime < Context
      attr_reader :thread_id
          Severity: Minor
          Found in lib/timber/contexts/runtime.rb and 1 other location - About 20 mins to fix
          lib/timber/contexts/session.rb on lines 4..21

          Duplicated Code

          Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

          Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

          When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

          Tuning

          This issue has a mass of 28.

          We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

          The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

          If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

          See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

          Refactorings

          Further Reading

          Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
          Open

                def to_hash
        @to_hash ||= {
          user: Util::NonNilHashBuilder.build do |h|
            h.add(:id, id)
            h.add(:name, name)
          Severity: Minor
          Found in lib/timber/contexts/user.rb and 1 other location - About 15 mins to fix
          lib/timber/contexts/release.rb on lines 41..49

          Duplicated Code

          Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

          Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

          When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

          Tuning

          This issue has a mass of 25.

          We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

          The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

          If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

          See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

          Refactorings

          Further Reading

          Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
          Open

                def to_hash
        @to_hash ||= {
          release: Util::NonNilHashBuilder.build do |h|
            h.add(:commit_hash, commit_hash)
            h.add(:created_at, created_at)
          Severity: Minor
          Found in lib/timber/contexts/release.rb and 1 other location - About 15 mins to fix
          lib/timber/contexts/user.rb on lines 17..25

          Duplicated Code

          Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

          Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

          When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

          Tuning

          This issue has a mass of 25.

          We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

          The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

          If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

          See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

          Refactorings

          Further Reading

          Severity
          Category
          Status
          Source
          Language