File MarketoRestClient.java
has 531 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
package org.embulk.input.marketo.rest;
import com.fasterxml.jackson.core.JsonProcessingException;
import com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.JsonNode;
import com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.node.ObjectNode;
MarketoRestClient
has 44 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public class MarketoRestClient extends MarketoBaseRestClient
{
private static final String BATCH_SIZE = "batchSize";
private static final String NEXT_PAGE_TOKEN = "nextPageToken";
Method getCustomObjectRecordWithPagination
has a Cognitive Complexity of 23 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private <T> RecordPagingIterable<T> getCustomObjectRecordWithPagination(final String endPoint, final String customObjectFilterType, final String customObjectFields, final Integer fromValue, final Integer toValue, final Class<T> recordClass)
{
return new RecordPagingIterable<>(new RecordPagingIterable.PagingFunction<RecordPagingIterable.OffsetWithTokenPage<T>>()
{
@Override
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method getCustomObjectRecordWithPagination
has 56 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private <T> RecordPagingIterable<T> getCustomObjectRecordWithPagination(final String endPoint, final String customObjectFilterType, final String customObjectFields, final Integer fromValue, final Integer toValue, final Class<T> recordClass)
{
return new RecordPagingIterable<>(new RecordPagingIterable.PagingFunction<RecordPagingIterable.OffsetWithTokenPage<T>>()
{
@Override
Method getOffsetPage
has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private RecordPagingIterable.OffsetWithTokenPage<T> getOffsetPage(int offset, String nextPageToken)
{
boolean isMoreResult = true;
boolean isEndOffset = false;
int nextOffset = offset + MAX_REQUEST_SIZE;
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method getRecordWithTokenPagination
has 35 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private <T> RecordPagingIterable<T> getRecordWithTokenPagination(final String endPoint, final Multimap<String, String> parameters, final Class<T> recordClass)
{
return new RecordPagingIterable<>(new RecordPagingIterable.PagingFunction<RecordPagingIterable.TokenPage<T>>()
{
@Override
Method waitExportJobComplete
has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private ObjectNode waitExportJobComplete(MarketoRESTEndpoint marketoRESTEndpoint, String exportId, int pollingInterval, int waitTimeout) throws InterruptedException
{
long waitTime = 0;
long waitTimeoutMs = waitTimeout * 1000L;
long now = System.currentTimeMillis();
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method getRecordWithTokenPagination
has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private <T> RecordPagingIterable<T> getRecordWithTokenPagination(final String endPoint, final Multimap<String, String> parameters, final Class<T> recordClass)
{
return new RecordPagingIterable<>(new RecordPagingIterable.PagingFunction<RecordPagingIterable.TokenPage<T>>()
{
@Override
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method waitExportJobComplete
has 30 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private ObjectNode waitExportJobComplete(MarketoRESTEndpoint marketoRESTEndpoint, String exportId, int pollingInterval, int waitTimeout) throws InterruptedException
{
long waitTime = 0;
long waitTimeoutMs = waitTimeout * 1000L;
long now = System.currentTimeMillis();
Method getCustomObjectRecordWithPagination
has 6 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private <T> RecordPagingIterable<T> getCustomObjectRecordWithPagination(final String endPoint, final String customObjectFilterType, final String customObjectFields, final Integer fromValue, final Integer toValue, final Class<T> recordClass)
Method getCustomObject
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public Iterable<ObjectNode> getCustomObject(String customObjectAPIName, String customObjectFilterType, String customObjectFields, Integer fromValue, Integer toValue)
Method getTokenPage
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
@SuppressWarnings("unchecked")
private RecordPagingIterable.TokenPage<T> getTokenPage(RecordPagingIterable.TokenPage page)
{
ImmutableListMultimap.Builder params = new ImmutableListMultimap.Builder<>();
params.put("_method", "GET");
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
public RecordPagingIterable<ObjectNode> getLeadsByProgram(String programId, String fieldNames)
{
Multimap<String, String> multimap = ArrayListMultimap.create();
multimap.put("fields", fieldNames);
return getRecordWithTokenPagination(endPoint + MarketoRESTEndpoint.GET_LEADS_BY_PROGRAM.getEndpoint(new ImmutableMap.Builder().put("program_id", programId).build()), multimap, ObjectNode.class);
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 53.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
public RecordPagingIterable<ObjectNode> getLeadsByList(String listId, String fieldNames)
{
Multimap<String, String> multimap = ArrayListMultimap.create();
multimap.put("fields", fieldNames);
return getRecordWithTokenPagination(endPoint + MarketoRESTEndpoint.GET_LEADS_BY_LIST.getEndpoint(new ImmutableMap.Builder().put("list_id", listId).build()), multimap, ObjectNode.class);
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 53.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76