Sign upLogin

trema/trema-edge

View on GitHub
Star
ruby/trema/accessor.rb

Summary

Maintainability
C
1 day
Test Coverage

Method define_accessor_meth has a Cognitive Complexity of 24 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

      def define_accessor_meth meth
        self.class.class_eval do
          define_method :"#{ meth }" do | *args |
            attrs = args
            opts = extract_options!( args )
Severity: Minor
Found in ruby/trema/accessor.rb - About 3 hrs to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method initialize has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    def initialize options=nil
      setters = self.class.instance_methods.select{ | i | i.to_s =~ /[a-z].+=$/ }
      required_attributes = self.class.attributes.required_attributes
      if required_attributes.empty?
        required_attributes = self.class.superclass.attributes.required_attributes
Severity: Minor
Found in ruby/trema/accessor.rb - About 1 hr to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method define_accessor has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

      def define_accessor attr_name, opts
        self.class_eval do
          define_method attr_name do
            instance_variable_get "@#{ attr_name }"
          end
Severity: Minor
Found in ruby/trema/accessor.rb - About 1 hr to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method initialize has 27 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    def initialize options=nil
      setters = self.class.instance_methods.select{ | i | i.to_s =~ /[a-z].+=$/ }
      required_attributes = self.class.attributes.required_attributes
      if required_attributes.empty?
        required_attributes = self.class.superclass.attributes.required_attributes
Severity: Minor
Found in ruby/trema/accessor.rb - About 1 hr to fix

    Method inherited has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

          def inherited klass
        map_ofp_type klass
        primitive_sizes.each do | each |
          define_accessor_meth :"unsigned_int#{ each }"
          define_method :"check_unsigned_int#{ each }" do | number, name |
    Severity: Minor
    Found in ruby/trema/accessor.rb - About 35 mins to fix

    Cognitive Complexity

    Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

    A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

    • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
    • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
    • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

    Further reading

    Method set_default has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

        def set_default setters
      default_attributes = self.class.attributes.default_attributes
      setters.each do | each |
        opt_key = each.to_s.sub( '=', '' ).to_sym
        if default_attributes.has_key? opt_key
    Severity: Minor
    Found in ruby/trema/accessor.rb - About 25 mins to fix

    Cognitive Complexity

    Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

    A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

    • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
    • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
    • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

    Further reading

    There are no issues that match your filters.

    Category
    Status