Sign upLogin

treyhunner/django-simple-history

View on GitHub
Star
simple_history/models.py

Summary

Maintainability
F
3 days
Test Coverage

File models.py has 936 lines of code (exceeds 500 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

import copy
import importlib
import uuid
import warnings
from dataclasses import dataclass
Severity: Major
Found in simple_history/models.py - About 1 day to fix

    HistoricalRecords has 27 functions (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

    class HistoricalRecords:
    DEFAULT_MODEL_NAME_PREFIX = "Historical"

    thread = context = LocalContext()  # retain thread for backwards compatibility
    m2m_models = {}
    Severity: Minor
    Found in simple_history/models.py - About 3 hrs to fix

      Function __init__ has 27 arguments (exceeds 7 allowed). Consider refactoring.
      Open

          def __init__(
      Severity: Major
      Found in simple_history/models.py - About 3 hrs to fix

        Cyclomatic complexity is too high in method copy_fields. (9)
        Open

            def copy_fields(self, model):
        """
        Creates copies of the model's original fields, returning
        a dictionary mapping field name to copied field object.
        """
        Severity: Minor
        Found in simple_history/models.py by radon

        Cyclomatic Complexity

        Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

        Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

        Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
        if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
        elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
        else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
        for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
        while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
        except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
        finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
        with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
        assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
        Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
        Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

        Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

        Cyclomatic complexity is too high in method _get_m2m_field_changes_for_diff. (9)
        Open

            def _get_m2m_field_changes_for_diff(
        self,
        old_history: "HistoricalChanges",
        m2m_fields: Iterable[str],
        foreign_keys_are_objs: bool,
        Severity: Minor
        Found in simple_history/models.py by radon

        Cyclomatic Complexity

        Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

        Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

        Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
        if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
        elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
        else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
        for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
        while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
        except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
        finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
        with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
        assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
        Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
        Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

        Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

        Function copy_fields has a Cognitive Complexity of 19 (exceeds 7 allowed). Consider refactoring.
        Open

            def copy_fields(self, model):
        """
        Creates copies of the model's original fields, returning
        a dictionary mapping field name to copied field object.
        """
        Severity: Minor
        Found in simple_history/models.py - About 2 hrs to fix

        Cognitive Complexity

        Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

        A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

        • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
        • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
        • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

        Further reading

        Cyclomatic complexity is too high in method finalize. (8)
        Open

            def finalize(self, sender, **kwargs):
        inherited = False
        if self.cls is not sender:  # set in concrete
            inherited = self.inherit and issubclass(sender, self.cls)
            if not inherited:
        Severity: Minor
        Found in simple_history/models.py by radon

        Cyclomatic Complexity

        Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

        Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

        Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
        if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
        elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
        else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
        for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
        while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
        except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
        finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
        with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
        assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
        Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
        Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

        Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

        Cyclomatic complexity is too high in method diff_against. (8)
        Open

            def diff_against(
        self,
        old_history: "HistoricalChanges",
        excluded_fields: Iterable[str] = None,
        included_fields: Iterable[str] = None,
        Severity: Minor
        Found in simple_history/models.py by radon

        Cyclomatic Complexity

        Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

        Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

        Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
        if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
        elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
        else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
        for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
        while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
        except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
        finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
        with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
        assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
        Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
        Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

        Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

        Cyclomatic complexity is too high in method __init__. (8)
        Open

            def __init__(
        self,
        verbose_name=None,
        verbose_name_plural=None,
        bases=(models.Model,),
        Severity: Minor
        Found in simple_history/models.py by radon

        Cyclomatic Complexity

        Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

        Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

        Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
        if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
        elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
        else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
        for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
        while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
        except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
        finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
        with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
        assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
        Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
        Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

        Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

        Cyclomatic complexity is too high in function transform_field. (8)
        Open

        def transform_field(field):
    """Customize field appropriately for use in historical model"""
    field.name = field.attname
    if isinstance(field, models.BigAutoField):
        field.__class__ = models.BigIntegerField
        Severity: Minor
        Found in simple_history/models.py by radon

        Cyclomatic Complexity

        Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

        Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

        Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
        if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
        elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
        else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
        for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
        while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
        except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
        finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
        with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
        assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
        Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
        Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

        Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

        Function _get_m2m_field_changes_for_diff has a Cognitive Complexity of 18 (exceeds 7 allowed). Consider refactoring.
        Open

            def _get_m2m_field_changes_for_diff(
        self,
        old_history: "HistoricalChanges",
        m2m_fields: Iterable[str],
        foreign_keys_are_objs: bool,
        Severity: Minor
        Found in simple_history/models.py - About 2 hrs to fix

        Cognitive Complexity

        Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

        A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

        • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
        • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
        • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

        Further reading

        Cyclomatic complexity is too high in method create_historical_record_m2ms. (7)
        Open

            def create_historical_record_m2ms(self, history_instance, instance):
        for field in history_instance._history_m2m_fields:
            m2m_history_model = self.m2m_models[field]
            original_instance = history_instance.instance
            through_model = getattr(original_instance, field.name).through
        Severity: Minor
        Found in simple_history/models.py by radon

        Cyclomatic Complexity

        Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

        Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

        Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
        if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
        elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
        else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
        for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
        while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
        except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
        finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
        with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
        assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
        Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
        Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

        Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

        Cyclomatic complexity is too high in class HistoricalChanges. (7)
        Open

        class HistoricalChanges(ModelTypeHint):
    def diff_against(
        self,
        old_history: "HistoricalChanges",
        excluded_fields: Iterable[str] = None,
        Severity: Minor
        Found in simple_history/models.py by radon

        Cyclomatic Complexity

        Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

        Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

        Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
        if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
        elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
        else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
        for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
        while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
        except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
        finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
        with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
        assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
        Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
        Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

        Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

        Function _get_field_changes_for_diff has a Cognitive Complexity of 17 (exceeds 7 allowed). Consider refactoring.
        Open

            def _get_field_changes_for_diff(
        self,
        old_history: "HistoricalChanges",
        fields: Iterable[str],
        foreign_keys_are_objs: bool,
        Severity: Minor
        Found in simple_history/models.py - About 1 hr to fix

        Cognitive Complexity

        Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

        A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

        • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
        • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
        • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

        Further reading

        Cyclomatic complexity is too high in method post_save. (6)
        Open

            def post_save(self, instance, created, using=None, **kwargs):
        if not getattr(settings, "SIMPLE_HISTORY_ENABLED", True):
            return
        if hasattr(instance, "skip_history_when_saving"):
            return
        Severity: Minor
        Found in simple_history/models.py by radon

        Cyclomatic Complexity

        Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

        Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

        Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
        if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
        elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
        else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
        for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
        while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
        except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
        finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
        with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
        assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
        Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
        Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

        Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

        Cyclomatic complexity is too high in method create_history_model. (6)
        Open

            def create_history_model(self, model, inherited):
        """
        Creates a historical model to associate with the model provided.
        """
        attrs = {
        Severity: Minor
        Found in simple_history/models.py by radon

        Cyclomatic Complexity

        Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

        Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

        Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
        if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
        elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
        else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
        for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
        while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
        except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
        finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
        with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
        assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
        Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
        Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

        Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

        Function __init__ has 30 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
        Open

            def __init__(
        self,
        verbose_name=None,
        verbose_name_plural=None,
        bases=(models.Model,),
        Severity: Minor
        Found in simple_history/models.py - About 1 hr to fix

          Function transform_field has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 7 allowed). Consider refactoring.
          Open

          def transform_field(field):
    """Customize field appropriately for use in historical model"""
    field.name = field.attname
    if isinstance(field, models.BigAutoField):
        field.__class__ = models.BigIntegerField
          Severity: Minor
          Found in simple_history/models.py - About 35 mins to fix

          Cognitive Complexity

          Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

          A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

          • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
          • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
          • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

          Further reading

          Function finalize has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 7 allowed). Consider refactoring.
          Open

              def finalize(self, sender, **kwargs):
        inherited = False
        if self.cls is not sender:  # set in concrete
            inherited = self.inherit and issubclass(sender, self.cls)
            if not inherited:
          Severity: Minor
          Found in simple_history/models.py - About 35 mins to fix

          Cognitive Complexity

          Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

          A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

          • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
          • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
          • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

          Further reading

          There are no issues that match your filters.

          Category
          Status