File optparse.rb
has 869 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
class OptionParser
# :stopdoc:
RCSID = %w$Id: optparse.rb 11798 2007-02-20 06:53:16Z knu $[1..-1].each {|s| s.freeze}.freeze
Version = (RCSID[1].split('.').collect {|s| s.to_i}.extend(Comparable).freeze if RCSID[1])
LastModified = (Time.gm(*RCSID[2, 2].join('-').scan(/\d+/).collect {|s| s.to_i}) if RCSID[2])
Method make_switch
has a Cognitive Complexity of 94 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def make_switch(opts, block = nil)
short, long, nolong, style, pattern, conv, not_pattern, not_conv, not_style = [], [], []
ldesc, sdesc, desc, arg = [], [], []
default_style = Switch::NoArgument
default_pattern = nil
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method parse_in_order
has a Cognitive Complexity of 88 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def parse_in_order(argv = default_argv, setter = nil, &nonopt) # :nodoc:
opt, arg, sw, val, rest = nil
nonopt ||= proc {|arg| throw :terminate, arg}
argv.unshift(arg) if arg = catch(:terminate) {
while arg = argv.shift
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Class OptionParser
has 59 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
class OptionParser
# :stopdoc:
RCSID = %w$Id: optparse.rb 11798 2007-02-20 06:53:16Z knu $[1..-1].each {|s| s.freeze}.freeze
Version = (RCSID[1].split('.').collect {|s| s.to_i}.extend(Comparable).freeze if RCSID[1])
LastModified = (Time.gm(*RCSID[2, 2].join('-').scan(/\d+/).collect {|s| s.to_i}) if RCSID[2])
Method complete
has a Cognitive Complexity of 31 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def complete(key, icase = false, pat = nil)
pat ||= Regexp.new('\A' + Regexp.quote(key).gsub(/\w+\b/, '\&\w*'),
icase)
canon, sw, k, v, cn = nil
candidates = []
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method make_switch
has 109 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def make_switch(opts, block = nil)
short, long, nolong, style, pattern, conv, not_pattern, not_conv, not_style = [], [], []
ldesc, sdesc, desc, arg = [], [], []
default_style = Switch::NoArgument
default_pattern = nil
Method summarize
has a Cognitive Complexity of 21 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def summarize(sdone = [], ldone = [], width = 1, max = width - 1, indent = "")
sopts, lopts, s = [], [], nil
@short.each {|s| sdone.fetch(s) {sopts << s}; sdone[s] = true} if @short
@long.each {|s| ldone.fetch(s) {lopts << s}; ldone[s] = true} if @long
return if sopts.empty? and lopts.empty? # completely hidden
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method parse_in_order
has 58 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def parse_in_order(argv = default_argv, setter = nil, &nonopt) # :nodoc:
opt, arg, sw, val, rest = nil
nonopt ||= proc {|arg| throw :terminate, arg}
argv.unshift(arg) if arg = catch(:terminate) {
while arg = argv.shift
Method getopts
has a Cognitive Complexity of 14 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def getopts(*args)
argv = Array === args.first ? args.shift : default_argv
single_options, *long_options = *args
result = {}
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method complete
has 37 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def complete(key, icase = false, pat = nil)
pat ||= Regexp.new('\A' + Regexp.quote(key).gsub(/\w+\b/, '\&\w*'),
icase)
canon, sw, k, v, cn = nil
candidates = []
Method parse_arg
has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def parse_arg(arg)
pattern or return nil, arg
unless m = pattern.match(arg)
yield(InvalidArgument, arg)
return arg, nil
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method initialize
has 7 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def initialize(pattern = nil, conv = nil,
short = nil, long = nil, arg = nil,
desc = ([] if short or long), block = Proc.new)
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
rescue InvalidOption
# if no short options match, try completion with long
# options.
sw, = complete(:long, opt)
eq ||= !rest
Method summarize
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def summarize(sdone = [], ldone = [], width = 1, max = width - 1, indent = "")
Method update
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def update(sw, sopts, lopts, nsw = nil, nlopts = nil)
Method complete
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def complete(id, opt, icase = false, *pat, &block)
Method summarize
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def summarize(to = [], width = @summary_width, max = width - 1, indent = @summary_indent, &blk)
Avoid too many return
statements within this method. Open
return arg[s.length..-1], m
Method add_banner
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def add_banner(to) # :nodoc:
unless @short or @long
s = desc.join
to << " [" + s + "]..." unless s.empty?
end
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method parse
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def parse(arg, argv, &error)
if !(val = arg) and (argv.empty? or /\A-/ =~ (val = argv[0]))
return nil, block, nil
end
opt = (val = parse_arg(val, &error))[1]
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"