trufflesuite/truffle

View on GitHub
packages/box/box.ts

Summary

Maintainability
C
1 day
Test Coverage

Function normalizeSourcePath has 75 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

export const normalizeSourcePath = (url = defaultPath) => {
  // Process filepath resolution
  //
  if (url.startsWith(".") || url.startsWith("/") || url.startsWith("~")) {
    debug({ in: url, out: path.normalize(url) });
Severity: Major
Found in packages/box/box.ts - About 3 hrs to fix

    Function normalizeSourcePath has a Cognitive Complexity of 17 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

    export const normalizeSourcePath = (url = defaultPath) => {
      // Process filepath resolution
      //
      if (url.startsWith(".") || url.startsWith("/") || url.startsWith("~")) {
        debug({ in: url, out: path.normalize(url) });
    Severity: Minor
    Found in packages/box/box.ts - About 2 hrs to fix

    Cognitive Complexity

    Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

    A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

    • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
    • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
    • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

    Further reading

    Function unbox has 30 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

      unbox: async (
        url: string,
        destination: string,
        options: unboxOptions = {},
        config: any
    Severity: Minor
    Found in packages/box/box.ts - About 1 hr to fix

      Consider simplifying this complex logical expression.
      Open

        } else if (typeof options === "object") {
          return {
            name: options.name || "default",
            unsafeCleanup: options.unsafeCleanup || false,
            setGracefulCleanup: options.setGracefulCleanup || false,
      Severity: Major
      Found in packages/box/box.ts - About 40 mins to fix

        Function checkDir has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
        Open

          checkDir: async (options: unboxOptions = {}, destination: string) => {
            let logger = options.logger || console;
            if (!options.force) {
              const unboxDir = fse.readdirSync(destination);
              if (unboxDir.length) {
        Severity: Minor
        Found in packages/box/box.ts - About 25 mins to fix

        Cognitive Complexity

        Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

        A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

        • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
        • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
        • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

        Further reading

        Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
        Open

              if (invalidBranch.test(branch)) {
                debug({
                  in: url,
                  error: "InvalidFormat (protocol)",
                  hint: "branch is malformed"
        Severity: Minor
        Found in packages/box/box.ts and 1 other location - About 30 mins to fix
        packages/box/box.ts on lines 134..141

        Duplicated Code

        Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

        Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

        When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

        Tuning

        This issue has a mass of 45.

        We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

        The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

        If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

        See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

        Refactorings

        Further Reading

        Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
        Open

            if (invalidBranch.test(branch)) {
              debug({
                in: url,
                error: "InvalidFormat (orgRepoBranch)",
                hint: "branch is malformed"
        Severity: Minor
        Found in packages/box/box.ts and 1 other location - About 30 mins to fix
        packages/box/box.ts on lines 82..89

        Duplicated Code

        Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

        Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

        When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

        Tuning

        This issue has a mass of 45.

        We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

        The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

        If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

        See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

        Refactorings

        Further Reading

        There are no issues that match your filters.

        Category
        Status