Showing 11 of 11 total issues
Class DocBuilder
has 23 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
class DocBuilder
attr_accessor :source, :destination, :documentation_assets, :dependencies, :index, :base_path, :renderer, :doc_blocks, :pages, :config_yml
attr_reader :errors
attr :doc_assets_dir, :output_dir, :input_dir, :header_erb, :footer_erb
Method write_docs
has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def write_docs
load_code_example_templates_and_renderers
renderer_instance = renderer.new(link_helper: link_helper)
markdown = Redcarpet::Markdown.new(renderer_instance, { fenced_code_blocks: true, tables: true })
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method copy_assets
has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def copy_assets
return unless doc_assets_dir
Dir.foreach(doc_assets_dir) do |item|
# ignore . and .. directories and files that start with
# underscore
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method create_nested_structure
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def create_nested_structure
blocks_to_remove_from_top_level = []
@doc_blocks.each do |key, doc_block|
# don't do anything to top level doc_blocks
next if !doc_block.parent
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method process_file
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def process_file(file, doc_block_collection)
file_str = File.read(file)
# get any comment blocks that match the patterns:
# .sass: //doc (follow by other lines proceeded by a space)
# other types: /*doc ... */
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if File.exists?("#{doc_assets_dir}/_header.html")
@header_erb = ERB.new(File.read("#{doc_assets_dir}/_header.html"))
elsif File.exists?("#{doc_assets_dir}/header.html")
@header_erb = ERB.new(File.read("#{doc_assets_dir}/header.html"))
else
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 38.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if File.exists?("#{doc_assets_dir}/_footer.html")
@footer_erb = ERB.new(File.read("#{doc_assets_dir}/_footer.html"))
elsif File.exists?("#{doc_assets_dir}/footer.html")
@footer_erb = ERB.new(File.read("#{doc_assets_dir}/footer.html"))
else
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 38.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Method run
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def run
return setup if args[0] == 'init'
extra_args = []
#support passing the config file with no command line flag
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method process_files
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def process_files(files, directory, doc_block_collection)
if !@ignore_paths.empty?
valid_files = files.select { |input_file|
@ignore_paths.select { |glob| File.fnmatch(glob, input_file) }.empty?
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method set_header_footer
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def set_header_footer
# load the markdown renderer we are going to use
if File.exists?("#{doc_assets_dir}/_header.html")
@header_erb = ERB.new(File.read("#{doc_assets_dir}/_header.html"))
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method parse_block
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def parse_block(comment_block, file)
plugin_sections = comment_block.markdown.scan(/^\s*\[\[\[plugin:#{Regexp.quote(@name)}(.*?)\]\]\]/m)
if self.is_active?
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"