Method fractional_rule_for
has a Cognitive Complexity of 20 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def fractional_rule_for(number)
# the obvious way to do this (multiply the value being formatted
# by each rule's base value until you get an integral result)
# doesn't work because of rounding error. This method is more
# accurate
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method rule_index_for
has a Cognitive Complexity of 17 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def rule_index_for(base_value)
if rule_index = special_rule_index_for(base_value)
return rule_index
end
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method lcm
has a Cognitive Complexity of 15 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def lcm(x, y)
# binary gcd algorithm from Knuth, "The Art of Computer Programming,"
# vol. 2, 1st ed., pp. 298-299
x1 = x
y1 = y
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method normal_rule_for
has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def normal_rule_for(number)
if rule = master_rule
rule
elsif number < 0 && rule = negative_rule
rule
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method fractional_rule_for
has 26 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def fractional_rule_for(number)
# the obvious way to do this (multiply the value being formatted
# by each rule's base value until you get an integral result)
# doesn't work because of rounding error. This method is more
# accurate