tylerhunt/remit

View on GitHub

Showing 12 of 12 total issues

Method validate_signature_v2 has a Cognitive Complexity of 17 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  def validate_signature_v2(args)
      [:parameters,
     :http_method,
     :url_end_point].each do |arg|
      raise "#{arg.inspect} is missing from the arguments." unless args[arg]
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/amazon/fps/signatureutilsforoutbound.rb - About 2 hrs to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method validate_signature_v2 has 37 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  def validate_signature_v2(args)
      [:parameters,
     :http_method,
     :url_end_point].each do |arg|
      raise "#{arg.inspect} is missing from the arguments." unless args[arg]
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/amazon/fps/signatureutilsforoutbound.rb - About 1 hr to fix

    Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
    Open

    module Remit
      module GetDebtBalance
        class Request < Remit::Request
          action :GetDebtBalance
          parameter :credit_instrument_id, :required => true
    Severity: Major
    Found in lib/remit/operations/get_debt_balance.rb and 1 other location - About 1 hr to fix
    lib/remit/operations/get_prepaid_balance.rb on lines 3..24

    Duplicated Code

    Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

    Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

    When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

    Tuning

    This issue has a mass of 54.

    We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

    The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

    If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

    See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

    Refactorings

    Further Reading

    Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
    Open

    module Remit
      module GetPrepaidBalance
        class Request < Remit::Request
          action :GetPrepaidBalance
          parameter :prepaid_instrument_id, :required => true
    Severity: Major
    Found in lib/remit/operations/get_prepaid_balance.rb and 1 other location - About 1 hr to fix
    lib/remit/operations/get_debt_balance.rb on lines 3..25

    Duplicated Code

    Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

    Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

    When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

    Tuning

    This issue has a mass of 54.

    We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

    The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

    If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

    See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

    Refactorings

    Further Reading

    Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
    Open

      def self.calculate_string_to_sign_v1(args)
        parameters = args[:parameters]
    
        # exclude any existing Signature parameter from the canonical string
        sorted = (parameters.reject { |k, v| ((k == SIGNATURE_KEYNAME)) }).sort { |a,b| a[0].downcase <=> b[0].downcase }
    Severity: Major
    Found in lib/amazon/fps/signatureutilsforoutbound.rb and 1 other location - About 1 hr to fix
    lib/amazon/fps/signatureutils.rb on lines 78..90

    Duplicated Code

    Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

    Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

    When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

    Tuning

    This issue has a mass of 51.

    We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

    The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

    If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

    See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

    Refactorings

    Further Reading

    Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
    Open

      def self.calculate_string_to_sign_v1(args)
        parameters = args[:parameters]
    
        # exclude any existing Signature parameter from the canonical string
        sorted = (parameters.reject { |k, v| k == SIGNATURE_KEYNAME }).sort { |a,b| a[0].downcase <=> b[0].downcase }
    Severity: Major
    Found in lib/amazon/fps/signatureutils.rb and 1 other location - About 1 hr to fix
    lib/amazon/fps/signatureutilsforoutbound.rb on lines 123..135

    Duplicated Code

    Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

    Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

    When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

    Tuning

    This issue has a mass of 51.

    We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

    The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

    If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

    See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

    Refactorings

    Further Reading

    Method initialize has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

        def initialize(request_url, params, client, options = {})
          if params.is_a?(String)
            @string_params = params
            @hash_params = Hash.from_url_params(params)
          else
    Severity: Minor
    Found in lib/remit/inbound_request.rb - About 1 hr to fix

    Cognitive Complexity

    Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

    A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

    • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
    • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
    • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

    Further reading

    Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
    Open

    module Remit
      module GetTotalPrepaidLiability
        class Request < Remit::Request
          action :GetTotalPrepaidLiability
        end
    Severity: Major
    Found in lib/remit/operations/get_total_prepaid_liability.rb and 1 other location - About 1 hr to fix
    lib/remit/operations/get_outstanding_debt_balance.rb on lines 3..22

    Duplicated Code

    Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

    Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

    When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

    Tuning

    This issue has a mass of 49.

    We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

    The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

    If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

    See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

    Refactorings

    Further Reading

    Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
    Open

    module Remit
      module GetOutstandingDebtBalance
        class Request < Remit::Request
          action :GetOutStandingDebtBalance
        end
    Severity: Major
    Found in lib/remit/operations/get_outstanding_debt_balance.rb and 1 other location - About 1 hr to fix
    lib/remit/operations/get_total_prepaid_liability.rb on lines 3..23

    Duplicated Code

    Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

    Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

    When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

    Tuning

    This issue has a mass of 49.

    We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

    The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

    If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

    See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

    Refactorings

    Further Reading

    Method calculate_string_to_sign_v2 has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

      def self.calculate_string_to_sign_v2(args)
        parameters = args[:parameters]
    
        uri = args[:uri]
        uri = "/" if uri.nil? or uri.empty?
    Severity: Minor
    Found in lib/amazon/fps/signatureutils.rb - About 45 mins to fix

    Cognitive Complexity

    Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

    A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

    • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
    • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
    • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

    Further reading

    Method valid? has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

        def valid?
          if @hash_params['signatureVersion'].to_i == 2
            #puts "\nhash_params: #{@hash_params.inspect}\n"
            #puts "\nstring_params: #{@string_params.inspect}\n"
            return false unless InboundRequest.check_parameters(@hash_params)
    Severity: Minor
    Found in lib/remit/inbound_request.rb - About 35 mins to fix

    Cognitive Complexity

    Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

    A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

    • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
    • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
    • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

    Further reading

    Method check_parameters has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

        def check_parameters(params)
    #      begin
            raise ":parameters must be enumerable" unless params.kind_of? Enumerable
    
            signature = params[SIGNATURE_KEYNAME];
    Severity: Minor
    Found in lib/remit/signature_utils_for_outbound.rb - About 35 mins to fix

    Cognitive Complexity

    Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

    A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

    • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
    • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
    • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

    Further reading

    Severity
    Category
    Status
    Source
    Language