unepwcmc/SAPI

View on GitHub
app/models/nomenclature_change/output.rb

Summary

Maintainability
C
1 day
Test Coverage

Class Output has 26 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

class NomenclatureChange::Output < ApplicationRecord
  include TrackWhoDoesIt
  attr_accessor :output_type # New taxon, Existing subspecies, Existing taxon
  # Migrated to controller (Strong Parameters)
  # attr_accessible :nomenclature_change_id, :taxon_concept_id,
Severity: Minor
Found in app/models/nomenclature_change/output.rb - About 3 hrs to fix

    Method tmp_taxon_concept has a Cognitive Complexity of 14 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

      def tmp_taxon_concept
        name_status_to_save = (new_name_status.present? ? new_name_status : name_status)
    
        scientific_name =
          if ['A', 'N'].include?(name_status_to_save) && display_full_name
    Severity: Minor
    Found in app/models/nomenclature_change/output.rb - About 1 hr to fix

    Cognitive Complexity

    Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

    A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

    • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
    • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
    • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

    Further reading

    Method tmp_taxon_concept has 33 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

      def tmp_taxon_concept
        name_status_to_save = (new_name_status.present? ? new_name_status : name_status)
    
        scientific_name =
          if ['A', 'N'].include?(name_status_to_save) && display_full_name
    Severity: Minor
    Found in app/models/nomenclature_change/output.rb - About 1 hr to fix

      Method populate_taxon_concept_fields has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
      Open

        def populate_taxon_concept_fields
          self.parent_id = taxon_concept.parent_id_changed? ? taxon_concept.parent_id_was : taxon_concept.parent_id
          self.rank_id = taxon_concept.rank_id_changed? ? taxon_concept.rank_id_was : taxon_concept.rank_id
          self.scientific_name = taxon_concept.full_name_changed? ? taxon_concept.full_name_was : taxon_concept.full_name
          self.author_year = taxon_concept.author_year_changed? ? taxon_concept.author_year_was : taxon_concept.author_year
      Severity: Minor
      Found in app/models/nomenclature_change/output.rb - About 1 hr to fix

      Cognitive Complexity

      Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

      A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

      • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
      • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
      • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

      Further reading

      Method validate_tmp_taxon_concept has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
      Open

        def validate_tmp_taxon_concept
          @tmp_taxon_concept = tmp_taxon_concept
          unless @tmp_taxon_concept
            errors.add(:new_taxon_concept, "can\'t be blank")
          end
      Severity: Minor
      Found in app/models/nomenclature_change/output.rb - About 25 mins to fix

      Cognitive Complexity

      Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

      A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

      • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
      • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
      • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

      Further reading

      Method new_full_name has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
      Open

        def new_full_name
          return nil if new_scientific_name.blank?
          rank = new_rank
          parent = new_parent || nomenclature_change.new_output_parent
          if parent && [Rank::SPECIES, Rank::SUBSPECIES].include?(rank.name)
      Severity: Minor
      Found in app/models/nomenclature_change/output.rb - About 25 mins to fix

      Cognitive Complexity

      Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

      A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

      • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
      • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
      • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

      Further reading

      There are no issues that match your filters.

      Category
      Status