Showing 4 of 4 total issues
Method create_insert_master_function
has 33 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Open
def create_insert_master_function
@sql.execute "CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION #{@table_name}_insert_master() RETURNS TRIGGER AS $$
DECLARE
colname text := '#{@column_name.to_sym}';
colval integer := NEW.#{@column_name.to_sym};
Method create_insert_master_function
has 33 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Open
def create_insert_master_function
@sql.execute "CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION #{@table_name}_insert_master() RETURNS TRIGGER AS $$
DECLARE
colname text := '#{@column_name.to_sym}';
colval timestamp := NEW.#{@column_name.to_sym};
Method create_insert_master_function
has 29 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Open
def create_insert_master_function
@sql.execute "CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION #{@table_name}_insert_master() RETURNS TRIGGER AS $$
DECLARE
colname text := '#{@column_name.to_sym}';
colval text := NEW.#{@column_name.to_sym};
Method valid?
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Open
def valid?
if super
@error_message = if !(@data_type.include?('timestamp') || @data_type.include?('date'))
I18n.t "pg_partitioning.failure.column_type"
elsif (@cond.blank? || !cond_valid?)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"