File SelfBlameableTrait.php
has 290 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
<?php
/**
* _ __ __ _____ _____ ___ ____ _____
* | | / // // ___//_ _// || __||_ _|
Function updateChildren
has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public function updateChildren($value = false)
{
$children = $this->getOldChildren();
if (empty($children)) {
return true;
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method updateChildren
has 31 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public function updateChildren($value = false)
{
$children = $this->getOldChildren();
if (empty($children)) {
return true;
Function deleteChildren
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public function deleteChildren()
{
$children = $this->children;
if (empty($children)) {
return true;
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function onUpdateChildren
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public function onUpdateChildren($event)
{
$sender = $event->sender;
if (!is_string($sender->parentAttribute)) {
return true;
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function onDeleteChildren
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public function onDeleteChildren($event)
{
$sender = $event->sender;
if (!is_string($sender->parentAttribute)) {
return true;
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
The method updateChildren has a boolean flag argument $value, which is a certain sign of a Single Responsibility Principle violation. Open
public function updateChildren($value = false)
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
BooleanArgumentFlag
Since: 1.4.0
A boolean flag argument is a reliable indicator for a violation of the Single Responsibility Principle (SRP). You can fix this problem by extracting the logic in the boolean flag into its own class or method.
Example
class Foo {
public function bar($flag = true) {
}
}
Source https://phpmd.org/rules/cleancode.html#booleanargumentflag
The method updateChildren uses an else expression. Else clauses are basically not necessary and you can simplify the code by not using them. Open
} else {
$child->$parentAttribute = $value;
}
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
ElseExpression
Since: 1.4.0
An if expression with an else branch is basically not necessary. You can rewrite the conditions in a way that the else clause is not necessary and the code becomes simpler to read. To achieve this, use early return statements, though you may need to split the code it several smaller methods. For very simple assignments you could also use the ternary operations.
Example
class Foo
{
public function bar($flag)
{
if ($flag) {
// one branch
} else {
// another branch
}
}
}
Source https://phpmd.org/rules/cleancode.html#elseexpression
Avoid using static access to class 'vistart\Models\traits\Yii' in method 'deleteChildren'. Open
Yii::warning($ex->errorInfo, static::className() . '\delete');
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
StaticAccess
Since: 1.4.0
Static access causes unexchangeable dependencies to other classes and leads to hard to test code. Avoid using static access at all costs and instead inject dependencies through the constructor. The only case when static access is acceptable is when used for factory methods.
Example
class Foo
{
public function bar()
{
Bar::baz();
}
}
Source https://phpmd.org/rules/cleancode.html#staticaccess
Avoid using static access to class 'vistart\Models\traits\Yii' in method 'deleteChildren'. Open
Yii::error($ex->errorInfo, static::className() . '\delete');
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
StaticAccess
Since: 1.4.0
Static access causes unexchangeable dependencies to other classes and leads to hard to test code. Avoid using static access at all costs and instead inject dependencies through the constructor. The only case when static access is acceptable is when used for factory methods.
Example
class Foo
{
public function bar()
{
Bar::baz();
}
}
Source https://phpmd.org/rules/cleancode.html#staticaccess
Avoid using static access to class 'vistart\Models\traits\Yii' in method 'updateChildren'. Open
Yii::error($ex->errorInfo, static::className() . '\update');
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
StaticAccess
Since: 1.4.0
Static access causes unexchangeable dependencies to other classes and leads to hard to test code. Avoid using static access at all costs and instead inject dependencies through the constructor. The only case when static access is acceptable is when used for factory methods.
Example
class Foo
{
public function bar()
{
Bar::baz();
}
}
Source https://phpmd.org/rules/cleancode.html#staticaccess
Avoid using static access to class 'vistart\Models\traits\Yii' in method 'updateChildren'. Open
Yii::warning($ex->errorInfo, static::className() . '\update');
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
StaticAccess
Since: 1.4.0
Static access causes unexchangeable dependencies to other classes and leads to hard to test code. Avoid using static access at all costs and instead inject dependencies through the constructor. The only case when static access is acceptable is when used for factory methods.
Example
class Foo
{
public function bar()
{
Bar::baz();
}
}
Source https://phpmd.org/rules/cleancode.html#staticaccess
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
try {
foreach ($children as $child) {
if ($value === false) {
$refIdAttribute = $this->refIdAttribute;
$child->$parentAttribute = $this->$refIdAttribute;
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 91.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
try {
foreach ($children as $child) {
if (!$child->delete()) {
throw new IntegrityException('Delete failed:' . $child->errors);
}
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 91.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Line exceeds 120 characters; contains 130 characters Open
if (empty($parent) || $this->guid == $parent->guid || $parent->hasAncestor($this) || $parent->hasReachedAncestorLimit()) {
- Exclude checks
Line exceeds 120 characters; contains 123 characters Open
return $this->hasMany(static::className(), [$this->parentAttribute => $this->refIdAttribute])->inverseOf('parent');
- Exclude checks
Whitespace found at end of line Open
*
- Exclude checks
Whitespace found at end of line Open
* If you want to get ancestor model, you can simplify instance a query and specify the
- Exclude checks