Method testElementOpt
has a Cognitive Complexity of 97 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public void testElementOpt() {
for (final View caseView : mCaseListIndexView) {
if (((WXTextView) caseView).getText().toString().equals("TC_Event")) {
Log.e(TAG, "TC_Event find");
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method testElementOpt
has 212 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public void testElementOpt() {
for (final View caseView : mCaseListIndexView) {
if (((WXTextView) caseView).getText().toString().equals("TC_Event")) {
Log.e(TAG, "TC_Event find");
File WeexUiTestCaseTcElementOpt.java
has 305 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
package com.alibaba.weex.uitest;
import android.app.Application;
import android.app.Instrumentation;
import android.content.Intent;
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if(childValue.equals("点击我,addEvent")){
Log.e(TAG, "点击我,addEvent find");
final View wenbenClickAndThenAddText1 = child;
mInstrumentation.runOnMainSync(new Runnable() {
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if(childValue.equals("点击我,removeEvent")){
Log.e(TAG, "点击我,removeEvent find");
final View wenbenClickAndThenAddText1 = child;
mInstrumentation.runOnMainSync(new Runnable() {
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if (childValue.equals("点击我,在我上方增加一个文本")) {
final WXTextView wenbenClickAndThenAddText = (WXTextView) child;
mInstrumentation.runOnMainSync(new Runnable() {
@Override
public void run() {
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if(childValue.equals("点击我,在我下方增加一个文本")){
Log.e(TAG, "childValue.equals(\"点击我,在我下方增加一个文本\")");
final WXTextView wenbenClickAndThenAddText1 = (WXTextView)child;
mInstrumentation.runOnMainSync(new Runnable() {
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if(childValue.equals("点击我,改变背景颜色")){
Log.e(TAG, "点击我,改变背景颜色 find");
final View wenbenClickAndThenAddText1 = child;
mInstrumentation.runOnMainSync(new Runnable() {
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if(childValue.equals("文本2,点击我自动消失")){
Log.e(TAG, "childValue.equals(\"文本2,点击我自动消失\")");
final WXTextView wenbenClickAndThenAddText1 = (WXTextView)child;
mInstrumentation.runOnMainSync(new Runnable() {
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if (childValue1.equals("文本1,点击我增加控件")) {
Log.e(TAG, "childValue.equals(\"文本1,点击我增加控件\")");
final WXTextView wenbenClickAndThenAddText1 = (WXTextView) child1;
mInstrumentation.runOnMainSync(new Runnable() {
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if(childValue.equals("点击测试Move方法")){
Log.e(TAG, "点击测试Move方法 find");
final View wenbenClickAndThenAddText1 = child;
mInstrumentation.runOnMainSync(new Runnable() {
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if(childValue.equals("文本2,点击我自动消失")){
Log.e(TAG, "childValue.equals(\"文本2,点击我自动消失\")");
final WXTextView wenbenClickAndThenAddText1 = (WXTextView)child;
mInstrumentation.runOnMainSync(new Runnable() {
Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if(childValue.equals("点击测试Move方法")){
Log.e(TAG, "点击测试Move方法 find");
final View wenbenClickAndThenAddText1 = child;
mInstrumentation.runOnMainSync(new Runnable() {
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 75.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if(childValue.equals("点击我,改变背景颜色")){
Log.e(TAG, "点击我,改变背景颜色 find");
final View wenbenClickAndThenAddText1 = child;
mInstrumentation.runOnMainSync(new Runnable() {
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 75.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if(childValue.equals("点击我,addEvent")){
Log.e(TAG, "点击我,addEvent find");
final View wenbenClickAndThenAddText1 = child;
mInstrumentation.runOnMainSync(new Runnable() {
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 75.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if (childValue.equals("点击我,在我上方增加一个文本")) {
final WXTextView wenbenClickAndThenAddText = (WXTextView) child;
mInstrumentation.runOnMainSync(new Runnable() {
@Override
public void run() {
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 59.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
public void screenShot(String shotName) {
sleep(2000);
try {
ScreenShot.shoot(WXPageActivity.wxPageActivityInstance, shotName);
} catch (IOException e) {
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 42.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76