weexteam/weex_devtools_android

View on GitHub
playground/app/src/androidTest/java/com/alibaba/weex/uitest/WeexUiTestCaseTcElementOpt.java

Summary

Maintainability
F
4 days
Test Coverage

Method testElementOpt has a Cognitive Complexity of 97 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    public void testElementOpt() {

        for (final View caseView : mCaseListIndexView) {
            if (((WXTextView) caseView).getText().toString().equals("TC_Event")) {
                Log.e(TAG, "TC_Event find");

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method testElementOpt has 212 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    public void testElementOpt() {

        for (final View caseView : mCaseListIndexView) {
            if (((WXTextView) caseView).getText().toString().equals("TC_Event")) {
                Log.e(TAG, "TC_Event find");

    File WeexUiTestCaseTcElementOpt.java has 305 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

    package com.alibaba.weex.uitest;
    
    import android.app.Application;
    import android.app.Instrumentation;
    import android.content.Intent;

      Avoid deeply nested control flow statements.
      Open

                              if(childValue.equals("点击我,addEvent")){
      
                                  Log.e(TAG, "点击我,addEvent find");
                                  final View wenbenClickAndThenAddText1 = child;
                                  mInstrumentation.runOnMainSync(new Runnable() {

        Avoid deeply nested control flow statements.
        Open

                                if(childValue.equals("点击我,removeEvent")){
        
                                    Log.e(TAG, "点击我,removeEvent find");
                                    final View wenbenClickAndThenAddText1 = child;
                                    mInstrumentation.runOnMainSync(new Runnable() {

          Avoid deeply nested control flow statements.
          Open

                                  if (childValue.equals("点击我,在我上方增加一个文本")) {
                                      final WXTextView wenbenClickAndThenAddText = (WXTextView) child;
                                      mInstrumentation.runOnMainSync(new Runnable() {
                                          @Override
                                          public void run() {

            Avoid deeply nested control flow statements.
            Open

                                    if(childValue.equals("点击我,在我下方增加一个文本")){
                                        Log.e(TAG, "childValue.equals(\"点击我,在我下方增加一个文本\")");
            
                                        final WXTextView wenbenClickAndThenAddText1 = (WXTextView)child;
                                        mInstrumentation.runOnMainSync(new Runnable() {

              Avoid deeply nested control flow statements.
              Open

                                      if(childValue.equals("点击我,改变背景颜色")){
              
                                          Log.e(TAG, "点击我,改变背景颜色 find");
                                          final View wenbenClickAndThenAddText1 = child;
                                          mInstrumentation.runOnMainSync(new Runnable() {

                Avoid deeply nested control flow statements.
                Open

                                        if(childValue.equals("文本2,点击我自动消失")){
                                            Log.e(TAG, "childValue.equals(\"文本2,点击我自动消失\")");
                
                                            final WXTextView wenbenClickAndThenAddText1 = (WXTextView)child;
                                            mInstrumentation.runOnMainSync(new Runnable() {

                  Avoid deeply nested control flow statements.
                  Open

                                          if (childValue1.equals("文本1,点击我增加控件")) {
                                              Log.e(TAG, "childValue.equals(\"文本1,点击我增加控件\")");
                  
                                              final WXTextView wenbenClickAndThenAddText1 = (WXTextView) child1;
                                              mInstrumentation.runOnMainSync(new Runnable() {

                    Avoid deeply nested control flow statements.
                    Open

                                            if(childValue.equals("点击测试Move方法")){
                    
                                                Log.e(TAG, "点击测试Move方法 find");
                                                    final View wenbenClickAndThenAddText1 = child;
                                                    mInstrumentation.runOnMainSync(new Runnable() {

                      Avoid deeply nested control flow statements.
                      Open

                                              if(childValue.equals("文本2,点击我自动消失")){
                                                  Log.e(TAG, "childValue.equals(\"文本2,点击我自动消失\")");
                      
                                                  final WXTextView wenbenClickAndThenAddText1 = (WXTextView)child;
                                                  mInstrumentation.runOnMainSync(new Runnable() {

                        Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.
                        Open

                                                if(childValue.equals("点击测试Move方法")){
                        
                                                    Log.e(TAG, "点击测试Move方法 find");
                                                        final View wenbenClickAndThenAddText1 = child;
                                                        mInstrumentation.runOnMainSync(new Runnable() {
                        playground/app/src/androidTest/java/com/alibaba/weex/uitest/WeexUiTestCaseTcElementOpt.java on lines 292..312
                        playground/app/src/androidTest/java/com/alibaba/weex/uitest/WeexUiTestCaseTcElementOpt.java on lines 313..333

                        Duplicated Code

                        Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

                        Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

                        When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

                        Tuning

                        This issue has a mass of 75.

                        We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

                        The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

                        If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

                        See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

                        Refactorings

                        Further Reading

                        Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.
                        Open

                                                if(childValue.equals("点击我,改变背景颜色")){
                        
                                                    Log.e(TAG, "点击我,改变背景颜色 find");
                                                    final View wenbenClickAndThenAddText1 = child;
                                                    mInstrumentation.runOnMainSync(new Runnable() {
                        playground/app/src/androidTest/java/com/alibaba/weex/uitest/WeexUiTestCaseTcElementOpt.java on lines 272..291
                        playground/app/src/androidTest/java/com/alibaba/weex/uitest/WeexUiTestCaseTcElementOpt.java on lines 313..333

                        Duplicated Code

                        Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

                        Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

                        When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

                        Tuning

                        This issue has a mass of 75.

                        We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

                        The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

                        If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

                        See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

                        Refactorings

                        Further Reading

                        Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.
                        Open

                                                if(childValue.equals("点击我,addEvent")){
                        
                                                    Log.e(TAG, "点击我,addEvent find");
                                                    final View wenbenClickAndThenAddText1 = child;
                                                    mInstrumentation.runOnMainSync(new Runnable() {
                        playground/app/src/androidTest/java/com/alibaba/weex/uitest/WeexUiTestCaseTcElementOpt.java on lines 272..291
                        playground/app/src/androidTest/java/com/alibaba/weex/uitest/WeexUiTestCaseTcElementOpt.java on lines 292..312

                        Duplicated Code

                        Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

                        Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

                        When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

                        Tuning

                        This issue has a mass of 75.

                        We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

                        The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

                        If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

                        See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

                        Refactorings

                        Further Reading

                        Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
                        Open

                                                if (childValue.equals("点击我,在我上方增加一个文本")) {
                                                    final WXTextView wenbenClickAndThenAddText = (WXTextView) child;
                                                    mInstrumentation.runOnMainSync(new Runnable() {
                                                        @Override
                                                        public void run() {
                        playground/app/src/androidTest/java/com/alibaba/weex/uitest/TC_Input/WeexUiTestCaseTcInputEvent.java on lines 244..258

                        Duplicated Code

                        Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

                        Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

                        When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

                        Tuning

                        This issue has a mass of 59.

                        We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

                        The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

                        If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

                        See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

                        Refactorings

                        Further Reading

                        Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
                        Open

                            public void screenShot(String shotName) {
                                sleep(2000);
                                try {
                                    ScreenShot.shoot(WXPageActivity.wxPageActivityInstance, shotName);
                                } catch (IOException e) {
                        playground/app/src/androidTest/java/com/alibaba/weex/uitest/TC_Color/WeexUiTestCaseTcColorUpdate.java on lines 212..220

                        Duplicated Code

                        Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

                        Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

                        When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

                        Tuning

                        This issue has a mass of 42.

                        We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

                        The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

                        If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

                        See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

                        Refactorings

                        Further Reading

                        There are no issues that match your filters.

                        Category
                        Status